Validation of the Bone-RADS (Bone Reporting and Data System) Score for Predicting Risk of Malignancy

Alec Bigness,Guston Zervoudakis,Jon Raso,Conrad Stoy,Denise Kalos,David Joyce,G. Douglas Letson,Jamie Caracciolo,Alexander L. Lazarides,Odion Binitie
{"title":"Validation of the Bone-RADS (Bone Reporting and Data System) Score for Predicting Risk of Malignancy","authors":"Alec Bigness,Guston Zervoudakis,Jon Raso,Conrad Stoy,Denise Kalos,David Joyce,G. Douglas Letson,Jamie Caracciolo,Alexander L. Lazarides,Odion Binitie","doi":"10.2106/jbjs.26.00278","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Bone-RADS (Bone Reporting and Data System) is a consensus guideline by the American College of Radiology to assist in the risk stratification of lytic bone lesions. A score is calculated using 5 radiographic factors and a history of primary malignancy. The purpose of this study was to externally validate the Bone-RADS scoring system. Methods: This retrospective review examined radiographs from January 1, 2021, to December 31, 2021. Radiographs were identified via a keyword search for “lucent,” “osteolytic,” or “lytic” in extremity radiograph reports. All radiographs were initially read by a musculoskeletal radiologist. Radiographs of skeletally immature patients, lesions in a bone other than a long bone, primary soft-tissue masses, and negative/normal radiographs were excluded. Radiographs were independently scored on the basis of the Bone-RADS system by 4 reviewers. In the absence of a biopsy, a lesion was considered benign if it remained stable for 2 years on radiographs. Scores were correlated with final diagnoses to calculate the rates of malignancy and malignant transformation. Results: Of 1,108 screened radiographs, 423 were eligible. The mean age of the patients was 62 years and 49% were male. A higher Bone-RADS score was associated with a malignant diagnosis (p < 0.001), with an odds ratio of 9.7 (95% confidence interval [CI], 6.2 to 14.9) per 1-unit increase in the score. A higher margin score (p < 0.001), endosteal erosion (p < 0.001), a pathologic fracture (p < 0.001), and a soft-tissue mass (p = 0.02) were associated with increased risk of malignancy. The mean inter-rater agreement (weighted kappa) was 0.52, the inter-rater mean absolute deviation (MAD) was 0.37, and the intra-rater MAD was 0.27. Sensitivity was 97.1% (CI, 94.4% to 98.5%), specificity was 67.4% (CI, 59.3% to 74.5%), positive predictive value was 85.2% (CI, 80.9% to 88.7%), and negative predictive value was 92.4% (CI, 85.7% to 96.1%). Conclusions: The Bone-RADS scoring system demonstrated moderate diagnostic performance for malignancy risk stratification of lytic bone lesions, with high sensitivity and reproducible binary classification of possibly benign versus malignant. Although inter-rater agreement for the 4-tier score was only moderate, clinically relevant benign-versus-malignant categorization demonstrated higher inter- and intra-rater agreement. These findings support Bone-RADS as a practical triage framework based on musculoskeletal imaging of lytic bone lesions. Level of Evidence: Diagnostic Level III . