Generative Spaces: Collaboration, Learning and Innovation in a Regulatory Sandbox

IF 7.4 1区 管理学 Q1 POLITICAL SCIENCE
Carl Macrae,Christopher K Ansell
{"title":"Generative Spaces: Collaboration, Learning and Innovation in a Regulatory Sandbox","authors":"Carl Macrae,Christopher K Ansell","doi":"10.1093/jopart/muag024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Public administrators are increasingly called upon to create “generative spaces” that foster emergent processes of collaboration, learning and innovation. This article presents an inductive and ethnographically grounded study of one relatively novel but increasingly popular generative space—a regulatory sandbox. A regulatory sandbox is a controlled and defined space and set of processes that are established by regulators to work with innovators to collaboratively explore, test and learn about early-stage products and innovations and understand emerging regulatory implications. Investigating a sandbox to explore the regulation of new artificial intelligence technologies conducted by a national healthcare regulator, we identify the organizing practices of the sandbox that make it “generative” of collaboration, learning and innovation. An inductive analysis identified three key organizing practices: providing distinct and varied social spaces separated from normal regulatory demands (protection); enabling participants to collaboratively examine innovations and iteratively develop new knowledge and regulation (adaptation); and supporting focused and immersive examination of innovations from a diverse range of perspectives (participation). A theoretically-driven secondary analysis suggests that generative spaces can be understood as liminal experiences that foster detachment, equivalence and reconstruction.","PeriodicalId":48366,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory","volume":"26 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muag024","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Public administrators are increasingly called upon to create “generative spaces” that foster emergent processes of collaboration, learning and innovation. This article presents an inductive and ethnographically grounded study of one relatively novel but increasingly popular generative space—a regulatory sandbox. A regulatory sandbox is a controlled and defined space and set of processes that are established by regulators to work with innovators to collaboratively explore, test and learn about early-stage products and innovations and understand emerging regulatory implications. Investigating a sandbox to explore the regulation of new artificial intelligence technologies conducted by a national healthcare regulator, we identify the organizing practices of the sandbox that make it “generative” of collaboration, learning and innovation. An inductive analysis identified three key organizing practices: providing distinct and varied social spaces separated from normal regulatory demands (protection); enabling participants to collaboratively examine innovations and iteratively develop new knowledge and regulation (adaptation); and supporting focused and immersive examination of innovations from a diverse range of perspectives (participation). A theoretically-driven secondary analysis suggests that generative spaces can be understood as liminal experiences that foster detachment, equivalence and reconstruction.
生成空间:监管沙盒中的协作、学习和创新
公共管理者被越来越多地要求创建“生成空间”,以促进协作、学习和创新的新兴过程。本文介绍了一个相对新颖但日益流行的生成空间的归纳和民族志基础研究-监管沙盒。监管沙盒是由监管机构与创新者合作,共同探索、测试和了解早期产品和创新,并了解新出现的监管影响的受控和定义的空间和一套流程。通过对沙盒进行调查,探索国家医疗监管机构对新人工智能技术的监管,我们确定了沙盒的组织实践,使其成为协作、学习和创新的“生成”。归纳分析确定了三个关键的组织实践:提供与正常监管需求(保护)分离的独特而多样的社会空间;使参与者能够协作审查创新并迭代地开发新的知识和规则(适应);并支持从不同角度对创新进行集中和沉浸式的考察(参与)。一种理论驱动的二次分析表明,生成空间可以被理解为促进分离、对等和重建的阈限体验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
11.90%
发文量
46
期刊介绍: The Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory serves as a bridge between public administration or public management scholarship and public policy studies. The Journal aims to provide in-depth analysis of developments in the organizational, administrative, and policy sciences as they apply to government and governance. Each issue brings you critical perspectives and cogent analyses, serving as an outlet for the best theoretical and research work in the field. The Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory is the official journal of the Public Management Research Association.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书