A pluralistic view on AI ethics: perspectives from Buen Vivir

Dorine Eva van Norren
{"title":"A pluralistic view on AI ethics: perspectives from Buen Vivir","authors":"Dorine Eva van Norren","doi":"10.1007/s43681-026-01403-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Cosmovisions of the Global South need to find a place in AI regulation, dominated by the Global North, to contextualize AI and to foster pluralistic global ethical AI. The worldwide UNESCO recommendation for the ethics of AI incorporates flourishing of all life, but still takes a human centric/rights approach. Indigenous Buen Vivir fosters circular, biocentric, participatory, thinking focusing on equality, integrality of life and rights of Nature. Buen Vivir demands a biocentric whole-of system approach across the tech stack; addressing unequal power relations and economic inequality by AI, going beyond ensuring non-discrimination. It highlights participatory consensus decision-making for AI with a voice for nature. Work is considered as giving meaning to life, and social bonds and community as cardinal for human wellbeing. This puts into question the tendency to implement AI to make human work and relations redundant. Buen Vivir can help programmers of quantum computers think in three-some (complementary opposition) instead of binary opposition, a topic for future research.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72137,"journal":{"name":"AI and ethics","volume":"6 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s43681-026-01403-w.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AI and ethics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s43681-026-01403-w","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Cosmovisions of the Global South need to find a place in AI regulation, dominated by the Global North, to contextualize AI and to foster pluralistic global ethical AI. The worldwide UNESCO recommendation for the ethics of AI incorporates flourishing of all life, but still takes a human centric/rights approach. Indigenous Buen Vivir fosters circular, biocentric, participatory, thinking focusing on equality, integrality of life and rights of Nature. Buen Vivir demands a biocentric whole-of system approach across the tech stack; addressing unequal power relations and economic inequality by AI, going beyond ensuring non-discrimination. It highlights participatory consensus decision-making for AI with a voice for nature. Work is considered as giving meaning to life, and social bonds and community as cardinal for human wellbeing. This puts into question the tendency to implement AI to make human work and relations redundant. Buen Vivir can help programmers of quantum computers think in three-some (complementary opposition) instead of binary opposition, a topic for future research.

人工智能伦理的多元观:来自《幸福生活》的视角
全球南方的世界观需要在由全球北方主导的人工智能监管中找到一席之地,以便将人工智能置于背景下,并促进多元化的全球道德人工智能。联合国教科文组织关于人工智能伦理的全球建议包含了所有生命的繁荣,但仍然采取了以人为本/权利的方法。土著的Buen Vivir提倡循环的、以生物为中心的、参与式的思维,注重平等、生命的完整性和自然的权利。Buen Vivir要求在整个技术堆栈中采用以生物为中心的整体系统方法;通过人工智能解决不平等的权力关系和经济不平等问题,不仅仅是确保不歧视。它强调人工智能的参与性共识决策,为自然发声。工作被认为赋予了生命意义,社会纽带和社区是人类幸福的基础。这就对人工智能使人类工作和人际关系变得多余的趋势提出了质疑。Buen Vivir可以帮助量子计算机的程序员以三人(互补对立)的方式思考,而不是二元对立,这是未来研究的主题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书