Bridging therapy response and type as determinants of cilta-cel outcomes in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma

IF 13.8 1区 医学 Q1 HEMATOLOGY
Doris K. Hansen, Brett M. Reid, Ariel Grajales-Cruz, Peter Cheng, Zhuoer Xie, Brandon Blue, Dae Hyun Lee, Laura Oswald, Gabriel De Avila, David Scheiber-Camoretti, Ken Harada, Daniel De Avila, Brandon Kale, Karla Feliciano Salva, David Kaldas, Kristy Matte, Todd Stinard, Rebecca Gonzalez, Victoria Alegria, Matthew Perciavalle, Helen Pai, Mukta Sharma, Kevin C. De Braganca, Zaina P. Qureshi, Fabiana Perna, Hien Liu, Kenneth H. Shain, Rachid Baz, Taiga Nishihori, Melissa Alsina, Ciara L. Freeman, Omar Alexis Castaneda Puglianini, Frederick L. Locke, Lauren C. Peres
{"title":"Bridging therapy response and type as determinants of cilta-cel outcomes in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma","authors":"Doris K. Hansen, Brett M. Reid, Ariel Grajales-Cruz, Peter Cheng, Zhuoer Xie, Brandon Blue, Dae Hyun Lee, Laura Oswald, Gabriel De Avila, David Scheiber-Camoretti, Ken Harada, Daniel De Avila, Brandon Kale, Karla Feliciano Salva, David Kaldas, Kristy Matte, Todd Stinard, Rebecca Gonzalez, Victoria Alegria, Matthew Perciavalle, Helen Pai, Mukta Sharma, Kevin C. De Braganca, Zaina P. Qureshi, Fabiana Perna, Hien Liu, Kenneth H. Shain, Rachid Baz, Taiga Nishihori, Melissa Alsina, Ciara L. Freeman, Omar Alexis Castaneda Puglianini, Frederick L. Locke, Lauren C. Peres","doi":"10.1038/s41408-026-01633-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Ciltacabtagene autoleucel (cilta-cel) has demonstrated remarkable efficacy in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). Bridging therapy (BT) is commonly used to mitigate progression pre-lymphodepletion (LD) and enhance safety and efficacy. However, real-world evidence characterizing BT strategies and outcomes is limited. This retrospective study included patients with RRMM who received commercial cilta-cel (May 2022–January 2025). Biochemical response to BT as well as post-infusion outcomes including cilta-cel response, progression-free survival (PFS), and safety were assessed. Among 192 patients receiving cilta-cel, 172 (90%) received BT. Of 115 patients with evaluable biochemical response to BT, 54% achieved decreased disease, with response highest among talquetamab and proteasome inhibitor-based regimens. Safety was consistent with the known cilta-cel profile. Reduction in disease burden during BT was associated with lower rates of grade ≥ 3 ICANS, while alkylator-based BT had higher rates of grade ≥ 3 cytopenias. Overall response rate to cilta-cel was 92% (69% with at least complete response), with numerically higher rates among those with decreased disease during BT. Median PFS was not reached among patients with decreased disease during BT versus 16.2 months among those with stable/increased disease (p = 0.03). Findings suggest that biochemical response to BT may enhance the benefit-risk profile of cilta-cel in clinical practice.","PeriodicalId":8989,"journal":{"name":"Blood Cancer Journal","volume":"4 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":13.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Blood Cancer Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41408-026-01633-5","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Ciltacabtagene autoleucel (cilta-cel) has demonstrated remarkable efficacy in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). Bridging therapy (BT) is commonly used to mitigate progression pre-lymphodepletion (LD) and enhance safety and efficacy. However, real-world evidence characterizing BT strategies and outcomes is limited. This retrospective study included patients with RRMM who received commercial cilta-cel (May 2022–January 2025). Biochemical response to BT as well as post-infusion outcomes including cilta-cel response, progression-free survival (PFS), and safety were assessed. Among 192 patients receiving cilta-cel, 172 (90%) received BT. Of 115 patients with evaluable biochemical response to BT, 54% achieved decreased disease, with response highest among talquetamab and proteasome inhibitor-based regimens. Safety was consistent with the known cilta-cel profile. Reduction in disease burden during BT was associated with lower rates of grade ≥ 3 ICANS, while alkylator-based BT had higher rates of grade ≥ 3 cytopenias. Overall response rate to cilta-cel was 92% (69% with at least complete response), with numerically higher rates among those with decreased disease during BT. Median PFS was not reached among patients with decreased disease during BT versus 16.2 months among those with stable/increased disease (p = 0.03). Findings suggest that biochemical response to BT may enhance the benefit-risk profile of cilta-cel in clinical practice.

Abstract Image

桥接治疗反应和类型是复发/难治性多发性骨髓瘤cilta- cell预后的决定因素
cilta-cel治疗复发/难治性多发性骨髓瘤(RRMM)疗效显著。桥接治疗(BT)通常用于缓解进展性淋巴细胞耗损(LD),提高安全性和有效性。然而,表征BT策略和结果的真实证据是有限的。这项回顾性研究纳入了接受商品化cilta- cell治疗的RRMM患者(2022年5月至2025年1月)。评估对BT的生化反应以及输注后的结果,包括cilta细胞反应、无进展生存期(PFS)和安全性。在接受cilta- cell治疗的192例患者中,172例(90%)接受了BT治疗。在115例对BT有可评估的生化反应的患者中,54%的患者病情减轻,其中以talquetamab和蛋白酶体抑制剂为基础的方案的疗效最高。安全性与已知的cilta- cell特征一致。BT期间疾病负担的减轻与≥3级ICANS发生率较低相关,而基于烷基化剂的BT具有≥3级细胞减少率较高。cilta-cel的总缓解率为92%(69%至少完全缓解),在BT期间病情减轻的患者中,这一数字更高。BT期间病情减轻的患者未达到中位PFS,而病情稳定/加重的患者为16.2个月(p = 0.03)。研究结果表明,在临床实践中,对BT的生化反应可能会提高cilta- cell的获益-风险概况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
16.70
自引率
2.30%
发文量
153
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Blood Cancer Journal is dedicated to publishing high-quality articles related to hematologic malignancies and related disorders. The journal welcomes submissions of original research, reviews, guidelines, and letters that are deemed to have a significant impact in the field. While the journal covers a wide range of topics, it particularly focuses on areas such as: Preclinical studies of new compounds, especially those that provide mechanistic insights Clinical trials and observations Reviews related to new drugs and current management of hematologic malignancies Novel observations related to new mutations, molecular pathways, and tumor genomics Blood Cancer Journal offers a forum for expedited publication of novel observations regarding new mutations or altered pathways.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书