Pan-European Training Program for Robotic Pancreatoduodenectomy (LEARNBOT)

IF 7.4 1区 医学 Q1 SURGERY
Leia R. Jones,Maurice J.W. Zwart,Felix Nickel,Thilo Hackert,Freek Daams,Bas Groot Koerkamp,Quintus Molenaar,Ugo Boggi,Olivier Saint Marc,Philip Leenart,Rawin Amiri,Mahsoem Ali,Sebastiaan Festen,Olivier Busch,Paul S. Krohn,Ernesto Sparrelid,Bergthor Björnsson,Christian Toso,Edoardo Rosso,Benjamin Strücker,Peter Strandberg-Holka,Maxime Dewulf,Maximilian Schmeding,Emre Bozkurt,Giovanni Ferrari,Steve White,Emanuel Vigia,Zahir Soonawalla,Martijn Stommel,Tim Worthington,Martin Lovecek,Declan Dunne,Giovanni Marchegiani,Filip Gryspeerdt,Melissa E. Hogg,Mohammad Abu Hilal,Marc G. Besselink,for the European Consortium on Minimally Invasive Pancreatic Surgery (E-MIPS)
{"title":"Pan-European Training Program for Robotic Pancreatoduodenectomy (LEARNBOT)","authors":"Leia R. Jones,Maurice J.W. Zwart,Felix Nickel,Thilo Hackert,Freek Daams,Bas Groot Koerkamp,Quintus Molenaar,Ugo Boggi,Olivier Saint Marc,Philip Leenart,Rawin Amiri,Mahsoem Ali,Sebastiaan Festen,Olivier Busch,Paul S. Krohn,Ernesto Sparrelid,Bergthor Björnsson,Christian Toso,Edoardo Rosso,Benjamin Strücker,Peter Strandberg-Holka,Maxime Dewulf,Maximilian Schmeding,Emre Bozkurt,Giovanni Ferrari,Steve White,Emanuel Vigia,Zahir Soonawalla,Martijn Stommel,Tim Worthington,Martin Lovecek,Declan Dunne,Giovanni Marchegiani,Filip Gryspeerdt,Melissa E. Hogg,Mohammad Abu Hilal,Marc G. Besselink,for the European Consortium on Minimally Invasive Pancreatic Surgery (E-MIPS)","doi":"10.1097/sla.0000000000007170","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To assess the feasibility of and clinical outcomes after a pan-European training program for robotic pancreatoduodenectomy (RPD). Summary Background Data: The implementation of RPD into clinical practice comes with considerable challenges, leading to concerns about patient safety, oncological outcomes, and costs. To address this, a structured training program was implemented in which 2 surgeons at each of the 20 sites were trained and maintained as a consistent operative team. Study Design: A structured training program for RPD was implemented, and outcomes prospectively collected in 20 European high-volume centers, all without previous RPD experience, from 12 countries. The program included a video library, biotissue simulation (pancreaticojejunostomy and hepaticojejunostomy), off-site RPD case observations, and on-site proctoring. Surgeons’ simulation anastomoses were assessed using Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills (OSATS) and technical errors. The primary endpoint was intra- and postoperative patient outcome. A key secondary analysis assessed safety using OSATS scores and error counts, and major correlated with conversion and postoperative outcomes. Results: Overall, 486 RPD procedures were performed. Median intraoperative blood loss was 200 mL (IQR: 100–400), operative time was 475 minutes (IQR: 414–553.3), and the conversion rate was 18.3% (n=89). The rate of Clavien-Dindo grade ≥III complications was 31.4% (n=153), POPF was 21.2% (n=103), delayed gastric emptying was 15% (n=73), postpancreatectomy hemorrhage was 8.6% (n=42), and in-hospital/30-day mortality was 2.7% (n=13). Median length of stay was 12 days (IQR: 8–20). During simulation training, OSATS scores significantly improved (0.350 points/attempt ( ρ ), P <0.001) while the duration of reconstruction decreased ( P <0.001). Multivariable analysis found no association between error count and major complications. Conclusions: We report on the first successfully completed international training program for RPD. Simulation established a standardized technical competency, although a learning-curve effect (major complications) remained detectable per center. These data highlight that safe adoption of complex procedures requires structured, team-based, proctored training beyond simulation alone.","PeriodicalId":8017,"journal":{"name":"Annals of surgery","volume":"41 