{"title":"AI-assisted telerehabilitation in early Parkinson’s disease: a multicenter, randomized, multi-arm comparative trial","authors":"Huimin Chen, Huijing Liu, Yueying Liu, Miaoxian Xie, Wenyi Kou, Xinxin Ma, Yunfei Long, Dongdong Wu, Wei Du, Jing He, Shuhua Li, Haibo Chen, Xue Bai, Kezhong Zhang, Jianping Huang, Yi Wang, Wen Su","doi":"10.1038/s41746-026-03339-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This exploratory, multicenter, randomized, rater-blinded, multi-arm comparative trial aimed to evaluate the feasibility and exploratory clinical signals of an AI-facilitated telerehabilitation system across different intervention durations in early-stage Parkinson’s disease (PD). One-hundred and twenty PD patients (Hoehn-Yahr stage ≤2.5) were randomized in a 1:1:1 ratio into short-term (1 month), medium-term (2 months), and long-term (3 months) training groups (15–30 min, 5 days/week). The primary outcome was the change in MDS-UPDRS Part III score from baseline to 3 months. Secondary outcomes included change in cognition, mood, gait parameters, activity of daily living, and safety. Final analysis included 71 participants. No significant differences were observed between groups for the primary motor outcome at 3 months. Post hoc responder analysis showed that the 3-month group had higher proportions reaching the exploratory cognitive responder threshold compared with the 1-month group. Exploratory correlations between MoCA changes and motor parameter changes were weak and did not remain statistically significant after false discovery rate correction. No falls or adverse events were recorded throughout the trial. Because the primary endpoint was negative, attrition was high, no usual-care control was included, and the cognitive finding was limited to an exploratory post-hoc responder analysis, these findings do not permit causal inference and should be interpreted as hypothesis-generating, requiring further validation in larger, prespecified multi-arm comparative trials (Chinese Clinical Trial Registry Number: ChiCTR2500108323).","PeriodicalId":19349,"journal":{"name":"NPJ Digital Medicine","volume":"24 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":18.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NPJ Digital Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-026-03339-1","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This exploratory, multicenter, randomized, rater-blinded, multi-arm comparative trial aimed to evaluate the feasibility and exploratory clinical signals of an AI-facilitated telerehabilitation system across different intervention durations in early-stage Parkinson’s disease (PD). One-hundred and twenty PD patients (Hoehn-Yahr stage ≤2.5) were randomized in a 1:1:1 ratio into short-term (1 month), medium-term (2 months), and long-term (3 months) training groups (15–30 min, 5 days/week). The primary outcome was the change in MDS-UPDRS Part III score from baseline to 3 months. Secondary outcomes included change in cognition, mood, gait parameters, activity of daily living, and safety. Final analysis included 71 participants. No significant differences were observed between groups for the primary motor outcome at 3 months. Post hoc responder analysis showed that the 3-month group had higher proportions reaching the exploratory cognitive responder threshold compared with the 1-month group. Exploratory correlations between MoCA changes and motor parameter changes were weak and did not remain statistically significant after false discovery rate correction. No falls or adverse events were recorded throughout the trial. Because the primary endpoint was negative, attrition was high, no usual-care control was included, and the cognitive finding was limited to an exploratory post-hoc responder analysis, these findings do not permit causal inference and should be interpreted as hypothesis-generating, requiring further validation in larger, prespecified multi-arm comparative trials (Chinese Clinical Trial Registry Number: ChiCTR2500108323).
期刊介绍:
npj Digital Medicine is an online open-access journal that focuses on publishing peer-reviewed research in the field of digital medicine. The journal covers various aspects of digital medicine, including the application and implementation of digital and mobile technologies in clinical settings, virtual healthcare, and the use of artificial intelligence and informatics.
The primary goal of the journal is to support innovation and the advancement of healthcare through the integration of new digital and mobile technologies. When determining if a manuscript is suitable for publication, the journal considers four important criteria: novelty, clinical relevance, scientific rigor, and digital innovation.