Mengsun Li, Maoxian Yang, Han Sheng, Qianqian Wang, Ya Shen, Liyan Yang, Xuwen Wu, Zewei Jiang
{"title":"An augmented rehabilitation package incorporating immersive virtual reality during early recovery after ARDS: A randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Mengsun Li, Maoxian Yang, Han Sheng, Qianqian Wang, Ya Shen, Liyan Yang, Xuwen Wu, Zewei Jiang","doi":"10.1016/j.aicoj.2026.100154","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Survivors of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) frequently experience cognitive impairment, psychological symptoms, and reduced health-related quality of life after intensive care. Immersive virtual reality (VR) may provide an engaging, multimodal adjunct to conventional rehabilitation, but evidence in the ARDS recovery population remains limited.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this single-center, parallel-group randomized controlled trial, 88 ARDS patients in the rehabilitation phase were randomized 1:1 to a 4-week augmented rehabilitation package incorporating immersive VR in addition to usual care (n = 44) or usual care alone (n = 44). One control participant was lost to follow-up, and 87 participants were included in the available-case analysis. The primary outcome was change in Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) score from baseline to 4 weeks. Secondary outcomes included the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) scores. The main between-group analysis used analysis of covariance (ANCOVA), with follow-up score as the dependent variable and baseline score as the covariate.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Baseline imbalances were observed for age, MoCA, SF-36, and HADS-A scores. After adjustment for corresponding baseline scores, the VR group showed greater improvement in MoCA score than the control group (adjusted between-group effect: 1.42, 95% CI 0.86-1.98; <i>p <</i> 0.001). The VR group also showed higher SF-36 scores (adjusted effect: 13.20, 95% CI 11.85-14.54; <i>p <</i> 0.001) and lower HADS-A scores (adjusted effect: -2.55, 95% CI -3.23 to -1.88; <i>p <</i> 0.001). In the VR group, 29 of 44 participants (65.9%) reported being very satisfied or satisfied with the intervention.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>An augmented rehabilitation package incorporating immersive VR was associated with short-term improvements in cognition, health-related quality of life, and anxiety symptoms during early ARDS recovery. Because the package also entailed additional structured rehabilitation exposure, staff attention, interaction, repeated activity, feedback, and treatment time, and because the control condition was not time- or attention-matched, the observed differences cannot be attributed specifically to VR. These single-center, short-term, hypothesis-generating findings require confirmation in larger studies with time- and attention-matched controls. Trial registration: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, ChiCTR2600122078; retrospectively registered on 8 April 2026, after completion of participant recruitment.</p>","PeriodicalId":7966,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Intensive Care","volume":"16 ","pages":"100154"},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13634264/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Intensive Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aicoj.2026.100154","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Survivors of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) frequently experience cognitive impairment, psychological symptoms, and reduced health-related quality of life after intensive care. Immersive virtual reality (VR) may provide an engaging, multimodal adjunct to conventional rehabilitation, but evidence in the ARDS recovery population remains limited.
Methods: In this single-center, parallel-group randomized controlled trial, 88 ARDS patients in the rehabilitation phase were randomized 1:1 to a 4-week augmented rehabilitation package incorporating immersive VR in addition to usual care (n = 44) or usual care alone (n = 44). One control participant was lost to follow-up, and 87 participants were included in the available-case analysis. The primary outcome was change in Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) score from baseline to 4 weeks. Secondary outcomes included the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) scores. The main between-group analysis used analysis of covariance (ANCOVA), with follow-up score as the dependent variable and baseline score as the covariate.
Results: Baseline imbalances were observed for age, MoCA, SF-36, and HADS-A scores. After adjustment for corresponding baseline scores, the VR group showed greater improvement in MoCA score than the control group (adjusted between-group effect: 1.42, 95% CI 0.86-1.98; p < 0.001). The VR group also showed higher SF-36 scores (adjusted effect: 13.20, 95% CI 11.85-14.54; p < 0.001) and lower HADS-A scores (adjusted effect: -2.55, 95% CI -3.23 to -1.88; p < 0.001). In the VR group, 29 of 44 participants (65.9%) reported being very satisfied or satisfied with the intervention.
Conclusions: An augmented rehabilitation package incorporating immersive VR was associated with short-term improvements in cognition, health-related quality of life, and anxiety symptoms during early ARDS recovery. Because the package also entailed additional structured rehabilitation exposure, staff attention, interaction, repeated activity, feedback, and treatment time, and because the control condition was not time- or attention-matched, the observed differences cannot be attributed specifically to VR. These single-center, short-term, hypothesis-generating findings require confirmation in larger studies with time- and attention-matched controls. Trial registration: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, ChiCTR2600122078; retrospectively registered on 8 April 2026, after completion of participant recruitment.
背景:急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)的幸存者经常经历认知障碍、心理症状和重症监护后健康相关生活质量下降。沉浸式虚拟现实(VR)可能为传统康复提供了一种引人入胜的、多模式的辅助手段,但在ARDS康复人群中的证据仍然有限。方法:在这项单中心、平行组随机对照试验中,88例ARDS康复期患者按1:1的比例随机分为4周增强康复方案,包括沉浸式虚拟现实加上常规护理(n = 44)或单独常规护理(n = 44)。1名对照参与者失访,87名参与者纳入可用病例分析。主要结果是蒙特利尔认知评估(MoCA)评分从基线到4周的变化。次要结果包括36项简短健康调查(SF-36)和医院焦虑和抑郁量表(HADS)得分。主要组间分析采用协方差分析(ANCOVA),随访评分为因变量,基线评分为协变量。结果:观察到年龄、MoCA、SF-36和HADS-A评分的基线失衡。在相应的基线评分调整后,VR组的MoCA评分比对照组有更大的改善(调整组间效应:1.42,95% CI 0.86-1.98; p 0.001)。VR组也表现出较高的SF-36评分(调整后的效果:13.20,95% CI 11.85-14.54; p 0.001)和较低的HADS-A评分(调整后的效果:-2.55,95% CI -3.23至-1.88;p 0.001)。在VR组中,44名参与者中有29名(65.9%)报告对干预非常满意或满意。结论:纳入沉浸式VR的增强康复方案与ARDS早期恢复期间认知、健康相关生活质量和焦虑症状的短期改善有关。由于一揽子计划还需要额外的结构化康复暴露、工作人员注意力、互动、重复活动、反馈和治疗时间,并且由于对照条件与时间或注意力不匹配,因此观察到的差异不能专门归因于VR。这些单中心的、短期的、产生假设的发现需要在时间和注意力匹配的控制下进行更大规模的研究来证实。试验注册:中国临床试验注册中心,ChiCTR2600122078;在完成参与者招募后,于2026年4月8日追溯登记。
期刊介绍:
Annals of Intensive Care is an online peer-reviewed journal that publishes high-quality review articles and original research papers in the field of intensive care medicine. It targets critical care providers including attending physicians, fellows, residents, nurses, and physiotherapists, who aim to enhance their knowledge and provide optimal care for their patients. The journal's articles are included in various prestigious databases such as CAS, Current contents, DOAJ, Embase, Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition, OCLC, PubMed, PubMed Central, Science Citation Index Expanded, SCOPUS, and Summon by Serial Solutions.