Do AI stories align with the laws of the story economy?

IF 1.1 4区 文学 Q3 COMMUNICATION
Juha Raipola,Maria Mäkelä,Samuli Björninen,Laura Piippo
{"title":"Do AI stories align with the laws of the story economy?","authors":"Juha Raipola,Maria Mäkelä,Samuli Björninen,Laura Piippo","doi":"10.1075/ni.25163.rai","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The article situates LLM-generated narratives within the twenty-first-century story economy by asking how they rework the storytelling patterns shaped by social media, algorithmic optimization, and the pursuit of the “compelling story.” Previous research has shown that stories gaining traction on social media conform to the experiential narrative prototype outlined by sociolinguistics and cognitive narratology, and that this prototype overlaps with the universalist conceptions of narrative promoted by storytelling manuals and consultancy practices since the 1990s. We examine whether this prototype, which privileges personal transformation, survives in the training materials of LLMs and persists through alignment processes. We analyze 60 stories generated through minimal prompting using DeepSeek, ChatGPT, Copilot, and Grok. The results point towards the emergence of a new narrative prototype that invites us to reconsider narrative capital as it was understood in the Web 2.0 era with social media as its main narrative environment.","PeriodicalId":46671,"journal":{"name":"Narrative Inquiry","volume":"198 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Narrative Inquiry","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/ni.25163.rai","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract The article situates LLM-generated narratives within the twenty-first-century story economy by asking how they rework the storytelling patterns shaped by social media, algorithmic optimization, and the pursuit of the “compelling story.” Previous research has shown that stories gaining traction on social media conform to the experiential narrative prototype outlined by sociolinguistics and cognitive narratology, and that this prototype overlaps with the universalist conceptions of narrative promoted by storytelling manuals and consultancy practices since the 1990s. We examine whether this prototype, which privileges personal transformation, survives in the training materials of LLMs and persists through alignment processes. We analyze 60 stories generated through minimal prompting using DeepSeek, ChatGPT, Copilot, and Grok. The results point towards the emergence of a new narrative prototype that invites us to reconsider narrative capital as it was understood in the Web 2.0 era with social media as its main narrative environment.
AI故事是否符合故事经济规律?
本文将法学硕士生成的叙事置于21世纪的故事经济中,探讨它们如何重塑由社交媒体、算法优化和对“引人入胜的故事”的追求所塑造的叙事模式。先前的研究表明,在社交媒体上获得关注的故事符合社会语言学和认知叙事学概述的经验叙事原型,而这一原型与20世纪90年代以来讲故事手册和咨询实践所倡导的普遍主义叙事概念重叠。我们研究了这种特权个人转化的原型是否存在于法学硕士的培训材料中,并通过校准过程持续存在。我们分析了使用DeepSeek、ChatGPT、Copilot和Grok通过最小提示生成的60个故事。研究结果指向了一种新的叙事原型的出现,它邀请我们重新考虑在以社交媒体为主要叙事环境的Web 2.0时代所理解的叙事资本。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Narrative Inquiry
Narrative Inquiry Multiple-
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
14.30%
发文量
14
期刊介绍: Narrative Inquiry is devoted to providing a forum for theoretical, empirical, and methodological work on narrative. Articles appearing in Narrative Inquiry draw upon a variety of approaches and methodologies in the study of narrative as a way to give contour to experience, tradition, and values to next generations. Particular emphasis is placed on theoretical approaches to narrative and the analysis of narratives in human interaction, including those practiced by researchers in psychology, linguistics and related disciplines.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书