Leah K Flatman, Lisiane F Leal, Gabra Nohmie, Anick Bérard
{"title":"Prevalence of pregnancy and birth outcomes following biologic exposure in immune-mediated inflammatory diseases: A population-based study.","authors":"Leah K Flatman, Lisiane F Leal, Gabra Nohmie, Anick Bérard","doi":"10.1002/bcp.70848","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Almost 5% of pregnancies are affected by immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMIDs). As treatments become available, understanding their use during pregnancy is important. We aimed to describe maternal, pregnancy and infant outcomes among IMID pregnancies exposed to biologic therapies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using the Merative™ MarketScan® Commercial Database, we identified pregnancies among mothers aged 15-45 with a pre-gestational IMID diagnosis. Biologic exposure during pregnancy was ascertained using prescription and procedure claims and classified by trimester. Outcomes included maternal complications, fetal/neonatal outcomes and pregnancy loss. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize characteristics, comorbidities, medication use and outcomes by biologic exposure status.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 257 409 IMID pregnancies, 6531 (2.5%) were exposed to biologics. Biologic-exposed pregnancies more frequently involved multiple IMIDs (34.9% vs. 7.7%). Nearly half of tumour necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi) exposures occurred across all trimesters, while first-trimester-only exposure was more common for several non-TNFi biologics. Live births occurred in 77.4% of biologic-exposed pregnancies and 74.2% of biologic-unexposed pregnancies, with most births occurring at term. Maternal serious infections (i.e., infections requiring hospitalization) occurred in 19.7% of biologic-exposed pregnancies and 16.5% of unexposed pregnancies. Among 2066 biologic-exposed infants, the proportions of low birth weight and neonatal intensive care unit admission varied by specific non-TNFi biologics, whereas the distribution of neonatal outcomes appeared similar across exposure groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Biologic use in IMID pregnancy increased over time and extended beyond the first trimester. Pregnancies with biologic exposure differed from unexposed pregnancies in disease characteristics and treatment patterns. Maternal and neonatal outcomes varied across biologic exposure groups.</p>","PeriodicalId":9251,"journal":{"name":"British journal of clinical pharmacology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British journal of clinical pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/bcp.70848","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Aims: Almost 5% of pregnancies are affected by immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMIDs). As treatments become available, understanding their use during pregnancy is important. We aimed to describe maternal, pregnancy and infant outcomes among IMID pregnancies exposed to biologic therapies.
Methods: Using the Merative™ MarketScan® Commercial Database, we identified pregnancies among mothers aged 15-45 with a pre-gestational IMID diagnosis. Biologic exposure during pregnancy was ascertained using prescription and procedure claims and classified by trimester. Outcomes included maternal complications, fetal/neonatal outcomes and pregnancy loss. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize characteristics, comorbidities, medication use and outcomes by biologic exposure status.
Results: Among 257 409 IMID pregnancies, 6531 (2.5%) were exposed to biologics. Biologic-exposed pregnancies more frequently involved multiple IMIDs (34.9% vs. 7.7%). Nearly half of tumour necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi) exposures occurred across all trimesters, while first-trimester-only exposure was more common for several non-TNFi biologics. Live births occurred in 77.4% of biologic-exposed pregnancies and 74.2% of biologic-unexposed pregnancies, with most births occurring at term. Maternal serious infections (i.e., infections requiring hospitalization) occurred in 19.7% of biologic-exposed pregnancies and 16.5% of unexposed pregnancies. Among 2066 biologic-exposed infants, the proportions of low birth weight and neonatal intensive care unit admission varied by specific non-TNFi biologics, whereas the distribution of neonatal outcomes appeared similar across exposure groups.
Conclusion: Biologic use in IMID pregnancy increased over time and extended beyond the first trimester. Pregnancies with biologic exposure differed from unexposed pregnancies in disease characteristics and treatment patterns. Maternal and neonatal outcomes varied across biologic exposure groups.
目的:近5%的妊娠受到免疫介导的炎症性疾病(IMIDs)的影响。随着治疗方法的出现,了解它们在怀孕期间的使用是很重要的。我们的目的是描述暴露于生物治疗的IMID妊娠的孕产妇、妊娠和婴儿结局。方法:使用Merative™MarketScan®商业数据库,我们在15-45岁的孕前诊断为IMID的母亲中确定妊娠。在怀孕期间的生物暴露是确定使用处方和程序索赔和分类的三个月。结局包括产妇并发症、胎儿/新生儿结局和妊娠流产。采用描述性统计方法总结生物暴露状态的特征、合并症、用药情况和结局。结果:257 409例IMID妊娠中,6531例(2.5%)暴露于生物制剂。生物暴露妊娠更频繁地涉及多种IMIDs (34.9% vs. 7.7%)。近一半的肿瘤坏死因子抑制剂(TNFi)暴露发生在所有妊娠期,而仅在妊娠早期暴露在几种非TNFi生物制剂中更为常见。77.4%的生物暴露妊娠和74.2%的生物暴露妊娠发生活产,大多数分娩发生在足月。产妇严重感染(即需要住院治疗的感染)发生在接触生物的妊娠中占19.7%,未接触生物的妊娠中占16.5%。在2066名生物暴露的婴儿中,低出生体重和新生儿重症监护病房入院的比例因特定的非tnfi生物制剂而异,而新生儿结局的分布在暴露组之间似乎相似。结论:生物制剂在IMID妊娠中的应用随着时间的推移而增加,并延长至妊娠早期。生物暴露的妊娠与未暴露的妊娠在疾病特征和治疗模式上不同。不同生物暴露组的产妇和新生儿结局不同。
期刊介绍:
Published on behalf of the British Pharmacological Society, the British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology features papers and reports on all aspects of drug action in humans: review articles, mini review articles, original papers, commentaries, editorials and letters. The Journal enjoys a wide readership, bridging the gap between the medical profession, clinical research and the pharmaceutical industry. It also publishes research on new methods, new drugs and new approaches to treatment. The Journal is recognised as one of the leading publications in its field. It is online only, publishes open access research through its OnlineOpen programme and is published monthly.