Optimization of selected SPECT system parameters for proton range verification: a Monte Carlo study.

IF 2 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
S Gharib, P Taherparvar
{"title":"Optimization of selected SPECT system parameters for proton range verification: a Monte Carlo study.","authors":"S Gharib, P Taherparvar","doi":"10.1088/2057-1976/aeae43","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This Monte Carlo study investigated a dual-head SPECT-based system for prompt-gamma (PG) range verification in proton therapy, focusing on energy-window and collimator septal thickness effects on PG emission profiles and distal dose fall-off. Using GATE, correlations between PG emissions (4.44, 5.24, 6.13 MeV) and proton depth-dose distributions were evaluated for 90-180 MeV beams in a PMMA phantom. Narrow (4.2-4.6, 5.0-5.4, 5.9-6.3 MeV) and broad (4.2-6.3 MeV) windows were studied. A dual-head SPECT with parallel-hole collimator (1-5 mm septa) was simulated. Image reconstruction was performed with FBP and with OSEM including attenuation correction, using STIR 6.2. The 5.9-6.3 MeV window showed the highest spatial correlation with proton range (Δ ≈1 mm), but its low yield limited applicability. The 4.2-4.6 and 4.2-6.3 MeV windows balanced detection yield and accuracy (Δ ≈2-3 mm). Septal thicknesses ⩾4 mm produced shadowing artefacts, whereas 3 mm gave the most accurate PG localization for the 90 MeV proton beam studied. For the 4.2-4.6 and 4.2-6.3 MeV windows, the PG localization errors (relative to the true PG emission profile) were 1.5 ± 0.5 and 1.4 ± 0.4 mm with FBP, and 1.9 ± 0.3 and 1.7 ± 0.4 mm with OSEM, despite ∼20% lower PG yield than the 1 mm septum. Overall, appropriate window and septal thickness provided PG localization accuracy of 1-2 mm. A 3 mm septum with either the 4.2-4.6 or 4.2-6.3 MeV window offers a favourable trade-off between spatial accuracy and detection efficiency under the 90 MeV condition investigated here, highlighting the potential of optimized SPECT systems for proton range monitoring at this energy.</p>","PeriodicalId":8896,"journal":{"name":"Biomedical Physics & Engineering Express","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomedical Physics & Engineering Express","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/2057-1976/aeae43","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This Monte Carlo study investigated a dual-head SPECT-based system for prompt-gamma (PG) range verification in proton therapy, focusing on energy-window and collimator septal thickness effects on PG emission profiles and distal dose fall-off. Using GATE, correlations between PG emissions (4.44, 5.24, 6.13 MeV) and proton depth-dose distributions were evaluated for 90-180 MeV beams in a PMMA phantom. Narrow (4.2-4.6, 5.0-5.4, 5.9-6.3 MeV) and broad (4.2-6.3 MeV) windows were studied. A dual-head SPECT with parallel-hole collimator (1-5 mm septa) was simulated. Image reconstruction was performed with FBP and with OSEM including attenuation correction, using STIR 6.2. The 5.9-6.3 MeV window showed the highest spatial correlation with proton range (Δ ≈1 mm), but its low yield limited applicability. The 4.2-4.6 and 4.2-6.3 MeV windows balanced detection yield and accuracy (Δ ≈2-3 mm). Septal thicknesses ⩾4 mm produced shadowing artefacts, whereas 3 mm gave the most accurate PG localization for the 90 MeV proton beam studied. For the 4.2-4.6 and 4.2-6.3 MeV windows, the PG localization errors (relative to the true PG emission profile) were 1.5 ± 0.5 and 1.4 ± 0.4 mm with FBP, and 1.9 ± 0.3 and 1.7 ± 0.4 mm with OSEM, despite ∼20% lower PG yield than the 1 mm septum. Overall, appropriate window and septal thickness provided PG localization accuracy of 1-2 mm. A 3 mm septum with either the 4.2-4.6 or 4.2-6.3 MeV window offers a favourable trade-off between spatial accuracy and detection efficiency under the 90 MeV condition investigated here, highlighting the potential of optimized SPECT systems for proton range monitoring at this energy.

质子范围验证选择SPECT系统参数的优化:蒙特卡罗研究。
这项蒙特卡罗研究研究了一种基于双头SPECT的系统,用于质子治疗中的即时伽马(PG)范围验证,重点研究了能量窗和准直器间隔厚度对PG发射谱和远端剂量衰减的影响。利用GATE,对PMMA幻影中90-180 MeV光束的PG辐射(4.44,5.24,6.13 MeV)与质子深度剂量分布之间的相关性进行了评估。窄窗(4.2-4.6,5.0-5.4,5.9-6.3 MeV)和宽窗(4.2-6.3 MeV)研究。模拟了具有平行孔准直器(间隔1 ~ 5mm)的双头SPECT。图像重建使用FBP和OSEM (STIR 6.2)进行衰减校正。5.9-6.3 MeV窗口与质子范围的空间相关性最高(Δ≈1 mm),但其低产率限制了其适用性。4.2-4.6和4.2-6.3 MeV窗口平衡了检测良率和精度(Δ≈2-3 mm)。间隔厚度≥4mm会产生阴影,而对于所研究的90 MeV质子束,3mm给出了最准确的PG定位。对于4.2-4.6和4.2-6.3 MeV窗口,FBP的PG定位误差(相对于真实PG发射剖面)为1.5±0.5和1.4±0.4 mm, OSEM的PG定位误差为1.9±0.3和1.7±0.4 mm,尽管PG产率比1 mm间隔低约20%。总体而言,适当的窗口和间隔厚度可提供1-2 mm的PG定位精度。在这里研究的90 MeV条件下,具有4.2-4.6或4.2-6.3 MeV窗口的3mm间隔在空间精度和探测效率之间提供了有利的权衡,突出了优化的SPECT系统在该能量下进行质子范围监测的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Biomedical Physics & Engineering Express
Biomedical Physics & Engineering Express RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
153
期刊介绍: BPEX is an inclusive, international, multidisciplinary journal devoted to publishing new research on any application of physics and/or engineering in medicine and/or biology. Characterized by a broad geographical coverage and a fast-track peer-review process, relevant topics include all aspects of biophysics, medical physics and biomedical engineering. Papers that are almost entirely clinical or biological in their focus are not suitable. The journal has an emphasis on publishing interdisciplinary work and bringing research fields together, encompassing experimental, theoretical and computational work.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书