Leia R. Jones,Maurice J.W. Zwart,Felix Nickel,Thilo Hackert,Freek Daams,Bas Groot Koerkamp,Quintus Molenaar,Ugo Boggi,Olivier Saint Marc,Philip Leenart,Rawin Amiri,Mahsoem Ali,Sebastiaan Festen,Olivier Busch,Paul S. Krohn,Ernesto Sparrelid,Bergthor Björnsson,Christian Toso,Edoardo Rosso,Benjamin Strücker,Peter Strandberg-Holka,Maxime Dewulf,Maximilian Schmeding,Emre Bozkurt,Giovanni Ferrari,Steve White,Emanuel Vigia,Zahir Soonawalla,Martijn Stommel,Tim Worthington,Martin Lovecek,Declan Dunne,Giovanni Marchegiani,Filip Gryspeerdt,Melissa E. Hogg,Mohammad Abu Hilal,Marc G. Besselink,for the European Consortium on Minimally Invasive Pancreatic Surgery (E-MIPS)
{"title":"Pan-European Training Program for Robotic Pancreatoduodenectomy (LEARNBOT)","authors":"Leia R. Jones,Maurice J.W. Zwart,Felix Nickel,Thilo Hackert,Freek Daams,Bas Groot Koerkamp,Quintus Molenaar,Ugo Boggi,Olivier Saint Marc,Philip Leenart,Rawin Amiri,Mahsoem Ali,Sebastiaan Festen,Olivier Busch,Paul S. Krohn,Ernesto Sparrelid,Bergthor Björnsson,Christian Toso,Edoardo Rosso,Benjamin Strücker,Peter Strandberg-Holka,Maxime Dewulf,Maximilian Schmeding,Emre Bozkurt,Giovanni Ferrari,Steve White,Emanuel Vigia,Zahir Soonawalla,Martijn Stommel,Tim Worthington,Martin Lovecek,Declan Dunne,Giovanni Marchegiani,Filip Gryspeerdt,Melissa E. Hogg,Mohammad Abu Hilal,Marc G. Besselink,for the European Consortium on Minimally Invasive Pancreatic Surgery (E-MIPS)","doi":"10.1097/sla.0000000000007170","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To assess the feasibility of and clinical outcomes after a pan-European training program for robotic pancreatoduodenectomy (RPD). Summary Background Data: The implementation of RPD into clinical practice comes with considerable challenges, leading to concerns about patient safety, oncological outcomes, and costs. To address this, a structured training program was implemented in which 2 surgeons at each of the 20 sites were trained and maintained as a consistent operative team. Study Design: A structured training program for RPD was implemented, and outcomes prospectively collected in 20 European high-volume centers, all without previous RPD experience, from 12 countries. The program included a video library, biotissue simulation (pancreaticojejunostomy and hepaticojejunostomy), off-site RPD case observations, and on-site proctoring. Surgeons’ simulation anastomoses were assessed using Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills (OSATS) and technical errors. The primary endpoint was intra- and postoperative patient outcome. A key secondary analysis assessed safety using OSATS scores and error counts, and major correlated with conversion and postoperative outcomes. Results: Overall, 486 RPD procedures were performed. Median intraoperative blood loss was 200 mL (IQR: 100–400), operative time was 475 minutes (IQR: 414–553.3), and the conversion rate was 18.3% (n=89). The rate of Clavien-Dindo grade ≥III complications was 31.4% (n=153), POPF was 21.2% (n=103), delayed gastric emptying was 15% (n=73), postpancreatectomy hemorrhage was 8.6% (n=42), and in-hospital/30-day mortality was 2.7% (n=13). Median length of stay was 12 days (IQR: 8–20). During simulation training, OSATS scores significantly improved (0.350 points/attempt ( ρ ), P <0.001) while the duration of reconstruction decreased ( P <0.001). Multivariable analysis found no association between error count and major complications. Conclusions: We report on the first successfully completed international training program for RPD. Simulation established a standardized technical competency, although a learning-curve effect (major complications) remained detectable per center. These data highlight that safe adoption of complex procedures requires structured, team-based, proctored training beyond simulation alone.","PeriodicalId":8017,"journal":{"name":"Annals of surgery","volume":"41 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/sla.0000000000007170","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: To assess the feasibility of and clinical outcomes after a pan-European training program for robotic pancreatoduodenectomy (RPD). Summary Background Data: The implementation of RPD into clinical practice comes with considerable challenges, leading to concerns about patient safety, oncological outcomes, and costs. To address this, a structured training program was implemented in which 2 surgeons at each of the 20 sites were trained and maintained as a consistent operative team. Study Design: A structured training program for RPD was implemented, and outcomes prospectively collected in 20 European high-volume centers, all without previous RPD experience, from 12 countries. The program included a video library, biotissue simulation (pancreaticojejunostomy and hepaticojejunostomy), off-site RPD case observations, and on-site proctoring. Surgeons’ simulation anastomoses were assessed using Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills (OSATS) and technical errors. The primary endpoint was intra- and postoperative patient outcome. A key secondary analysis assessed safety using OSATS scores and error counts, and major correlated with conversion and postoperative outcomes. Results: Overall, 486 RPD procedures were performed. Median intraoperative blood loss was 200 mL (IQR: 100–400), operative time was 475 minutes (IQR: 414–553.3), and the conversion rate was 18.3% (n=89). The rate of Clavien-Dindo grade ≥III complications was 31.4% (n=153), POPF was 21.2% (n=103), delayed gastric emptying was 15% (n=73), postpancreatectomy hemorrhage was 8.6% (n=42), and in-hospital/30-day mortality was 2.7% (n=13). Median length of stay was 12 days (IQR: 8–20). During simulation training, OSATS scores significantly improved (0.350 points/attempt ( ρ ), P <0.001) while the duration of reconstruction decreased ( P <0.001). Multivariable analysis found no association between error count and major complications. Conclusions: We report on the first successfully completed international training program for RPD. Simulation established a standardized technical competency, although a learning-curve effect (major complications) remained detectable per center. These data highlight that safe adoption of complex procedures requires structured, team-based, proctored training beyond simulation alone.
期刊介绍:
The Annals of Surgery is a renowned surgery journal, recognized globally for its extensive scholarly references. It serves as a valuable resource for the international medical community by disseminating knowledge regarding important developments in surgical science and practice. Surgeons regularly turn to the Annals of Surgery to stay updated on innovative practices and techniques. The journal also offers special editorial features such as "Advances in Surgical Technique," offering timely coverage of ongoing clinical issues. Additionally, the journal publishes monthly review articles that address the latest concerns in surgical practice.