{"title":"Health-Related Quality of Life after Open and Endovascular Revascularization for Aortoiliac Occlusive Disease: A Prospective Cohort Study","authors":"Francesco Squizzato, Elda Chiara Colacchio, Sabrina Menara, Mirko Menegolo, Franco Grego, Michele Piazza, Michele Antonello","doi":"10.1016/j.avsg.2026.09.024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>To investigate the impact of open repair (OpR) and endovascular repair (ER) on health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in patients treated for aortoiliac occlusive disease (AIOD).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We conducted a single-center prospective observational cohort study on consecutive patients treated by OpR and ER for AIOD between January 2020 and July 2025. HRQOL was assessed using the 36-Item Short Form Health (SF-36) questionnaire at baseline, 1, 6, and 12 months. Physical component summary (PCS) and mental component summary (MCS) scores were compared between treatment groups using linear mixed-effects models with fixed effects for time, treatment, and their interaction. Linear regression models were used to assess factors associated with baseline HRQOL, while Firth's penalized logistic regression was used to evaluate factors associated with changes in HRQOL during follow up.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Eighty-one patients were included: 20 (24.7%) underwent OpR and 61 (75.3%) ER for claudication (74.1%), rest pain (13.6%), or tissue loss (12.3%). No postoperative mortality occurred. Baseline PCS was associated with higher Rutherford class (<em>P</em> = 0.033) and TransAtlantic Inter-Society Consensus (TASC) lesion complexity (<em>P</em> = 0.02), while baseline MCS was associated with disease severity (<em>P</em> = 0.018) and comorbidities (<em>P</em> = 0.048). PCS improved significantly over time (<em>P</em> < 0.001), with a faster early improvement in the ER group (<em>P</em> for interaction = 0.005), especially within the first month from the procedure (<em>P</em> = 0.011). MCS also improved over time (<em>P</em> = 0.005), with no differences between groups. Early reintervention (<em>P</em> = 0.049 for PCS), late complications (<em>P</em> = 0.018 for PCS; <em>P</em> = 0.031 for MCS), chronic kidney disease (CKD) (<em>P</em> = 0.012 for PCS), coronary artery disease (CAD) (<em>P</em> = 0.014), and limb loss (<em>P</em> = 0.049 for PCS) were associated with reduced likelihood scores of HRQOL improvements at follow up.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Both OpR and ER were associated with significant improvements in HRQOL. ER provided faster early physical recovery, whereas mental health outcomes were comparable between treatment strategies. Patient characteristics and postoperative adverse events had a greater influence on HRQOL recovery than the revascularization strategy itself.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8061,"journal":{"name":"Annals of vascular surgery","volume":"134 ","pages":"Pages 416-427"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2027-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of vascular surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0890509626006746","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/10/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
To investigate the impact of open repair (OpR) and endovascular repair (ER) on health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in patients treated for aortoiliac occlusive disease (AIOD).
Methods
We conducted a single-center prospective observational cohort study on consecutive patients treated by OpR and ER for AIOD between January 2020 and July 2025. HRQOL was assessed using the 36-Item Short Form Health (SF-36) questionnaire at baseline, 1, 6, and 12 months. Physical component summary (PCS) and mental component summary (MCS) scores were compared between treatment groups using linear mixed-effects models with fixed effects for time, treatment, and their interaction. Linear regression models were used to assess factors associated with baseline HRQOL, while Firth's penalized logistic regression was used to evaluate factors associated with changes in HRQOL during follow up.
Results
Eighty-one patients were included: 20 (24.7%) underwent OpR and 61 (75.3%) ER for claudication (74.1%), rest pain (13.6%), or tissue loss (12.3%). No postoperative mortality occurred. Baseline PCS was associated with higher Rutherford class (P = 0.033) and TransAtlantic Inter-Society Consensus (TASC) lesion complexity (P = 0.02), while baseline MCS was associated with disease severity (P = 0.018) and comorbidities (P = 0.048). PCS improved significantly over time (P < 0.001), with a faster early improvement in the ER group (P for interaction = 0.005), especially within the first month from the procedure (P = 0.011). MCS also improved over time (P = 0.005), with no differences between groups. Early reintervention (P = 0.049 for PCS), late complications (P = 0.018 for PCS; P = 0.031 for MCS), chronic kidney disease (CKD) (P = 0.012 for PCS), coronary artery disease (CAD) (P = 0.014), and limb loss (P = 0.049 for PCS) were associated with reduced likelihood scores of HRQOL improvements at follow up.
Conclusion
Both OpR and ER were associated with significant improvements in HRQOL. ER provided faster early physical recovery, whereas mental health outcomes were comparable between treatment strategies. Patient characteristics and postoperative adverse events had a greater influence on HRQOL recovery than the revascularization strategy itself.
期刊介绍:
Annals of Vascular Surgery, published eight times a year, invites original manuscripts reporting clinical and experimental work in vascular surgery for peer review. Articles may be submitted for the following sections of the journal:
Clinical Research (reports of clinical series, new drug or medical device trials)
Basic Science Research (new investigations, experimental work)
Case Reports (reports on a limited series of patients)
General Reviews (scholarly review of the existing literature on a relevant topic)
Developments in Endovascular and Endoscopic Surgery
Selected Techniques (technical maneuvers)
Historical Notes (interesting vignettes from the early days of vascular surgery)
Editorials/Correspondence