AI-assisted telerehabilitation in early Parkinson’s disease: a multicenter, randomized, multi-arm comparative trial

IF 18 1区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Huimin Chen, Huijing Liu, Yueying Liu, Miaoxian Xie, Wenyi Kou, Xinxin Ma, Yunfei Long, Dongdong Wu, Wei Du, Jing He, Shuhua Li, Haibo Chen, Xue Bai, Kezhong Zhang, Jianping Huang, Yi Wang, Wen Su
{"title":"AI-assisted telerehabilitation in early Parkinson’s disease: a multicenter, randomized, multi-arm comparative trial","authors":"Huimin Chen, Huijing Liu, Yueying Liu, Miaoxian Xie, Wenyi Kou, Xinxin Ma, Yunfei Long, Dongdong Wu, Wei Du, Jing He, Shuhua Li, Haibo Chen, Xue Bai, Kezhong Zhang, Jianping Huang, Yi Wang, Wen Su","doi":"10.1038/s41746-026-03339-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This exploratory, multicenter, randomized, rater-blinded, multi-arm comparative trial aimed to evaluate the feasibility and exploratory clinical signals of an AI-facilitated telerehabilitation system across different intervention durations in early-stage Parkinson’s disease (PD). One-hundred and twenty PD patients (Hoehn-Yahr stage ≤2.5) were randomized in a 1:1:1 ratio into short-term (1 month), medium-term (2 months), and long-term (3 months) training groups (15–30 min, 5 days/week). The primary outcome was the change in MDS-UPDRS Part III score from baseline to 3 months. Secondary outcomes included change in cognition, mood, gait parameters, activity of daily living, and safety. Final analysis included 71 participants. No significant differences were observed between groups for the primary motor outcome at 3 months. Post hoc responder analysis showed that the 3-month group had higher proportions reaching the exploratory cognitive responder threshold compared with the 1-month group. Exploratory correlations between MoCA changes and motor parameter changes were weak and did not remain statistically significant after false discovery rate correction. No falls or adverse events were recorded throughout the trial. Because the primary endpoint was negative, attrition was high, no usual-care control was included, and the cognitive finding was limited to an exploratory post-hoc responder analysis, these findings do not permit causal inference and should be interpreted as hypothesis-generating, requiring further validation in larger, prespecified multi-arm comparative trials (Chinese Clinical Trial Registry Number: ChiCTR2500108323).","PeriodicalId":19349,"journal":{"name":"NPJ Digital Medicine","volume":"24 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":18.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NPJ Digital Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-026-03339-1","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This exploratory, multicenter, randomized, rater-blinded, multi-arm comparative trial aimed to evaluate the feasibility and exploratory clinical signals of an AI-facilitated telerehabilitation system across different intervention durations in early-stage Parkinson’s disease (PD). One-hundred and twenty PD patients (Hoehn-Yahr stage ≤2.5) were randomized in a 1:1:1 ratio into short-term (1 month), medium-term (2 months), and long-term (3 months) training groups (15–30 min, 5 days/week). The primary outcome was the change in MDS-UPDRS Part III score from baseline to 3 months. Secondary outcomes included change in cognition, mood, gait parameters, activity of daily living, and safety. Final analysis included 71 participants. No significant differences were observed between groups for the primary motor outcome at 3 months. Post hoc responder analysis showed that the 3-month group had higher proportions reaching the exploratory cognitive responder threshold compared with the 1-month group. Exploratory correlations between MoCA changes and motor parameter changes were weak and did not remain statistically significant after false discovery rate correction. No falls or adverse events were recorded throughout the trial. Because the primary endpoint was negative, attrition was high, no usual-care control was included, and the cognitive finding was limited to an exploratory post-hoc responder analysis, these findings do not permit causal inference and should be interpreted as hypothesis-generating, requiring further validation in larger, prespecified multi-arm comparative trials (Chinese Clinical Trial Registry Number: ChiCTR2500108323).
人工智能辅助远程康复治疗早期帕金森病:一项多中心、随机、多组比较试验
这项探索性、多中心、随机、非盲、多组比较试验旨在评估人工智能促进的远程康复系统在早期帕金森病(PD)不同干预时间的可行性和探索性临床信号。120例PD患者(Hoehn-Yahr期≤2.5)按1:1:1的比例随机分为短期(1个月)、中期(2个月)和长期(3个月)训练组(15-30分钟,5天/周)。主要结局是MDS-UPDRS第三部分评分从基线到3个月的变化。次要结果包括认知、情绪、步态参数、日常生活活动和安全性的变化。最终的分析包括71名参与者。3个月时各组间的主要运动预后无显著差异。事后反应分析显示,与1个月组相比,3个月组达到探索性认知反应阈值的比例更高。MoCA变化与运动参数变化之间的探索性相关性较弱,并且在错误发现率校正后没有统计学意义。在整个试验过程中没有记录跌倒或不良事件。由于主要终点为阴性,损耗率高,不包括常规护理对照,认知发现仅限于探索性事后反应分析,这些发现不允许因果推理,应被解释为假设生成,需要在更大的、预先指定的多组比较试验中进一步验证(中国临床试验注册号:ChiCTR2500108323)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
25.10
自引率
3.30%
发文量
170
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: npj Digital Medicine is an online open-access journal that focuses on publishing peer-reviewed research in the field of digital medicine. The journal covers various aspects of digital medicine, including the application and implementation of digital and mobile technologies in clinical settings, virtual healthcare, and the use of artificial intelligence and informatics. The primary goal of the journal is to support innovation and the advancement of healthcare through the integration of new digital and mobile technologies. When determining if a manuscript is suitable for publication, the journal considers four important criteria: novelty, clinical relevance, scientific rigor, and digital innovation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书