Priority-Based Conflict Resolution for Manned and Unmanned Aircraft Integrated Operations

IF 9.1 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, CIVIL
Zhaoxuan Liu;Kaiquan Cai;Yongwen Zhu;Kanglin Liu
{"title":"Priority-Based Conflict Resolution for Manned and Unmanned Aircraft Integrated Operations","authors":"Zhaoxuan Liu;Kaiquan Cai;Yongwen Zhu;Kanglin Liu","doi":"10.1109/TITS.2026.3719353","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Integration of Unmanned Aircraft Systems into the airspace is one of the major challenges in global air traffic management. Unlike previous conflict resolution methods intended solely for a specific type of aircraft, either manned or unmanned, this paper develops a priority-based approach for manned and unmanned aircraft resolution coordination in nonsegregated airspace. The motivation is to maximize the resolution efficiency profit of a priority ranking mechanism, where the most conflict-influential aircraft are handled first with aircraft heterogeneity considered. To support such mechanism, complex relations among multiple aircraft need to be analyzed for the determination of the deconflicting aircraft and the corresponding resolution order. First, aircraft priorities are allocated by an extended PageRank algorithm, where influential aircraft assume larger values and more maneuver responsibilities for deconfliction. The influence of aircraft is determined by its heterogeneous attributes (e.g., vehicle type, onboard system capability, mission category, health state) and its conflict severity in the overall conflict scenario. Next, feasible resolution strategies, including speed and heading maneuver options, are illustrated in the solution space diagram according to aircraft priority order. For final maneuver decision-making, the satisficing game theory is applied to ensure maneuver optimality both in terms of safety (e.g., conflict risk) and efficiency (e.g., adjustment cost). Specifically, effects of maneuver delay and secondary conflict are also incorporated to ensure maneuver utility. Simulation results verify the improved approach capability under various integrated operation scenarios. As a result, an efficient resolution is achieved with minimal aircraft maneuvers and deviations.","PeriodicalId":13416,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems","volume":"27 10","pages":"12043-12062"},"PeriodicalIF":9.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/11647248/","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/8/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Integration of Unmanned Aircraft Systems into the airspace is one of the major challenges in global air traffic management. Unlike previous conflict resolution methods intended solely for a specific type of aircraft, either manned or unmanned, this paper develops a priority-based approach for manned and unmanned aircraft resolution coordination in nonsegregated airspace. The motivation is to maximize the resolution efficiency profit of a priority ranking mechanism, where the most conflict-influential aircraft are handled first with aircraft heterogeneity considered. To support such mechanism, complex relations among multiple aircraft need to be analyzed for the determination of the deconflicting aircraft and the corresponding resolution order. First, aircraft priorities are allocated by an extended PageRank algorithm, where influential aircraft assume larger values and more maneuver responsibilities for deconfliction. The influence of aircraft is determined by its heterogeneous attributes (e.g., vehicle type, onboard system capability, mission category, health state) and its conflict severity in the overall conflict scenario. Next, feasible resolution strategies, including speed and heading maneuver options, are illustrated in the solution space diagram according to aircraft priority order. For final maneuver decision-making, the satisficing game theory is applied to ensure maneuver optimality both in terms of safety (e.g., conflict risk) and efficiency (e.g., adjustment cost). Specifically, effects of maneuver delay and secondary conflict are also incorporated to ensure maneuver utility. Simulation results verify the improved approach capability under various integrated operation scenarios. As a result, an efficient resolution is achieved with minimal aircraft maneuvers and deviations.
基于优先级的有人无人机综合作战冲突解决
无人驾驶飞机系统在空域的集成是全球空中交通管理的主要挑战之一。与以往的冲突解决方法不同,本文开发了一种基于优先级的方法,用于非隔离空域中有人驾驶和无人驾驶飞机的解决协调。考虑到飞机的非均质性,优先处理对冲突影响最大的飞机,使优先排序机制的解决效率利润最大化。为了支持这一机制,需要分析多架飞机之间的复杂关系,确定去冲突飞机和相应的解决顺序。首先,采用扩展的PageRank算法分配飞机优先级,其中有影响力的飞机承担更大的值和更多的机动责任来消除冲突。飞机的影响是由其异构属性(如车辆类型、机载系统能力、任务类别、健康状态)及其在整体冲突情景中的冲突严重程度决定的。其次,根据飞机的优先级顺序,在解空间图中给出了可行的解决策略,包括速度和航向机动选项。在最后的机动决策中,运用满意博弈论来保证机动在安全(如冲突风险)和效率(如调整成本)两方面的最优性。具体来说,考虑了机动延迟和二次冲突的影响,保证了机动的有效性。仿真结果验证了该方法在多种综合作战场景下的进近能力。因此,以最小的飞机机动和偏差实现了有效的解决方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems
IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems 工程技术-工程:电子与电气
CiteScore
14.80
自引率
12.90%
发文量
1872
审稿时长
7.5 months
期刊介绍: The theoretical, experimental and operational aspects of electrical and electronics engineering and information technologies as applied to Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS). Intelligent Transportation Systems are defined as those systems utilizing synergistic technologies and systems engineering concepts to develop and improve transportation systems of all kinds. The scope of this interdisciplinary activity includes the promotion, consolidation and coordination of ITS technical activities among IEEE entities, and providing a focus for cooperative activities, both internally and externally.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书