Large mammalian herbivores influence the deployment of microbial extracellular enzymes to control soil carbon cycling

IF 4.3 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Shamik Roy, Sumanta Bagchi
{"title":"Large mammalian herbivores influence the deployment of microbial extracellular enzymes to control soil carbon cycling","authors":"Shamik Roy,&nbsp;Sumanta Bagchi","doi":"10.1007/s10533-026-01378-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Large mammalian grazers have regulated biogeochemical cycles across 40% of the Earth’s terrestrial surface for millennia. While grazer effects on organic matter entering the soil are becoming clear, their effect on the downstream microbial foraging through extracellular-enzymes (EE), which link processes at the cellular level to ecosystem-level flow of matter remain less clear. We assessed how large mammalian grazers influence microbial foraging in soil using two lines of evidence. First, utilising a 14-year-old long-term grazer-exclusion experiment in the Trans-Himalayan ecosystem, we find that activities of seven enzymes peak at different months during the growing-season in an asynchronous manner. Microbial deployment of enzymes responded to grazer-exclusion by shifting from nitrogen (N)-acquisition in spring to carbon (C)- and phosphorus (P)-acquisition in summer and autumn. Grazer exclusion increased peroxidase activity by 124.7% and β-glucosidase by 16.7%. About half of the variation in enzyme portfolios was explained by seasonal differences in grazer effects. Grazer-exclusion increased the variability in the enzyme portfolio, requiring the microbes to forage across a larger portion of the functional space. Structural equation models suggested that grazer-exclusion worsens the quality of biomass input to soil due to an 18% increase in acid-unhydrolysable recalcitrant C. As seen in other ecosystems, this decline in substrate quality raises microbial deployment of generic depolymerizers relative to the specialized enzymes which release assimilable end-products. As greater investment in generic depolymerizing enzymes may reduce microbial carbon use efficiency, it can affect the C cycle. Second, laboratory incubations supported that soil enzymes are indeed inducible/repressible in response to experimental manipulation of biomass quality. Microbial responses appear predictable and generalisable across spatial scales, from laboratory-incubations to whole ecosystems. Hence, fostering microbial functions can enhance the scope and efficacy of rewilding and restoration for natural climate solutions.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8901,"journal":{"name":"Biogeochemistry","volume":"169 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10533-026-01378-0.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biogeochemistry","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10533-026-01378-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Large mammalian grazers have regulated biogeochemical cycles across 40% of the Earth’s terrestrial surface for millennia. While grazer effects on organic matter entering the soil are becoming clear, their effect on the downstream microbial foraging through extracellular-enzymes (EE), which link processes at the cellular level to ecosystem-level flow of matter remain less clear. We assessed how large mammalian grazers influence microbial foraging in soil using two lines of evidence. First, utilising a 14-year-old long-term grazer-exclusion experiment in the Trans-Himalayan ecosystem, we find that activities of seven enzymes peak at different months during the growing-season in an asynchronous manner. Microbial deployment of enzymes responded to grazer-exclusion by shifting from nitrogen (N)-acquisition in spring to carbon (C)- and phosphorus (P)-acquisition in summer and autumn. Grazer exclusion increased peroxidase activity by 124.7% and β-glucosidase by 16.7%. About half of the variation in enzyme portfolios was explained by seasonal differences in grazer effects. Grazer-exclusion increased the variability in the enzyme portfolio, requiring the microbes to forage across a larger portion of the functional space. Structural equation models suggested that grazer-exclusion worsens the quality of biomass input to soil due to an 18% increase in acid-unhydrolysable recalcitrant C. As seen in other ecosystems, this decline in substrate quality raises microbial deployment of generic depolymerizers relative to the specialized enzymes which release assimilable end-products. As greater investment in generic depolymerizing enzymes may reduce microbial carbon use efficiency, it can affect the C cycle. Second, laboratory incubations supported that soil enzymes are indeed inducible/repressible in response to experimental manipulation of biomass quality. Microbial responses appear predictable and generalisable across spatial scales, from laboratory-incubations to whole ecosystems. Hence, fostering microbial functions can enhance the scope and efficacy of rewilding and restoration for natural climate solutions.

大型食草哺乳动物影响微生物胞外酶的部署,以控制土壤碳循环
数千年来,大型食草哺乳动物调节着地球40%陆地表面的生物地球化学循环。虽然食草动物对进入土壤的有机质的影响越来越清楚,但它们对下游微生物通过细胞外酶(EE)觅食的影响仍然不太清楚,细胞外酶是将细胞水平的过程与生态系统水平的物质流动联系起来的。我们使用两种证据评估了大型哺乳动物食草动物如何影响土壤中微生物的觅食。首先,利用跨喜马拉雅生态系统14年的长期食草动物排斥实验,我们发现7种酶的活性在生长季节的不同月份达到峰值,并以异步方式呈现。微生物酶的部署通过从春季的氮(N)获取转向夏季和秋季的碳(C)和磷(P)获取来响应食草动物的排斥。排除放牧使过氧化物酶活性提高了124.7%,β-葡萄糖苷酶活性提高了16.7%。大约一半的酶组合变化可以用食草动物效应的季节差异来解释。排除食草动物增加了酶组合的可变性,要求微生物在更大的功能空间中觅食。结构方程模型表明,由于酸不可水解的顽固性c增加了18%,食草动物的排除使土壤生物量输入质量恶化。正如在其他生态系统中所见,这种底物质量的下降增加了微生物对通用解聚剂的部署,而不是释放可同化最终产物的专门酶。由于对通用解聚酶的大量投资可能会降低微生物对碳的利用效率,从而影响C循环。其次,实验室培养支持土壤酶在生物量质量的实验操作下确实是可诱导/可抑制的。从实验室孵育到整个生态系统,微生物反应在空间尺度上似乎是可预测和普遍的。因此,培养微生物的功能可以扩大野生和自然气候解决方案恢复的范围和效力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Biogeochemistry
Biogeochemistry 环境科学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
5.00%
发文量
112
审稿时长
3.2 months
期刊介绍: Biogeochemistry publishes original and synthetic papers dealing with biotic controls on the chemistry of the environment, or with the geochemical control of the structure and function of ecosystems. Cycles are considered, either of individual elements or of specific classes of natural or anthropogenic compounds in ecosystems. Particular emphasis is given to coupled interactions of element cycles. The journal spans from the molecular to global scales to elucidate the mechanisms driving patterns in biogeochemical cycles through space and time. Studies on both natural and artificial ecosystems are published when they contribute to a general understanding of biogeochemistry.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书