Centering Youth Voice in Psychiatric Residential Treatment Research: Lessons from the Families in Transition Study

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q2 SOCIAL WORK
Sophie Berger,Susan M. Breitenstein,Nathan P. Helsabeck,Kayla Herbell
{"title":"Centering Youth Voice in Psychiatric Residential Treatment Research: Lessons from the Families in Transition Study","authors":"Sophie Berger,Susan M. Breitenstein,Nathan P. Helsabeck,Kayla Herbell","doi":"10.1007/s10560-026-01194-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Psychiatric residential treatment (RT) is one of the most restrictive levels of care for youth with severe emotional and behavioral challenges. Despite the complex needs of youth involved in RT, their perspectives remain underrepresented in research, limiting knowledge regarding approaches for engaging this population in research. This paper describes findings from the Families in Transition (FIT) Study, a randomized controlled trial that evaluated a group-based behavioral parent training program for parents of youth in RT. The current study was conceptually framed as a feasibility study of engaging youth in RT research. Data were collected from parents and youth at baseline, 6 weeks, and 6 months using measures of emotional and behavioral functioning, placement restrictiveness, and mental health symptoms. Feasibility was assessed through recruitment, enrollment, and retention, as well as barriers encountered during youth engagement. Although 64 parents enrolled in the parent study, only five youth enrolled in the youth component. Review of recruitment records and study notes identified multiple barriers to youth participation, including challenges associated with recruiting youth while residing in RT, parent apprehension regarding participation burden and emotional distress, and difficulties related to remote data collection. Procedural adaptations included prioritizing post-discharge recruitment, flexible scheduling, enhanced communication with parents, and implementation of extensive safety protocols. As a secondary exploratory objective, parent and youth responses on shared measures were compared descriptively. Although based on a small sample, parent and youth reports differed in their perceptions of emotional and behavioral concerns and placement restrictiveness. Findings highlight the challenges of engaging youth in RT in research and underscore the importance of collaboration, flexible procedures, and innovative approaches to incorporating youth voice in mental health research.","PeriodicalId":51512,"journal":{"name":"Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal","volume":"9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10560-026-01194-3","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIAL WORK","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Psychiatric residential treatment (RT) is one of the most restrictive levels of care for youth with severe emotional and behavioral challenges. Despite the complex needs of youth involved in RT, their perspectives remain underrepresented in research, limiting knowledge regarding approaches for engaging this population in research. This paper describes findings from the Families in Transition (FIT) Study, a randomized controlled trial that evaluated a group-based behavioral parent training program for parents of youth in RT. The current study was conceptually framed as a feasibility study of engaging youth in RT research. Data were collected from parents and youth at baseline, 6 weeks, and 6 months using measures of emotional and behavioral functioning, placement restrictiveness, and mental health symptoms. Feasibility was assessed through recruitment, enrollment, and retention, as well as barriers encountered during youth engagement. Although 64 parents enrolled in the parent study, only five youth enrolled in the youth component. Review of recruitment records and study notes identified multiple barriers to youth participation, including challenges associated with recruiting youth while residing in RT, parent apprehension regarding participation burden and emotional distress, and difficulties related to remote data collection. Procedural adaptations included prioritizing post-discharge recruitment, flexible scheduling, enhanced communication with parents, and implementation of extensive safety protocols. As a secondary exploratory objective, parent and youth responses on shared measures were compared descriptively. Although based on a small sample, parent and youth reports differed in their perceptions of emotional and behavioral concerns and placement restrictiveness. Findings highlight the challenges of engaging youth in RT in research and underscore the importance of collaboration, flexible procedures, and innovative approaches to incorporating youth voice in mental health research.
以青少年声音为中心的精神科住院治疗研究:来自转型家庭研究的启示
精神科住院治疗(RT)是对具有严重情绪和行为挑战的青少年的最严格的护理水平之一。尽管参与RT的年轻人有复杂的需求,但他们的观点在研究中仍然没有得到充分的代表,这限制了有关让这一人群参与研究的方法的知识。本文描述了过渡家庭(FIT)研究的结果,这是一项随机对照试验,评估了一项基于群体的青少年父母行为训练计划。目前的研究在概念上被框架为一项让青少年参与到过渡家庭研究中的可行性研究。通过情绪和行为功能、安置限制和心理健康症状的测量,在基线、6周和6个月时从父母和青少年中收集数据。通过招募、注册和保留以及青年参与过程中遇到的障碍来评估可行性。虽然有64位家长参加了家长研究,但只有5位青少年参加了青少年部分。对招募记录和研究笔记的回顾发现了青少年参与的多重障碍,包括与居住在RT的青少年招募相关的挑战,父母对参与负担和情绪困扰的担忧,以及与远程数据收集相关的困难。程序调整包括优先考虑出院后招募、灵活安排、加强与家长的沟通以及实施广泛的安全协议。作为次要的探索性目标,父母和青少年对共享措施的反应进行了描述性的比较。虽然基于小样本,但父母和青少年的报告在他们对情感和行为问题以及安置限制的看法上存在差异。研究结果强调了让青年参与心理健康研究的挑战,并强调了合作、灵活的程序和创新方法对将青年的声音纳入心理健康研究的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
89
期刊介绍: The Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal (CASW) features original articles that focus on social work practice with children, adolescents, and their families. Topics include issues affecting a variety of specific populations in special settings.  CASW welcomes a range of scholarly contributions focused on children and adolescents, including theoretical papers, narrative case studies, historical analyses, traditional reviews of the literature, descriptive studies, single-system research designs, correlational investigations, methodological works, pre-experimental, quasi-experimental and experimental evaluations, meta-analyses and systematic reviews. Manuscripts involving qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods are welcome to be submitted, as are papers grounded in one or more theoretical orientations, or those that are not based on any formal theory. CASW values different disciplines and interdisciplinary work that informs social work practice and policy. Authors from public health, nursing, psychology, sociology, and other disciplines are encouraged to submit manuscripts. All manuscripts should include specific implications for social work policy and practice with children and adolescents. Appropriate fields of practice include interpersonal practice, small groups, families, organizations, communities, policy practice, nationally-oriented work, and international studies.  Authors considering publication in CASW should review the following editorial: Schelbe, L., & Thyer, B. A. (2019). Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal Editorial Policy: Guidelines for Authors. Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal, 36, 75-80.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书