Giving the Emperor clothes: operationalizing AI ethics principles in corporations

Ann Gregg Skeet, Brian Patrick Green
{"title":"Giving the Emperor clothes: operationalizing AI ethics principles in corporations","authors":"Ann Gregg Skeet,&nbsp;Brian Patrick Green","doi":"10.1007/s43681-026-01348-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Artificial intelligence (AI) technologies raise enormous questions for society and how we should live. For corporations, AI raises questions about how organizations ought to incorporate principles and other forms of ethical guidance into their work. The movement from theory to practice, or “the operationalization question” demands that organizations not only have good intentions, but actual institutionalized approaches towards ethical problem solving. In this paper, we look at the movement from theory to practice, and particularly at the use of principles as a way to guide ethical behavior, considering, first, why implementation of principles is difficult, second, how to move from abstract principles to actionable principles, and third, illustrating this progression through seven real-life AI cases. These seven cases each relate to an ethical principle: (1) protecting human dignity and rights, and the International Baccalaureate exam replacement by algorithm, (2) promoting human well-being, and Amazon warehouse worker injuries, (3) investing in humanity, and the Partnership on AI’s work to bring together AI corporations and civil society, (4) promoting inclusion, and IBM’s response to the Gender Shades study, (5) protecting the environment, and Hugging Face’s tracking AI energy use, (6) maintaining accountability, and the Christchurch, New Zealand mass shooting response by Facebook and Western Digital, (7) and, lastly, promoting transparency, and AI model cards. The cases model the movement from abstract principle to concrete action, and collectively illustrate a pattern that can be repeated in many contexts, thus demonstrating a new possible solution for organizations implementing ethics.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72137,"journal":{"name":"AI and ethics","volume":"6 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s43681-026-01348-0.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AI and ethics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s43681-026-01348-0","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) technologies raise enormous questions for society and how we should live. For corporations, AI raises questions about how organizations ought to incorporate principles and other forms of ethical guidance into their work. The movement from theory to practice, or “the operationalization question” demands that organizations not only have good intentions, but actual institutionalized approaches towards ethical problem solving. In this paper, we look at the movement from theory to practice, and particularly at the use of principles as a way to guide ethical behavior, considering, first, why implementation of principles is difficult, second, how to move from abstract principles to actionable principles, and third, illustrating this progression through seven real-life AI cases. These seven cases each relate to an ethical principle: (1) protecting human dignity and rights, and the International Baccalaureate exam replacement by algorithm, (2) promoting human well-being, and Amazon warehouse worker injuries, (3) investing in humanity, and the Partnership on AI’s work to bring together AI corporations and civil society, (4) promoting inclusion, and IBM’s response to the Gender Shades study, (5) protecting the environment, and Hugging Face’s tracking AI energy use, (6) maintaining accountability, and the Christchurch, New Zealand mass shooting response by Facebook and Western Digital, (7) and, lastly, promoting transparency, and AI model cards. The cases model the movement from abstract principle to concrete action, and collectively illustrate a pattern that can be repeated in many contexts, thus demonstrating a new possible solution for organizations implementing ethics.

给皇帝衣服:在企业中实施人工智能伦理原则
人工智能(AI)技术为社会以及我们应该如何生活提出了巨大的问题。对于企业来说,人工智能提出了一个问题,即组织应该如何将原则和其他形式的道德指导纳入其工作中。从理论到实践,或“操作化问题”的运动要求组织不仅有良好的意图,而且有实际的制度化方法来解决道德问题。在本文中,我们着眼于从理论到实践的运动,特别是使用原则作为指导道德行为的方式,首先考虑为什么原则的实施是困难的,其次,如何从抽象原则转变为可操作的原则,第三,通过七个现实生活中的人工智能案例来说明这一进程。以下七个案例分别涉及一项道德原则:(1)保护人类尊严和权利,以及用算法替代国际文凭考试;(2)促进人类福祉,以及亚马逊仓库工人受伤;(3)投资于人类,以及人工智能合作伙伴关系的工作,将人工智能公司和公民社会团结在一起;(4)促进包容,以及IBM对性别差异研究的回应;(5)保护环境,以及拥抱脸跟踪人工智能能源使用;(6)维持问责制;Facebook和西部数据对新西兰大规模枪击事件的回应(7),最后,促进透明度,以及人工智能模型卡。这些案例对从抽象原则到具体行动的转变进行了建模,并共同说明了一种可以在许多情况下重复的模式,从而为实施道德的组织展示了一种新的可能的解决方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书