Closing the Governance Gap: Aligning Finance, Assessment, and Disclosure for Climate-Compatible Infrastructure

IF 3.4 3区 社会学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Environmental Policy and Governance Pub Date : 2026-10-02 Epub Date: 2026-07-21 DOI:10.1002/eet.70118
Shivam Srivastava, Chirag Kothari, Usha Iyer-Raniga, Sudhir Misra
{"title":"Closing the Governance Gap: Aligning Finance, Assessment, and Disclosure for Climate-Compatible Infrastructure","authors":"Shivam Srivastava,&nbsp;Chirag Kothari,&nbsp;Usha Iyer-Raniga,&nbsp;Sudhir Misra","doi":"10.1002/eet.70118","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Governments worldwide are advancing climate-compatible infrastructure (CCI) to meet the UN's Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and Paris Agreement targets. Yet implementation remains fragmented and weakly coordinated, limiting transformative impact. We identify a structural gap across three governance functions critical to CCI delivery: financing, performance assessment, and impact disclosure. These functions are governed by distinct and often disconnected systems led respectively by Multilateral Development Banks (MDBs), Infrastructure Rating Tools (IRTs), and Sustainability Reporting Frameworks (SRFs). We propose a systems-based governance model, the “MDB–IRT–SRF” nexus, that enables infrastructure to be more accountable, traceable, and responsive to regional contexts. Drawing on the comparative analysis across six regions (Asia, Africa, Europe, Oceania, North America, and South America), we illustrate that the nexus provides a diagnostic framework applicable across diverse contexts. However, its effectiveness depends on enabling conditions, including institutional capacity, regulatory alignment, and interoperable data systems. Rather than a technical solution alone, realizing this integration requires an incremental institutional shift toward coordinated financing, assessment, and disclosure systems. We argue that stronger alignment across these governance functions can support more credible, measurable, and context-sensitive CCI outcomes.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":47396,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Policy and Governance","volume":"36 5","pages":"1430-1445"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Policy and Governance","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/eet.70118","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/7/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Governments worldwide are advancing climate-compatible infrastructure (CCI) to meet the UN's Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and Paris Agreement targets. Yet implementation remains fragmented and weakly coordinated, limiting transformative impact. We identify a structural gap across three governance functions critical to CCI delivery: financing, performance assessment, and impact disclosure. These functions are governed by distinct and often disconnected systems led respectively by Multilateral Development Banks (MDBs), Infrastructure Rating Tools (IRTs), and Sustainability Reporting Frameworks (SRFs). We propose a systems-based governance model, the “MDB–IRT–SRF” nexus, that enables infrastructure to be more accountable, traceable, and responsive to regional contexts. Drawing on the comparative analysis across six regions (Asia, Africa, Europe, Oceania, North America, and South America), we illustrate that the nexus provides a diagnostic framework applicable across diverse contexts. However, its effectiveness depends on enabling conditions, including institutional capacity, regulatory alignment, and interoperable data systems. Rather than a technical solution alone, realizing this integration requires an incremental institutional shift toward coordinated financing, assessment, and disclosure systems. We argue that stronger alignment across these governance functions can support more credible, measurable, and context-sensitive CCI outcomes.

缩小治理差距:协调气候兼容基础设施的融资、评估和披露
世界各国政府正在推进气候兼容基础设施(CCI),以实现联合国可持续发展目标(sdg)和《巴黎协定》的目标。然而,实施工作仍然支离破碎,协调不力,限制了变革的影响。我们确定了对CCI交付至关重要的三个治理职能之间的结构性差距:融资、绩效评估和影响披露。这些职能由多边开发银行(mdb)、基础设施评级工具(irt)和可持续发展报告框架(srf)分别领导的不同且往往互不关联的系统管理。我们提出了一种基于系统的治理模式,即“MDB-IRT-SRF”关系,它使基础设施更加负责、可追溯,并对地区情况作出反应。通过对六个地区(亚洲、非洲、欧洲、大洋洲、北美和南美)的比较分析,我们说明了这种联系提供了一种适用于不同背景的诊断框架。然而,其有效性取决于有利条件,包括机构能力、监管一致性和可互操作的数据系统。实现这种整合不仅仅是一个技术解决方案,还需要逐步向协调的融资、评估和披露系统转变。我们认为,在这些治理功能之间更强的一致性可以支持更可信、可衡量和上下文敏感的CCI结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Environmental Policy and Governance
Environmental Policy and Governance ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES-
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
13.30%
发文量
67
期刊介绍: Environmental Policy and Governance is an international, inter-disciplinary journal affiliated with the European Society for Ecological Economics (ESEE). The journal seeks to advance interdisciplinary environmental research and its use to support novel solutions in environmental policy and governance. The journal publishes innovative, high quality articles which examine, or are relevant to, the environmental policies that are introduced by governments or the diverse forms of environmental governance that emerge in markets and civil society. The journal includes papers that examine how different forms of policy and governance emerge and exert influence at scales ranging from local to global and in diverse developmental and environmental contexts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书