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/sla.0000000000007170","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To assess the feasibility of and clinical outcomes after a pan-European training program for robotic pancreatoduodenectomy (RPD). Summary Background Data: The implementation of RPD into clinical practice comes with considerable challenges, leading to concerns about patient safety, oncological outcomes, and costs. To address this, a structured training program was implemented in which 2 surgeons at each of the 20 sites were trained and maintained as a consistent operative team. Study Design: A structured training program for RPD was implemented, and outcomes prospectively collected in 20 European high-volume centers, all without previous RPD experience, from 12 countries. The program included a video library, biotissue simulation (pancreaticojejunostomy and hepaticojejunostomy), off-site RPD case observations, and on-site proctoring. Surgeons’ simulation anastomoses were assessed using Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills (OSATS) and technical errors. The primary endpoint was intra- and postoperative patient outcome. A key secondary analysis assessed safety using OSATS scores and error counts, and major correlated with conversion and postoperative outcomes. Results: Overall, 486 RPD procedures were performed. Median intraoperative blood loss was 200 mL (IQR: 100–400), operative time was 475 minutes (IQR: 414–553.3), and the conversion rate was 18.3% (n=89). The rate of Clavien-Dindo grade ≥III complications was 31.4% (n=153), POPF was 21.2% (n=103), delayed gastric emptying was 15% (n=73), postpancreatectomy hemorrhage was 8.6% (n=42), and in-hospital/30-day mortality was 2.7% (n=13). Median length of stay was 12 days (IQR: 8–20). During simulation training, OSATS scores significantly improved (0.350 points/attempt ( ρ ), P <0.001) while the duration of reconstruction decreased ( P <0.001). Multivariable analysis found no association between error count and major complications. Conclusions: We report on the first successfully completed international training program for RPD. Simulation established a standardized technical competency, although a learning-curve effect (major complications) remained detectable per center. These data highlight that safe adoption of complex procedures requires structured, team-based, proctored training beyond simulation alone.
泛欧机器人胰十二指肠切除术培训计划(LEARNBOT)
目的:评估机器人胰十二指肠切除术(RPD)泛欧培训项目的可行性和临床结果。背景资料:RPD在临床实践中的实施面临着相当大的挑战,导致对患者安全、肿瘤预后和成本的担忧。为了解决这个问题,我们实施了一个结构化的培训计划,在20个地点,每个地点都有2名外科医生接受培训,并保持一致的手术团队。研究设计:实施了RPD的结构化培训计划,并前瞻性地收集了来自12个国家的20个欧洲高容量中心的结果,这些中心以前都没有RPD经验。该项目包括视频库、生物组织模拟(胰空肠吻合术和肝空肠吻合术)、非现场RPD病例观察和现场监护。采用客观结构化技术技能评估(OSATS)和技术错误对外科医生的模拟吻合进行评估。主要终点是患者的手术中和术后预后。关键的二次分析使用OSATS评分和错误计数评估安全性,主要与转换和术后结果相关。结果:总共进行了486例RPD手术。术中出血量中位数200 mL (IQR: 100-400),手术时间475 min (IQR: 414-553.3),转化率为18.3% (n=89)。Clavien-Dindo≥III级并发症发生率为31.4% (n=153), POPF发生率为21.2% (n=103),胃排空延迟发生率为15% (n=73),胰腺切除术后出血发生率为8.6% (n=42),住院/30天死亡率为2.7% (n=13)。中位住院时间为12天(IQR: 8-20)。在模拟训练期间,OSATS得分显著提高(0.350分/次,P <0.001),重建时间缩短(P <0.001)。多变量分析发现错误计数与主要并发症之间无关联。结论:我们报告了第一个成功完成的RPD国际培训项目。模拟建立了标准化的技术能力,尽管学习曲线效应(主要并发症)仍然可以在每个中心检测到。这些数据强调,安全采用复杂的程序需要结构化的、基于团队的、有监督的培训,而不仅仅是模拟。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annals of surgery
Annals of surgery 医学-外科
CiteScore
14.40
自引率
4.40%
发文量
687
审稿时长
4 months
期刊介绍: The Annals of Surgery is a renowned surgery journal, recognized globally for its extensive scholarly references. It serves as a valuable resource for the international medical community by disseminating knowledge regarding important developments in surgical science and practice. Surgeons regularly turn to the Annals of Surgery to stay updated on innovative practices and techniques. The journal also offers special editorial features such as "Advances in Surgical Technique," offering timely coverage of ongoing clinical issues. Additionally, the journal publishes monthly review articles that address the latest concerns in surgical practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书