Efficacy of tapering biologics and JAK inhibitors in rheumatoid arthritis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

IF 1.5 Q4 RHEUMATOLOGY
Reumatologia Clinica Pub Date : 2026-10-01 Epub Date: 2026-06-16 DOI:10.1016/j.reuma.2026.502224
Sandra Rotea-Salvo, Laura Galindo, Belén Acasuso-Pardo de Vera, Vanesa Balboa-Barreiro, Luis Ramudo-Cela, Maite Silva-Díaz, Natividad Oreiro-Villar, Francisco J. De Toro-Santos, Isabel Martín-Herranz, Francisco J. Blanco
{"title":"Efficacy of tapering biologics and JAK inhibitors in rheumatoid arthritis: A systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Sandra Rotea-Salvo,&nbsp;Laura Galindo,&nbsp;Belén Acasuso-Pardo de Vera,&nbsp;Vanesa Balboa-Barreiro,&nbsp;Luis Ramudo-Cela,&nbsp;Maite Silva-Díaz,&nbsp;Natividad Oreiro-Villar,&nbsp;Francisco J. De Toro-Santos,&nbsp;Isabel Martín-Herranz,&nbsp;Francisco J. Blanco","doi":"10.1016/j.reuma.2026.502224","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This study assessed the evidence on the efficacy of tapering anti-TNF, JAK inhibitors, and tocilizumab in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>In February 2024, a systematic review was conducted by searching Medline, Embase, Web of Sciences, and the Cochrane Library for randomized controlled trials comparing the efficacy of tapering vs standard treatment. The outcomes evaluated were the maintenance of low disease activity (LDA), remission, and flare-ups. A meta-analysis was conducted when data were available. The risk of bias was assessed using RoB 2. The study was registered on PROSPERO and conducted in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 2861 records were identified, with 1638 records screened after removing duplicates. Finally, fifteen studies involving 2782 patients were included. Follow-up ranged from 6 months to 3.5 years. Tapering anti-TNF did not affect LDA maintenance while showing a lower probability of maintaining remission (RR 0.69, 95% CI 0.57–0.84) and a higher risk of flare-ups (RR 1.96, 95% CI 1.57–2.45). Tapering JAK inhibitors showed a decreased probability of maintaining LDA (RR 0.83, 95% CI 0.76–0.91) and remission (RR 0.86, 95% CI 0.75–0.99), and more frequent and earlier flares. Tapering tocilizumab also resulted in a lower probability of maintaining LDA or remission and a higher risk of flares. Several included studies presented a risk of bias, mainly related to outcome measurement and open-label designs.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Although tapering anti-TNF did not affect LDA maintenance, due to the increased risk of flare-ups and reduced remission probability, routine dose tapering of anti-TNF, JAK inhibitors, and tocilizumab for patients with RA is not recommended in all of them. Identifying patients who may benefit from tapering is crucial.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47115,"journal":{"name":"Reumatologia Clinica","volume":"22 8","pages":"Article 502224"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reumatologia Clinica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1699258X2600166X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/6/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

This study assessed the evidence on the efficacy of tapering anti-TNF, JAK inhibitors, and tocilizumab in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

Methods

In February 2024, a systematic review was conducted by searching Medline, Embase, Web of Sciences, and the Cochrane Library for randomized controlled trials comparing the efficacy of tapering vs standard treatment. The outcomes evaluated were the maintenance of low disease activity (LDA), remission, and flare-ups. A meta-analysis was conducted when data were available. The risk of bias was assessed using RoB 2. The study was registered on PROSPERO and conducted in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines.

Results

A total of 2861 records were identified, with 1638 records screened after removing duplicates. Finally, fifteen studies involving 2782 patients were included. Follow-up ranged from 6 months to 3.5 years. Tapering anti-TNF did not affect LDA maintenance while showing a lower probability of maintaining remission (RR 0.69, 95% CI 0.57–0.84) and a higher risk of flare-ups (RR 1.96, 95% CI 1.57–2.45). Tapering JAK inhibitors showed a decreased probability of maintaining LDA (RR 0.83, 95% CI 0.76–0.91) and remission (RR 0.86, 95% CI 0.75–0.99), and more frequent and earlier flares. Tapering tocilizumab also resulted in a lower probability of maintaining LDA or remission and a higher risk of flares. Several included studies presented a risk of bias, mainly related to outcome measurement and open-label designs.

Conclusion

Although tapering anti-TNF did not affect LDA maintenance, due to the increased risk of flare-ups and reduced remission probability, routine dose tapering of anti-TNF, JAK inhibitors, and tocilizumab for patients with RA is not recommended in all of them. Identifying patients who may benefit from tapering is crucial.
锥形生物制剂和JAK抑制剂治疗类风湿性关节炎的疗效:一项系统综述和荟萃分析
目的:本研究评估渐减抗tnf、JAK抑制剂和tocilizumab治疗类风湿性关节炎(RA)的疗效。方法于2024年2月,通过检索Medline、Embase、Web of Sciences和Cochrane Library进行系统评价,比较减量治疗与标准治疗的疗效。评估的结果是维持低疾病活动性(LDA)、缓解和发作。当数据可用时进行荟萃分析。偏倚风险采用RoB 2进行评估。该研究已在PROSPERO上注册,并按照PRISMA的指导方针进行。结果共筛选出2861条记录,剔除重复后筛选出1638条记录。最后,纳入了15项研究,涉及2782例患者。随访时间为6个月至3.5年。逐渐减少抗肿瘤坏死因子不影响LDA的维持,但显示维持缓解的可能性较低(RR 0.69, 95% CI 0.57-0.84),而爆发的风险较高(RR 1.96, 95% CI 1.57-2.45)。逐渐减少的JAK抑制剂显示维持LDA (RR 0.83, 95% CI 0.76-0.91)和缓解(RR 0.86, 95% CI 0.75-0.99)的可能性降低,并且更频繁和更早的耀斑。逐渐减少tocilizumab也导致维持LDA或缓解的可能性较低,并导致更高的耀斑风险。几项纳入的研究存在偏倚风险,主要与结果测量和开放标签设计有关。结论:虽然逐渐减少抗tnf不影响LDA维持,但由于发作风险增加和缓解概率降低,并非所有RA患者都推荐使用常规剂量逐渐减少抗tnf、JAK抑制剂和托珠单抗。确定哪些患者可能从减量中受益是至关重要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Reumatologia Clinica
Reumatologia Clinica RHEUMATOLOGY-
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
6.70%
发文量
105
审稿时长
54 days
期刊介绍: Una gran revista para cubrir eficazmente las necesidades de conocimientos en una patología de etiología, expresividad clínica y tratamiento tan amplios. Además es La Publicación Oficial de la Sociedad Española de Reumatología y del Colegio Mexicano de Reumatología y está incluida en los más prestigiosos índices de referencia en medicina.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书