Women's Socioeconomic Advantage Over Their Partners and Relationship Dissolution: A 29-Country Study

IF 3.5 1区 社会学 Q1 FAMILY STUDIES
Journal of Marriage and Family Pub Date : 2026-10-07 Epub Date: 2026-05-30 DOI:10.1111/jomf.70081
Pilar Gonalons-Pons, Allison Dunatchik
{"title":"Women's Socioeconomic Advantage Over Their Partners and Relationship Dissolution: A 29-Country Study","authors":"Pilar Gonalons-Pons,&nbsp;Allison Dunatchik","doi":"10.1111/jomf.70081","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>This study provides a comprehensive analysis of the mechanisms driving the association between women's socioeconomic advantage and the risk of relationship dissolution.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Research consistently finds that different-sex couples in which women have higher socioeconomic status than their partners are more likely to separate. Several competing explanations for this association have been proposed, including the role of gender culture, specialization optimization, partner opportunity structure, and economic mediators. However, robust empirical evidence for these explanations remains elusive.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Method</h3>\n \n <p>This study harmonizes couple-level panel survey data for 29 high-income countries from 2004 to 2020 (<i>N</i> = 544,911 couples). Using hierarchical probability models, it leverages country-level measures on gender norms and other macro-level characteristics to provide new direct tests of key hypothesized mechanisms underpinning the association between women's relative earnings and the risk of separation.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Consistent with prior research, results show that the association between women's socioeconomic advantage and relationship dissolution is positive and statistically significant. But, contrary to expectations, the results do not provide evidence that this association is moderated by gender culture or driven by other common explanations. Instead, the analyses show evidence that this association is stronger among couples with children in the household, suggesting a potential work–family conflict mechanism.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>The study concludes that our understanding of the mechanisms driving this association is incomplete and that more research is necessary to develop new explanations.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48440,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Marriage and Family","volume":"88 5","pages":"1284-1301"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jomf.70081","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Marriage and Family","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jomf.70081","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/5/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

This study provides a comprehensive analysis of the mechanisms driving the association between women's socioeconomic advantage and the risk of relationship dissolution.

Background

Research consistently finds that different-sex couples in which women have higher socioeconomic status than their partners are more likely to separate. Several competing explanations for this association have been proposed, including the role of gender culture, specialization optimization, partner opportunity structure, and economic mediators. However, robust empirical evidence for these explanations remains elusive.

Method

This study harmonizes couple-level panel survey data for 29 high-income countries from 2004 to 2020 (N = 544,911 couples). Using hierarchical probability models, it leverages country-level measures on gender norms and other macro-level characteristics to provide new direct tests of key hypothesized mechanisms underpinning the association between women's relative earnings and the risk of separation.

Results

Consistent with prior research, results show that the association between women's socioeconomic advantage and relationship dissolution is positive and statistically significant. But, contrary to expectations, the results do not provide evidence that this association is moderated by gender culture or driven by other common explanations. Instead, the analyses show evidence that this association is stronger among couples with children in the household, suggesting a potential work–family conflict mechanism.

Conclusion

The study concludes that our understanding of the mechanisms driving this association is incomplete and that more research is necessary to develop new explanations.

女性对其伴侣的社会经济优势和关系破裂:一项29个国家的研究
目的对女性社会经济优势与婚姻破裂风险之间的关系机制进行综合分析。研究一致发现,如果女性的社会经济地位高于其伴侣,那么不同性别的夫妻更有可能分手。对于这一关联,人们提出了几种相互竞争的解释,包括性别文化、专业化优化、伴侣机会结构和经济中介的作用。然而,这些解释的强有力的经验证据仍然难以捉摸。方法本研究统一了29个高收入国家2004 - 2020年的夫妻面板调查数据(N = 544,911对夫妇)。它利用分层概率模型,利用国家一级关于性别规范和其他宏观层面特征的措施,对支持妇女相对收入与分离风险之间关系的关键假设机制提供新的直接检验。结果与先前研究一致,研究结果表明女性社会经济优势与婚姻破裂之间存在显著正相关关系。但是,与预期相反,结果并没有提供证据表明这种联系受到性别文化或其他常见解释的调节。相反,分析显示,有证据表明,这种联系在家里有孩子的夫妇中更为强烈,这表明存在潜在的工作-家庭冲突机制。这项研究的结论是,我们对这种关联的机制的理解是不完整的,需要更多的研究来提出新的解释。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.20
自引率
6.70%
发文量
81
期刊介绍: For more than 70 years, Journal of Marriage and Family (JMF) has been a leading research journal in the family field. JMF features original research and theory, research interpretation and reviews, and critical discussion concerning all aspects of marriage, other forms of close relationships, and families.In 2009, an institutional subscription to Journal of Marriage and Family includes a subscription to Family Relations and Journal of Family Theory & Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书