Improved estimation of net ecosystem CO 2 exchange over North America using LSTM-based flux upscaling (2001–2021)

IF 13.6 1区 地球科学 Q1 GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Chengcheng Huang,Wei He,Brendan Byrne,Ngoc Tu Nguyen,Jingfeng Xiao,Hua Yang,Philippe Ciais,Songhan Wang,Xing Li,Han Ma,Peipei Xu,Mengyao Zhao,Hui Chen,Weimin Ju
{"title":"Improved estimation of net ecosystem CO\n 2\n exchange over North America using LSTM-based flux upscaling (2001–2021)","authors":"Chengcheng Huang,Wei He,Brendan Byrne,Ngoc Tu Nguyen,Jingfeng Xiao,Hua Yang,Philippe Ciais,Songhan Wang,Xing Li,Han Ma,Peipei Xu,Mengyao Zhao,Hui Chen,Weimin Ju","doi":"10.5194/essd-18-7367-2026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Accurate estimation of regional-scale terrestrial carbon budgets is of great importance but remains challenging. With particular advantages, the Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) network method shows potential for improving regional carbon budget upscaling estimations. Here, using LSTM, we upscaled regional net ecosystem carbon exchange (NEE) with available flux tower measurements and satellite land surface observations in North America. With well-established ecosystem-specific LSTMs, we produced monthly NEE at a spatial resolution of 0.1 ° ×0.1 ° over 2001–2021 (labelled as MemoryFlux). Unlike existing upscaling estimates, our dataset properly identified the Midwest Corn Belt as a region of large seasonal carbon uptake during the peak growing season, a feature revealed by previous top-down studies and recognized as a model benchmark. Moreover, the seasonal variations in NEE estimated by MemoryFlux were strongly correlated with those from independent atmospheric inversions, including the ensemble mean of the Orbiting Carbon Observatory-2 Model Intercomparison Project (OCO-2 v10 MIP; r =0.96, p <0.001) and CarbonTracker2022 (CT2022) ( r =0.97, p <0.001). The mean annual NEE was estimated at −1.27 ± 0.12 Pg C yr −1 , which was closer in magnitude to inversions (−0.83 to −0.70 Pg C yr −1 ) than existing upscaling estimates (−3.30 to −1.68 Pg C yr −1 ). In addition, MemoryFlux captured spatial NEE anomaly patterns associated with six selected severe drought and flood events. We further found that explicitly incorporating historical predictor information improved the representation of NEE interannual variability and spatial anomalies associated with climate extremes. MemoryFlux provides an improved bottom-up estimation of North American NEE and shows greater consistency in magnitude with independent atmospheric inversion estimates than several existing EC-based upscaling products. The MemoryFlux dataset is available at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20482274 (Huang and He, 2026).","PeriodicalId":48747,"journal":{"name":"Earth System Science Data","volume":"18 1","pages":"7367-7390"},"PeriodicalIF":13.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Earth System Science Data","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-18-7367-2026","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Accurate estimation of regional-scale terrestrial carbon budgets is of great importance but remains challenging. With particular advantages, the Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) network method shows potential for improving regional carbon budget upscaling estimations. Here, using LSTM, we upscaled regional net ecosystem carbon exchange (NEE) with available flux tower measurements and satellite land surface observations in North America. With well-established ecosystem-specific LSTMs, we produced monthly NEE at a spatial resolution of 0.1 ° ×0.1 ° over 2001–2021 (labelled as MemoryFlux). Unlike existing upscaling estimates, our dataset properly identified the Midwest Corn Belt as a region of large seasonal carbon uptake during the peak growing season, a feature revealed by previous top-down studies and recognized as a model benchmark. Moreover, the seasonal variations in NEE estimated by MemoryFlux were strongly correlated with those from independent atmospheric inversions, including the ensemble mean of the Orbiting Carbon Observatory-2 Model Intercomparison Project (OCO-2 v10 MIP; r =0.96, p <0.001) and CarbonTracker2022 (CT2022) ( r =0.97, p <0.001). The mean annual NEE was estimated at −1.27 ± 0.12 Pg C yr −1 , which was closer in magnitude to inversions (−0.83 to −0.70 Pg C yr −1 ) than existing upscaling estimates (−3.30 to −1.68 Pg C yr −1 ). In addition, MemoryFlux captured spatial NEE anomaly patterns associated with six selected severe drought and flood events. We further found that explicitly incorporating historical predictor information improved the representation of NEE interannual variability and spatial anomalies associated with climate extremes. MemoryFlux provides an improved bottom-up estimation of North American NEE and shows greater consistency in magnitude with independent atmospheric inversion estimates than several existing EC-based upscaling products. The MemoryFlux dataset is available at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20482274 (Huang and He, 2026).
基于lstm通量升级的北美生态系统CO 2净交换改进估算(2001-2021)
准确估计区域尺度的陆地碳收支非常重要,但仍然具有挑战性。长短期记忆(LSTM)网络方法具有一定的优势,在区域碳预算升级估算方面具有一定的潜力。利用LSTM方法,利用通量塔测量数据和卫星地表观测数据,对北美区域生态系统净碳交换(NEE)进行了升级。通过完善的生态系统特定lstm,我们在2001-2021年期间以0.1°×0.1°的空间分辨率每月生成NEE(标记为MemoryFlux)。与现有的升级估算不同,我们的数据集正确地将中西部玉米带确定为生长旺季大量季节性碳吸收的地区,这是之前自上而下的研究揭示的一个特征,并被公认为模型基准。此外,MemoryFlux估算的NEE的季节变化与独立大气逆温的季节变化具有很强的相关性,包括轨道碳观测-2模式比较项目(OCO-2 v10 MIP; r =0.96, p <0.001)和CarbonTracker2022 (CT2022) (r =0.97, p <0.001)的整体平均值。年平均NEE估计为- 1.27±0.12 Pg C /年- 1,与现有的升级估计(- 3.30至- 1.68 Pg C /年- 1)相比,其量级更接近于反转(- 0.83至- 0.70 Pg C /年- 1)。此外,MemoryFlux还捕获了与6个选定的严重旱涝事件相关的空间东北东电异常模式。我们进一步发现,明确纳入历史预测信息可以改善东北东线年际变率和与极端气候相关的空间异常的表征。MemoryFlux提供了一种改进的北美东北电自下而上的估计,与现有的几种基于ec的升级产品相比,它与独立的大气反演估计在量级上表现出更大的一致性。MemoryFlux数据集可在https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20482274获得(Huang and He, 2026)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Earth System Science Data
Earth System Science Data GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARYMETEOROLOGY-METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES
CiteScore
18.00
自引率
5.30%
发文量
231
审稿时长
35 weeks
期刊介绍: Earth System Science Data (ESSD) is an international, interdisciplinary journal that publishes articles on original research data in order to promote the reuse of high-quality data in the field of Earth system sciences. The journal welcomes submissions of original data or data collections that meet the required quality standards and have the potential to contribute to the goals of the journal. It includes sections dedicated to regular-length articles, brief communications (such as updates to existing data sets), commentaries, review articles, and special issues. ESSD is abstracted and indexed in several databases, including Science Citation Index Expanded, Current Contents/PCE, Scopus, ADS, CLOCKSS, CNKI, DOAJ, EBSCO, Gale/Cengage, GoOA (CAS), and Google Scholar, among others.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书