Diagnostic accuracy of doppler-derived renal ultrasound parameters for predicting acute kidney injury after cardiac surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Laura Esperanza Jiménez Gómez, Cándida Díaz-Brochero, Daniela Patiño Hernández, Sergio Velasco Malagón, Juan Daniel Caicedo-Ruiz, Daniel Martin, Luis Carlos Triana Moreno
{"title":"Diagnostic accuracy of doppler-derived renal ultrasound parameters for predicting acute kidney injury after cardiac surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Laura Esperanza Jiménez Gómez, Cándida Díaz-Brochero, Daniela Patiño Hernández, Sergio Velasco Malagón, Juan Daniel Caicedo-Ruiz, Daniel Martin, Luis Carlos Triana Moreno","doi":"10.1007/s10157-026-02931-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a frequent and clinically significant complication following cardiac surgery. Doppler-derived renal ultrasound parameters-including the renal resistive index (RRI), semiquantitative power Doppler ultrasound (PDU) scales, and intrarenal venous flow (IRVF)-have been proposed as early, noninvasive predictors of postoperative AKI, but their diagnostic accuracy in this setting remains uncertain.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a systematic review of diagnostic test accuracy studies evaluating RRI, PDU, or IRVF for predicting AKI within 7 days after cardiac surgery in adult intensive care unit patients. MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane CENTRAL, Scopus, Web of Science, and clinical trial registries were searched through June 2025. Sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) were extracted or calculated. Meta-analysis was performed for RRI using hierarchical bivariate models; IRVF and PDU were summarized descriptively due to limited studies and heterogeneity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fourteen studies comprising 1,204 patients were included (12 RRI, 3 IRVF, 1 PDU). RRI thresholds between 0.71 and 0.74 demonstrated the highest diagnostic performance (AUC range 0.72-0.93). IRVF showed modest discrimination (AUC 0.62-0.66). Evidence for PDU was limited to one study. Substantial clinical and methodological heterogeneity was observed and overall certainty of evidence ranged from low to moderate.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Among Doppler-derived renal ultrasound parameters, RRI appears to have the most consistent diagnostic accuracy for predicting AKI after cardiac surgery. However, methodological heterogeneity, the limited number of studies, and the low-to-moderate certainty of the evidence preclude definitive clinical recommendations. Prospective multicenter validation studies with standardized protocols and prespecified thresholds are warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":10349,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Experimental Nephrology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Experimental Nephrology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10157-026-02931-9","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a frequent and clinically significant complication following cardiac surgery. Doppler-derived renal ultrasound parameters-including the renal resistive index (RRI), semiquantitative power Doppler ultrasound (PDU) scales, and intrarenal venous flow (IRVF)-have been proposed as early, noninvasive predictors of postoperative AKI, but their diagnostic accuracy in this setting remains uncertain.
Methods: We conducted a systematic review of diagnostic test accuracy studies evaluating RRI, PDU, or IRVF for predicting AKI within 7 days after cardiac surgery in adult intensive care unit patients. MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane CENTRAL, Scopus, Web of Science, and clinical trial registries were searched through June 2025. Sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) were extracted or calculated. Meta-analysis was performed for RRI using hierarchical bivariate models; IRVF and PDU were summarized descriptively due to limited studies and heterogeneity.
Results: Fourteen studies comprising 1,204 patients were included (12 RRI, 3 IRVF, 1 PDU). RRI thresholds between 0.71 and 0.74 demonstrated the highest diagnostic performance (AUC range 0.72-0.93). IRVF showed modest discrimination (AUC 0.62-0.66). Evidence for PDU was limited to one study. Substantial clinical and methodological heterogeneity was observed and overall certainty of evidence ranged from low to moderate.
Conclusions: Among Doppler-derived renal ultrasound parameters, RRI appears to have the most consistent diagnostic accuracy for predicting AKI after cardiac surgery. However, methodological heterogeneity, the limited number of studies, and the low-to-moderate certainty of the evidence preclude definitive clinical recommendations. Prospective multicenter validation studies with standardized protocols and prespecified thresholds are warranted.
期刊介绍:
Clinical and Experimental Nephrology is a peer-reviewed monthly journal, officially published by the Japanese Society of Nephrology (JSN) to provide an international forum for the discussion of research and issues relating to the study of nephrology. Out of respect for the founders of the JSN, the title of this journal uses the term “nephrology,” a word created and brought into use with the establishment of the JSN (Japanese Journal of Nephrology, Vol. 2, No. 1, 1960). The journal publishes articles on all aspects of nephrology, including basic, experimental, and clinical research, so as to share the latest research findings and ideas not only with members of the JSN, but with all researchers who wish to contribute to a better understanding of recent advances in nephrology. The journal is unique in that it introduces to an international readership original reports from Japan and also the clinical standards discussed and agreed by JSN.