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.","PeriodicalId":22625,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery","volume":"11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2106/jbjs.26.00278","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Bone-RADS (Bone Reporting and Data System) is a consensus guideline by the American College of Radiology to assist in the risk stratification of lytic bone lesions. A score is calculated using 5 radiographic factors and a history of primary malignancy. The purpose of this study was to externally validate the Bone-RADS scoring system. Methods: This retrospective review examined radiographs from January 1, 2021, to December 31, 2021. Radiographs were identified via a keyword search for “lucent,” “osteolytic,” or “lytic” in extremity radiograph reports. All radiographs were initially read by a musculoskeletal radiologist. Radiographs of skeletally immature patients, lesions in a bone other than a long bone, primary soft-tissue masses, and negative/normal radiographs were excluded. Radiographs were independently scored on the basis of the Bone-RADS system by 4 reviewers. In the absence of a biopsy, a lesion was considered benign if it remained stable for 2 years on radiographs. Scores were correlated with final diagnoses to calculate the rates of malignancy and malignant transformation. Results: Of 1,108 screened radiographs, 423 were eligible. The mean age of the patients was 62 years and 49% were male. A higher Bone-RADS score was associated with a malignant diagnosis (p < 0.001), with an odds ratio of 9.7 (95% confidence interval [CI], 6.2 to 14.9) per 1-unit increase in the score. A higher margin score (p < 0.001), endosteal erosion (p < 0.001), a pathologic fracture (p < 0.001), and a soft-tissue mass (p = 0.02) were associated with increased risk of malignancy. The mean inter-rater agreement (weighted kappa) was 0.52, the inter-rater mean absolute deviation (MAD) was 0.37, and the intra-rater MAD was 0.27. Sensitivity was 97.1% (CI, 94.4% to 98.5%), specificity was 67.4% (CI, 59.3% to 74.5%), positive predictive value was 85.2% (CI, 80.9% to 88.7%), and negative predictive value was 92.4% (CI, 85.7% to 96.1%). Conclusions: The Bone-RADS scoring system demonstrated moderate diagnostic performance for malignancy risk stratification of lytic bone lesions, with high sensitivity and reproducible binary classification of possibly benign versus malignant. Although inter-rater agreement for the 4-tier score was only moderate, clinically relevant benign-versus-malignant categorization demonstrated higher inter- and intra-rater agreement. These findings support Bone-RADS as a practical triage framework based on musculoskeletal imaging of lytic bone lesions. Level of Evidence: Diagnostic Level III . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
骨- rads(骨报告和数据系统)评分预测恶性肿瘤风险的验证
背景:骨报告和数据系统(Bone - rads)是美国放射学会的共识指南,用于协助对溶解性骨病变进行风险分层。用5个影像学因素和原发恶性肿瘤病史计算评分。本研究的目的是对Bone-RADS评分系统进行外部验证。方法:本回顾性研究检查了2021年1月1日至2021年12月31日的x线片。在四肢x线片报告中,通过关键词搜索“朗讯”、“溶骨”或“溶骨”来识别x线片。所有的x光片最初都由肌肉骨骼放射科医生阅读。骨骼不成熟患者的x线片、长骨以外的骨骼病变、原发性软组织肿块和阴性/正常x线片均被排除在外。x线片根据Bone-RADS系统由4位审查员独立评分。在没有活检的情况下,如果病变在x线片上保持稳定2年,则认为是良性病变。评分与最终诊断相关联,以计算恶性肿瘤和恶性转化的发生率。结果:在1108张筛查的x线片中,423张符合条件。患者平均年龄62岁,男性占49%。较高的Bone-RADS评分与恶性诊断相关(p < 0.001),评分每增加1个单位的优势比为9.7(95%可信区间[CI], 6.2至14.9)。较高的切缘评分(p < 0.001)、骨内侵蚀(p < 0.001)、病理性骨折(p < 0.001)和软组织肿块(p = 0.02)与恶性肿瘤的风险增加相关。评分者间平均一致性(加权kappa)为0.52,评分者间平均绝对偏差(MAD)为0.37,评分者间平均绝对偏差(MAD)为0.27。敏感性97.1% (CI, 94.4% ~ 98.5%),特异性67.4% (CI, 59.3% ~ 74.5%),阳性预测值85.2% (CI, 80.9% ~ 88.7%),阴性预测值92.4% (CI, 85.7% ~ 96.1%)。结论:bone - rads评分系统对溶解性骨病变的恶性风险分层具有中等诊断效能,具有高敏感性和可重复的良性与恶性二元分类。尽管4级评分的评分间一致性仅为中等,但临床相关的良性与恶性分类显示出更高的评分间和评分内一致性。这些发现支持bone - rads作为一种实用的分诊框架,基于溶解性骨病变的肌肉骨骼成像。证据等级:诊断级III。有关证据水平的完整描述,请参见作者说明。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书