{"title":"Controlled ensemble null tests of dynamical dark energy hints: single-probe recovery of \\(\\Lambda \\)CDM with BAO, compressed-CMB, and SNe mocks","authors":"Seokcheon Lee","doi":"10.1140/epjc/s10052-026-16374-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Recent combined cosmological analyses have reported mild apparent departures from the cosmological-constant equation of state. Such departures are difficult to interpret because BAO, compressed CMB distance priors, and Type Ia supernovae constrain different projections of the expansion history and carry different calibration degeneracies. We perform controlled ensemble null tests using observable-level Gaussian BAO-like, CMB-like, and supernova-like mock datasets generated from a common fiducial flat <span>\\(\\Lambda \\)</span>CDM cosmology. The aim is to determine whether each constituent single-probe likelihood block can produce an apparent DDE-like marginalized-posterior displacement, or spuriously exclude the fiducial model, through its own degeneracy structure and calibration freedom. The analysis adopts probe-adapted parameterizations for the BAO scale, the CMB physical matter density, and the supernova normalization degeneracy. With explicit convergence diagnostics, percentile-based posterior coverage tests, and realization-level pull statistics, none of the three single-probe analyses spuriously excludes the fiducial input at the 95% level. All completed BAO and SNe chains enter their final ensembles after adaptive extension of the originally rejected runs; for compressed CMB, a mock-data-space audit finds no detectable selection dependence within the sensitivity of the 208-mock ensemble. The compressed CMB-only likelihood nevertheless exhibits stable displaced marginalized medians together with broad late-time posterior intervals, illustrating that posterior location and model exclusion are distinct diagnostics. These results show that a displaced marginalized posterior in a single realization is not, by itself, evidence for dynamical dark energy. Such shifts must be interpreted through mock-ensemble recovery, convergence diagnostics, and the probe-dependent geometry of the likelihood.\n</p></div>","PeriodicalId":788,"journal":{"name":"The European Physical Journal C","volume":"86 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1140/epjc/s10052-026-16374-9.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The European Physical Journal C","FirstCategoryId":"4","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1140/epjc/s10052-026-16374-9","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHYSICS, PARTICLES & FIELDS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Recent combined cosmological analyses have reported mild apparent departures from the cosmological-constant equation of state. Such departures are difficult to interpret because BAO, compressed CMB distance priors, and Type Ia supernovae constrain different projections of the expansion history and carry different calibration degeneracies. We perform controlled ensemble null tests using observable-level Gaussian BAO-like, CMB-like, and supernova-like mock datasets generated from a common fiducial flat \(\Lambda \)CDM cosmology. The aim is to determine whether each constituent single-probe likelihood block can produce an apparent DDE-like marginalized-posterior displacement, or spuriously exclude the fiducial model, through its own degeneracy structure and calibration freedom. The analysis adopts probe-adapted parameterizations for the BAO scale, the CMB physical matter density, and the supernova normalization degeneracy. With explicit convergence diagnostics, percentile-based posterior coverage tests, and realization-level pull statistics, none of the three single-probe analyses spuriously excludes the fiducial input at the 95% level. All completed BAO and SNe chains enter their final ensembles after adaptive extension of the originally rejected runs; for compressed CMB, a mock-data-space audit finds no detectable selection dependence within the sensitivity of the 208-mock ensemble. The compressed CMB-only likelihood nevertheless exhibits stable displaced marginalized medians together with broad late-time posterior intervals, illustrating that posterior location and model exclusion are distinct diagnostics. These results show that a displaced marginalized posterior in a single realization is not, by itself, evidence for dynamical dark energy. Such shifts must be interpreted through mock-ensemble recovery, convergence diagnostics, and the probe-dependent geometry of the likelihood.
最近的综合宇宙学分析报告了轻微的明显偏离宇宙常数状态方程。这种偏离很难解释,因为BAO、压缩的CMB距离先验和Ia型超新星约束了膨胀历史的不同投影,并携带了不同的校准简并。我们使用可观测水平的高斯类bao、类cmb和类超新星模拟数据集进行了受控的集合零检验,这些模拟数据集来自一个共同的基准平面\(\Lambda \) CDM宇宙学。目的是确定每个组成单探针似然块是否可以通过其自身的简并结构和校准自由度产生明显的dde样的边缘化后验位移,或者虚假地排除基准模型。对BAO尺度、CMB物理物质密度和超新星归一化简并度采用探针适应的参数化分析。通过明确的收敛诊断,基于百分位数的后验覆盖率测试和实现水平的拉统计,三个单探针分析都没有虚假地排除95的基准输入% level. All completed BAO and SNe chains enter their final ensembles after adaptive extension of the originally rejected runs; for compressed CMB, a mock-data-space audit finds no detectable selection dependence within the sensitivity of the 208-mock ensemble. The compressed CMB-only likelihood nevertheless exhibits stable displaced marginalized medians together with broad late-time posterior intervals, illustrating that posterior location and model exclusion are distinct diagnostics. These results show that a displaced marginalized posterior in a single realization is not, by itself, evidence for dynamical dark energy. Such shifts must be interpreted through mock-ensemble recovery, convergence diagnostics, and the probe-dependent geometry of the likelihood.
期刊介绍:
Experimental Physics I: Accelerator Based High-Energy Physics
Hadron and lepton collider physics
Lepton-nucleon scattering
High-energy nuclear reactions
Standard model precision tests
Search for new physics beyond the standard model
Heavy flavour physics
Neutrino properties
Particle detector developments
Computational methods and analysis tools
Experimental Physics II: Astroparticle Physics
Dark matter searches
High-energy cosmic rays
Double beta decay
Long baseline neutrino experiments
Neutrino astronomy
Axions and other weakly interacting light particles
Gravitational waves and observational cosmology
Particle detector developments
Computational methods and analysis tools
Theoretical Physics I: Phenomenology of the Standard Model and Beyond
Electroweak interactions
Quantum chromo dynamics
Heavy quark physics and quark flavour mixing
Neutrino physics
Phenomenology of astro- and cosmoparticle physics
Meson spectroscopy and non-perturbative QCD
Low-energy effective field theories
Lattice field theory
High temperature QCD and heavy ion physics
Phenomenology of supersymmetric extensions of the SM
Phenomenology of non-supersymmetric extensions of the SM
Model building and alternative models of electroweak symmetry breaking
Flavour physics beyond the SM
Computational algorithms and tools...etc.