{"title":"Closing the Governance Gap: Aligning Finance, Assessment, and Disclosure for Climate-Compatible Infrastructure","authors":"Shivam Srivastava, Chirag Kothari, Usha Iyer-Raniga, Sudhir Misra","doi":"10.1002/eet.70118","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Governments worldwide are advancing climate-compatible infrastructure (CCI) to meet the UN's Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and Paris Agreement targets. Yet implementation remains fragmented and weakly coordinated, limiting transformative impact. We identify a structural gap across three governance functions critical to CCI delivery: financing, performance assessment, and impact disclosure. These functions are governed by distinct and often disconnected systems led respectively by Multilateral Development Banks (MDBs), Infrastructure Rating Tools (IRTs), and Sustainability Reporting Frameworks (SRFs). We propose a systems-based governance model, the “MDB–IRT–SRF” nexus, that enables infrastructure to be more accountable, traceable, and responsive to regional contexts. Drawing on the comparative analysis across six regions (Asia, Africa, Europe, Oceania, North America, and South America), we illustrate that the nexus provides a diagnostic framework applicable across diverse contexts. However, its effectiveness depends on enabling conditions, including institutional capacity, regulatory alignment, and interoperable data systems. Rather than a technical solution alone, realizing this integration requires an incremental institutional shift toward coordinated financing, assessment, and disclosure systems. We argue that stronger alignment across these governance functions can support more credible, measurable, and context-sensitive CCI outcomes.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":47396,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Policy and Governance","volume":"36 5","pages":"1430-1445"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Policy and Governance","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/eet.70118","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/7/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Governments worldwide are advancing climate-compatible infrastructure (CCI) to meet the UN's Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and Paris Agreement targets. Yet implementation remains fragmented and weakly coordinated, limiting transformative impact. We identify a structural gap across three governance functions critical to CCI delivery: financing, performance assessment, and impact disclosure. These functions are governed by distinct and often disconnected systems led respectively by Multilateral Development Banks (MDBs), Infrastructure Rating Tools (IRTs), and Sustainability Reporting Frameworks (SRFs). We propose a systems-based governance model, the “MDB–IRT–SRF” nexus, that enables infrastructure to be more accountable, traceable, and responsive to regional contexts. Drawing on the comparative analysis across six regions (Asia, Africa, Europe, Oceania, North America, and South America), we illustrate that the nexus provides a diagnostic framework applicable across diverse contexts. However, its effectiveness depends on enabling conditions, including institutional capacity, regulatory alignment, and interoperable data systems. Rather than a technical solution alone, realizing this integration requires an incremental institutional shift toward coordinated financing, assessment, and disclosure systems. We argue that stronger alignment across these governance functions can support more credible, measurable, and context-sensitive CCI outcomes.
期刊介绍:
Environmental Policy and Governance is an international, inter-disciplinary journal affiliated with the European Society for Ecological Economics (ESEE). The journal seeks to advance interdisciplinary environmental research and its use to support novel solutions in environmental policy and governance. The journal publishes innovative, high quality articles which examine, or are relevant to, the environmental policies that are introduced by governments or the diverse forms of environmental governance that emerge in markets and civil society. The journal includes papers that examine how different forms of policy and governance emerge and exert influence at scales ranging from local to global and in diverse developmental and environmental contexts.