Machine learning identification of Pb–Zn deposit types using sphalerite trace-element geochemistry: Insights from a TPE-optimized SVM model and SHAP interpretation

IF 1.4 4区 地球科学 Q3 GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS
Zhongyuan Chen, Tao Ren, Dong Zhao
{"title":"Machine learning identification of Pb–Zn deposit types using sphalerite trace-element geochemistry: Insights from a TPE-optimized SVM model and SHAP interpretation","authors":"Zhongyuan Chen,&nbsp;Tao Ren,&nbsp;Dong Zhao","doi":"10.1007/s11631-026-00889-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The unique geochemical fingerprints of trace-element distribution patterns in sphalerite are particularly useful for discriminating Pb–Zn deposit types. In this study, we developed a high-performance sphalerite classification model for deposit types based on a dataset of sphalerite analyses, using tree-structured Parzen estimator (TPE) optimization with a support vector machine (SVM) algorithm. The dataset comprises 3117 analyses of sphalerite sourced from peer-reviewed publications covering 102 representative Pb–Zn deposits worldwide spanning five major genetic types, including sedimentary exhalative (SEDEX), volcanic massive sulfide (VMS), Mississippi Valley type (MVT), skarn, and epithermal deposits. Each analysis covers 12 critical trace elements (Mn, Fe, Co, Cu, Ga, Ge, Ag, Cd, In, Sn, Sb, and Pb). The optimized model demonstrated exceptional discriminative capability. It achieved a test-set accuracy of 0.9749 and delivered consistent performance across the precision, recall, and F1-score metrics. SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations) interpretability analysis revealed that key indicator elements (Mn, Ge, and Co) are critical for genetic classification, although there are distinct patterns of trace elements across deposit types. Dimensionality-reduction analyses (UMAP and t-SNE) reveal distinct clustering of magmatic-hydrothermal deposits (skarn, VMS, epithermal) and sedimentary-related systems (MVT, SEDEX), reflecting systematic differences in sphalerite trace-element signatures. This methodology was validated by conducting blind, machine-learning-based classification tests on the Fule and Haobugao Pb–Zn deposits. The results suggest that the TPE-optimized SVM model can identify interpretable geochemical patterns in sphalerite, making it an effective tool for distinguishing between different types of Pb–Zn deposits.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7151,"journal":{"name":"Acta Geochimica","volume":"45 5","pages":"1259 - 1275"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Geochimica","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11631-026-00889-9","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The unique geochemical fingerprints of trace-element distribution patterns in sphalerite are particularly useful for discriminating Pb–Zn deposit types. In this study, we developed a high-performance sphalerite classification model for deposit types based on a dataset of sphalerite analyses, using tree-structured Parzen estimator (TPE) optimization with a support vector machine (SVM) algorithm. The dataset comprises 3117 analyses of sphalerite sourced from peer-reviewed publications covering 102 representative Pb–Zn deposits worldwide spanning five major genetic types, including sedimentary exhalative (SEDEX), volcanic massive sulfide (VMS), Mississippi Valley type (MVT), skarn, and epithermal deposits. Each analysis covers 12 critical trace elements (Mn, Fe, Co, Cu, Ga, Ge, Ag, Cd, In, Sn, Sb, and Pb). The optimized model demonstrated exceptional discriminative capability. It achieved a test-set accuracy of 0.9749 and delivered consistent performance across the precision, recall, and F1-score metrics. SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations) interpretability analysis revealed that key indicator elements (Mn, Ge, and Co) are critical for genetic classification, although there are distinct patterns of trace elements across deposit types. Dimensionality-reduction analyses (UMAP and t-SNE) reveal distinct clustering of magmatic-hydrothermal deposits (skarn, VMS, epithermal) and sedimentary-related systems (MVT, SEDEX), reflecting systematic differences in sphalerite trace-element signatures. This methodology was validated by conducting blind, machine-learning-based classification tests on the Fule and Haobugao Pb–Zn deposits. The results suggest that the TPE-optimized SVM model can identify interpretable geochemical patterns in sphalerite, making it an effective tool for distinguishing between different types of Pb–Zn deposits.

利用闪锌矿微量元素地球化学的机器学习识别铅锌矿床类型:来自tpe优化SVM模型和SHAP解释的见解
闪锌矿中微量元素分布模式的独特地球化学指纹图谱对铅锌矿床类型的鉴别具有重要意义。在这项研究中,我们基于闪锌矿分析数据集,利用树结构Parzen估计器(TPE)优化和支持向量机(SVM)算法,开发了一个高性能的闪锌矿矿床类型分类模型。该数据集包括3117份闪锌矿分析,这些闪锌矿来自同行评审的出版物,涵盖全球102个具有代表性的铅锌矿床,涵盖5种主要成因类型,包括沉积喷发型(SEDEX)、火山质硫化物型(VMS)、密西西比河谷型(MVT)、矽卡岩型和浅成热液矿床。每个分析包括12个关键的微量元素(Mn, Fe, Co, Cu, Ga, Ge, Ag, Cd, In, Sn, Sb和Pb)。优化后的模型具有优异的判别能力。它实现了0.9749的测试集准确度,并在精度、召回率和f1得分指标上提供了一致的性能。SHapley加性解释(SHapley Additive explanatory)可解释性分析表明,尽管不同矿床类型的微量元素分布模式不同,但关键指示元素(Mn、Ge和Co)对成因分类至关重要。降维分析(UMAP和t-SNE)揭示了岩浆-热液矿床(矽卡岩、VMS、浅成热液)和沉积相关系统(MVT、SEDEX)的明显聚集,反映了闪锌矿微量元素特征的系统性差异。通过对富乐和Haobugao铅锌矿床进行基于机器学习的盲分类测试,验证了该方法。结果表明,tpe优化后的SVM模型能够识别闪锌矿可解释的地球化学模式,是区分不同类型铅锌矿床的有效工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta Geochimica
Acta Geochimica GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS-
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
6.20%
发文量
1134
期刊介绍: Acta Geochimica serves as the international forum for essential research on geochemistry, the science that uses the tools and principles of chemistry to explain the mechanisms behind major geological systems such as the Earth‘s crust, its oceans and the entire Solar System, as well as a number of processes including mantle convection, the formation of planets and the origins of granite and basalt. The journal focuses on, but is not limited to the following aspects: • Cosmochemistry • Mantle Geochemistry • Ore-deposit Geochemistry • Organic Geochemistry • Environmental Geochemistry • Computational Geochemistry • Isotope Geochemistry • NanoGeochemistry All research articles published in this journal have undergone rigorous peer review. In addition to original research articles, Acta Geochimica publishes reviews and short communications, aiming to rapidly disseminate the research results of timely interest, and comprehensive reviews of emerging topics in all the areas of geochemistry.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书