Quality optimization with low positive factual hallucination for the HPI in hyperthyroidism admission notes using multi agent LLM with RAG

IF 18 1区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Qingya Zeng, Huiyu Lan, Hang Lv, Jing Lin, Pengxiang Zhan, Binteng Cai, Yacong Yang, Ji Huang, Lan Lin, Yan Chen, Xiongfeng Chen, Wei Lin, Yanchao Tan, Gang Chen
{"title":"Quality optimization with low positive factual hallucination for the HPI in hyperthyroidism admission notes using multi agent LLM with RAG","authors":"Qingya Zeng, Huiyu Lan, Hang Lv, Jing Lin, Pengxiang Zhan, Binteng Cai, Yacong Yang, Ji Huang, Lan Lin, Yan Chen, Xiongfeng Chen, Wei Lin, Yanchao Tan, Gang Chen","doi":"10.1038/s41746-026-03321-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Admission note quality affects clinical safety and research reliability, yet resident drafts often suffer from missing information, unclear logic, and other issues, requiring time-consuming manual review. Current large language models (LLMs) focus on text generation or formatting correction but rarely optimize clinical logic or mitigate hallucinations in specialized notes. We developed HQ-ANR (High-Quality Admission Note Refinement), a hyperthyroidism-specific quality-control model that integrates multi-agent collaboration with diagnosis-driven retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) to optimize the history of present illness (HPI) in admission notes. Built on a general-purpose LLM (Qwen3-32B), HQ-ANR anchors generation to a dual-source knowledge base (guidelines and expert notes) and employs specialized agents for symptoms, examinations, and treatments. In a blinded evaluation of 30 resident-drafted hyperthyroidism notes, HQ-ANR significantly improved median Physician Documentation Quality Instrument (PDQI-9) scores (from 39.00 to 42.00) and reduced the hallucination rate (positive factual hallucinations only) to 6.67%, compared to 26.67% for a general LLM with chain-of-thought (CoT) prompting. Efficiency analysis showed HQ-ANR reduced physician refinement time by an average of 112.9 s per note (p < 0.001). These results demonstrate that augmenting a general LLM with external knowledge and a multi-agent framework can achieve reliable, in-depth optimization of clinical notes without expensive vertical training, offering a practical pathway toward intelligent, safe documentation quality control and reducing physician documentation burden.","PeriodicalId":19349,"journal":{"name":"NPJ Digital Medicine","volume":"18 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":18.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NPJ Digital Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-026-03321-x","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Admission note quality affects clinical safety and research reliability, yet resident drafts often suffer from missing information, unclear logic, and other issues, requiring time-consuming manual review. Current large language models (LLMs) focus on text generation or formatting correction but rarely optimize clinical logic or mitigate hallucinations in specialized notes. We developed HQ-ANR (High-Quality Admission Note Refinement), a hyperthyroidism-specific quality-control model that integrates multi-agent collaboration with diagnosis-driven retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) to optimize the history of present illness (HPI) in admission notes. Built on a general-purpose LLM (Qwen3-32B), HQ-ANR anchors generation to a dual-source knowledge base (guidelines and expert notes) and employs specialized agents for symptoms, examinations, and treatments. In a blinded evaluation of 30 resident-drafted hyperthyroidism notes, HQ-ANR significantly improved median Physician Documentation Quality Instrument (PDQI-9) scores (from 39.00 to 42.00) and reduced the hallucination rate (positive factual hallucinations only) to 6.67%, compared to 26.67% for a general LLM with chain-of-thought (CoT) prompting. Efficiency analysis showed HQ-ANR reduced physician refinement time by an average of 112.9 s per note (p < 0.001). These results demonstrate that augmenting a general LLM with external knowledge and a multi-agent framework can achieve reliable, in-depth optimization of clinical notes without expensive vertical training, offering a practical pathway toward intelligent, safe documentation quality control and reducing physician documentation burden.
多药LLM联合RAG对甲亢入院记录中HPI的质量优化及低阳性幻觉
住院医师草稿的质量影响临床安全性和研究可靠性,但住院医师草稿往往存在信息缺失、逻辑不清等问题,需要耗费大量时间进行人工审核。目前的大型语言模型(llm)专注于文本生成或格式校正,但很少优化临床逻辑或减轻专业笔记中的幻觉。我们开发了HQ-ANR(高质量入院记录改进),这是一种针对甲状腺功能亢进的质量控制模型,将多智能体协作与诊断驱动的检索增强生成(RAG)相结合,以优化入院记录中的病史(HPI)。基于通用LLM (Qwen3-32B), HQ-ANR将生成锚定到双源知识库(指南和专家注释),并使用专门的代理进行症状、检查和治疗。在一项对30名住院医生起草的甲亢病历的盲法评估中,HQ-ANR显著提高了医师文献质量工具(PDQI-9)评分的中位数(从39.00到42.00),并将幻觉率(仅为阳性事实幻觉)降低至6.67%,而思维链(CoT)提示的普通LLM为26.67%。效率分析显示,HQ-ANR使医生改进时间平均减少112.9 s (p < 0.001)。这些结果表明,利用外部知识和多智能体框架增强一般LLM可以在不需要昂贵的垂直培训的情况下实现可靠、深入的临床笔记优化,为智能、安全的文档质量控制和减少医生文档负担提供了切实可行的途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
25.10
自引率
3.30%
发文量
170
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: npj Digital Medicine is an online open-access journal that focuses on publishing peer-reviewed research in the field of digital medicine. The journal covers various aspects of digital medicine, including the application and implementation of digital and mobile technologies in clinical settings, virtual healthcare, and the use of artificial intelligence and informatics. The primary goal of the journal is to support innovation and the advancement of healthcare through the integration of new digital and mobile technologies. When determining if a manuscript is suitable for publication, the journal considers four important criteria: novelty, clinical relevance, scientific rigor, and digital innovation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书