A Scoping Review of the Effectiveness of Remote Microphones in Classrooms on Children's Listening, Learning, and Well-Being Applying the Listen to Learn for Life Assessment Framework

IF 3 3区 医学 Q1 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY
Kiri Mealings
{"title":"A Scoping Review of the Effectiveness of Remote Microphones in Classrooms on Children's Listening, Learning, and Well-Being Applying the Listen to Learn for Life Assessment Framework","authors":"Kiri Mealings","doi":"10.1044/2026_lshss-26-00031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: The aim of this scoping review article was to understand the effectiveness of remote microphones in classrooms on listening, learning, and well-being for children aged 0–18 years. Method: This scoping review article followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews. The PICO (population, intervention, comparison, outcome) framework was used to outline the eligibility criteria. Web of Science, PsycInfo, MEDLINE, and PubMed were searched on November 17, 2025. Eligible studies were charted according to the population; the comparison (no device vs. device, device vs. device); the measure used to assess listening, learning, or well-being; the findings of the study; and the effect of the remote microphone on children's listening, learning, or well-being. Results: A total of 686 papers were returned in the search after removing duplicates. Of these, 66 papers met the criteria to be included in the review. Children with hearing loss was the most studied population, and listening was the most studied outcome. Conclusions: Remote microphones tend to provide benefit to classroom listening in all populations investigated, so they should be recommended in the classroom for children who may be struggling to listen. They can also provide learning and well-being benefits to some populations, although this was less studied and stigma could be an issue. Remote microphones were only beneficial when the person wearing the microphone was speaking. More research is needed on using remote microphones where there are multiple speakers and in group work scenarios, but their benefits in lecture-style teaching were apparent from this review article. Supplemental Material: https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.34071150","PeriodicalId":54326,"journal":{"name":"Language Speech and Hearing Services in Schools","volume":"26 1","pages":"1-21"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Language Speech and Hearing Services in Schools","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1044/2026_lshss-26-00031","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this scoping review article was to understand the effectiveness of remote microphones in classrooms on listening, learning, and well-being for children aged 0–18 years. Method: This scoping review article followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews. The PICO (population, intervention, comparison, outcome) framework was used to outline the eligibility criteria. Web of Science, PsycInfo, MEDLINE, and PubMed were searched on November 17, 2025. Eligible studies were charted according to the population; the comparison (no device vs. device, device vs. device); the measure used to assess listening, learning, or well-being; the findings of the study; and the effect of the remote microphone on children's listening, learning, or well-being. Results: A total of 686 papers were returned in the search after removing duplicates. Of these, 66 papers met the criteria to be included in the review. Children with hearing loss was the most studied population, and listening was the most studied outcome. Conclusions: Remote microphones tend to provide benefit to classroom listening in all populations investigated, so they should be recommended in the classroom for children who may be struggling to listen. They can also provide learning and well-being benefits to some populations, although this was less studied and stigma could be an issue. Remote microphones were only beneficial when the person wearing the microphone was speaking. More research is needed on using remote microphones where there are multiple speakers and in group work scenarios, but their benefits in lecture-style teaching were apparent from this review article. Supplemental Material: https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.34071150
应用“听以学为终身”评估框架,对教室中远程麦克风对儿童听力、学习和幸福感的有效性进行范围审查
目的:这篇范围回顾文章的目的是了解教室中远程麦克风对0-18岁儿童听力、学习和幸福感的有效性。方法:这篇范围评价文章遵循了系统评价的首选报告项目和范围评价的元分析扩展。PICO(人口、干预、比较、结果)框架用于概述入选标准。Web of Science, PsycInfo, MEDLINE和PubMed在2025年11月17日进行了搜索。符合条件的研究根据人群绘制图表;比较(无设备vs.设备,设备vs.设备);听力:用来评估听力、学习或健康状况的标准;研究结果;以及远程麦克风对儿童听力、学习或幸福感的影响。结果:剔除重复后,共检索到686篇论文。其中,66篇论文符合评审标准。听力损失儿童是研究最多的人群,听力是研究最多的结果。结论:在所有被调查的人群中,远程麦克风倾向于为课堂听力提供好处,因此应该推荐在课堂上为听力困难的儿童使用。它们还可以为一些人群提供学习和福祉,尽管这方面的研究较少,污名化可能是一个问题。远程麦克风只有在戴着麦克风的人说话时才有用。在有多个扬声器和小组工作的情况下使用远程麦克风还需要更多的研究,但从这篇综述文章中可以明显看出,远程麦克风在讲课式教学中的好处。补充资料:https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.34071150
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Language Speech and Hearing Services in Schools
Language Speech and Hearing Services in Schools Social Sciences-Linguistics and Language
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
12.50%
发文量
165
期刊介绍: Mission: LSHSS publishes peer-reviewed research and other scholarly articles pertaining to the practice of audiology and speech-language pathology in the schools, focusing on children and adolescents. The journal is an international outlet for clinical research and is designed to promote development and analysis of approaches concerning the delivery of services to the school-aged population. LSHSS seeks to advance evidence-based practice by disseminating the results of new studies as well as providing a forum for critical reviews and meta-analyses of previously published work. Scope: The broad field of audiology and speech-language pathology as practiced in schools, including aural rehabilitation; augmentative and alternative communication; childhood apraxia of speech; classroom acoustics; cognitive impairment; craniofacial disorders; fluency disorders; hearing-assistive technology; language disorders; literacy disorders including reading, writing, and spelling; motor speech disorders; speech sound disorders; swallowing, dysphagia, and feeding disorders; voice disorders.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书