[Risk of Failure of Two Methods of Osteosynthesis of Fifth Metacarpal Neck Fracture].

IF 0.6 4区 医学 Q4 ORTHOPEDICS
Kvido Štěpánek, Milan Urban, Radek Bartoška, Petr Gutwald
{"title":"[Risk of Failure of Two Methods of Osteosynthesis of Fifth Metacarpal Neck Fracture].","authors":"Kvido Štěpánek, Milan Urban, Radek Bartoška, Petr Gutwald","doi":"10.55095/achot2026/035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of the study: </strong>Fifth metacarpal neck fractures rank among the most common fractures of the hand skeleton. Only about 10% of these fractures are treated surgically. There are multiple surgical treatment options. This study aims to compare the outcomes of plate osteosynthesis with those of the \"bouquet\" technique.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Two cohorts of patients with fractures to the neck of fifth metacarpal treated at a district hospital and at a university hospital between 2017 and 2022 were evaluated, namely due to a different approach to fracture management. The district hospital cohort included 240 patients (215 men and 25 women). The mean age of patients was 31.5 years (15-91). At the university hospital, 363 patients were treated (323 men, 40 women), with a mean age of 30.3 years (16-87). In both cohorts, men outnumbered women (p < 0.0001). The exclusion criteria were age under 15 years and open fractures.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were differences between the centers in both the indications for and the performance of non-surgical and surgical treatment. At the district center, 48 patients (20%) underwent surgery. All patients were treated using the \"bouquet\" technique. At the university center, 27 patients (7%) underwent surgery. Two different methods were used for osteosynthesis. Plate osteosynthesis prevailed (21 patients), while the \"bouquet\" technique was used less frequently (6 patients). The higher proportion of patients who underwent surgery at the district center was statistically significant (p < 0.0001).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>There are no studies in the current literature that clearly give preference to one method over the others. At both centers, a volar angulation of the peripheral fragment exceeding 30° was considered a radiographic indication for surgical treatment. A high percentage of patients who underwent surgery in the district cohort was due to a different non-surgical treatment approach. The study found no difference in clinical findings after fracture healing between patients treated surgically using the \"bouquet\" technique and those treated with plate osteosynthesis.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Appropriate non-surgical treatment is essential for successful management of boxer's fractures. Physicians who treat musculoskeletal traumas should be adequately trained in this field. Where adequate non-surgical treatment is provided, only a small percentage of fractures require surgery. There are many surgical treatment options available; currently, none can be clearly recommended over the others. When comparing plate osteosynthesis and the \"bouquet\" technique, the authors' experience confirmed the well-known fact that displacement of fragments in the postoperative period can be prevented by adhering to all principles of good surgical practice for each treatment method.</p>","PeriodicalId":6980,"journal":{"name":"Acta chirurgiae orthopaedicae et traumatologiae Cechoslovaca","volume":"93 4","pages":"241-246"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta chirurgiae orthopaedicae et traumatologiae Cechoslovaca","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55095/achot2026/035","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose of the study: Fifth metacarpal neck fractures rank among the most common fractures of the hand skeleton. Only about 10% of these fractures are treated surgically. There are multiple surgical treatment options. This study aims to compare the outcomes of plate osteosynthesis with those of the "bouquet" technique.

Material and methods: Two cohorts of patients with fractures to the neck of fifth metacarpal treated at a district hospital and at a university hospital between 2017 and 2022 were evaluated, namely due to a different approach to fracture management. The district hospital cohort included 240 patients (215 men and 25 women). The mean age of patients was 31.5 years (15-91). At the university hospital, 363 patients were treated (323 men, 40 women), with a mean age of 30.3 years (16-87). In both cohorts, men outnumbered women (p < 0.0001). The exclusion criteria were age under 15 years and open fractures.

Results: There were differences between the centers in both the indications for and the performance of non-surgical and surgical treatment. At the district center, 48 patients (20%) underwent surgery. All patients were treated using the "bouquet" technique. At the university center, 27 patients (7%) underwent surgery. Two different methods were used for osteosynthesis. Plate osteosynthesis prevailed (21 patients), while the "bouquet" technique was used less frequently (6 patients). The higher proportion of patients who underwent surgery at the district center was statistically significant (p < 0.0001).

Discussion: There are no studies in the current literature that clearly give preference to one method over the others. At both centers, a volar angulation of the peripheral fragment exceeding 30° was considered a radiographic indication for surgical treatment. A high percentage of patients who underwent surgery in the district cohort was due to a different non-surgical treatment approach. The study found no difference in clinical findings after fracture healing between patients treated surgically using the "bouquet" technique and those treated with plate osteosynthesis.

Conclusions: Appropriate non-surgical treatment is essential for successful management of boxer's fractures. Physicians who treat musculoskeletal traumas should be adequately trained in this field. Where adequate non-surgical treatment is provided, only a small percentage of fractures require surgery. There are many surgical treatment options available; currently, none can be clearly recommended over the others. When comparing plate osteosynthesis and the "bouquet" technique, the authors' experience confirmed the well-known fact that displacement of fragments in the postoperative period can be prevented by adhering to all principles of good surgical practice for each treatment method.

[两种方法治疗第五掌骨颈骨折失败的风险]。
研究目的:第五掌骨颈骨折是手部骨骼最常见的骨折之一。只有大约10%的骨折通过手术治疗。有多种手术治疗选择。本研究旨在比较钢板内固定与“捧花”技术的效果。材料和方法:对2017年至2022年间在地区医院和大学医院治疗的两组第五掌骨颈部骨折患者进行评估,即由于骨折处理方法不同。地区医院队列包括240名患者(215名男性和25名女性)。患者平均年龄31.5岁(15-91岁)。在大学医院,363名患者接受治疗(323名男性,40名女性),平均年龄为30.3岁(16-87岁)。在这两个队列中,男性多于女性(p < 0.0001)。排除标准为年龄在15岁以下和开放性骨折。结果:各中心在非手术治疗和手术治疗的适应证及疗效方面存在差异。在地区中心,48名患者(20%)接受了手术。所有患者均采用“花束”技术治疗。在大学中心,27名患者(7%)接受了手术。采用两种不同的方法进行骨固定。钢板固定术(21例)盛行,而“捧花”技术较少使用(6例)。在区中心接受手术的患者比例较高,差异有统计学意义(p < 0.0001)。讨论:在目前的文献中,没有研究明确地给予一种方法优于其他方法。在两个中心,周围碎片掌侧角度超过30°被认为是手术治疗的放射学指征。在地区队列中,接受手术的患者的高比例是由于不同的非手术治疗方法。研究发现,骨折愈合后,采用手术“捧束”技术治疗的患者与采用钢板接骨术治疗的患者的临床表现无差异。结论:适当的非手术治疗是成功治疗拳师骨折的关键。治疗肌肉骨骼创伤的医生应该在这一领域接受充分的培训。如果提供了适当的非手术治疗,只有一小部分骨折需要手术。有许多手术治疗选择;目前,没有一种可以明确推荐。在比较钢板内固定和“捧花”技术时,作者的经验证实了一个众所周知的事实,即通过坚持每种治疗方法的所有良好手术规范原则,可以防止术后碎片移位。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
25.00%
发文量
53
期刊介绍: Editorial Board accepts for publication articles, reports from congresses, fellowships, book reviews, reports concerning activities of orthopaedic and other relating specialised societies, reports on anniversaries of outstanding personalities in orthopaedics and announcements of congresses and symposia being prepared. Articles include original papers, case reports and current concepts reviews and recently also instructional lectures.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书