Wiriya Mahikul, Mabel L. Prendergast, Gabriele K. Kerr, Sara Sousi, Benedict Hayhoe, Geva Greenfield, David Novillo-Ortiz, Josip Car, Azeem Majeed, Ana Luísa Neves
{"title":"Digital health capacity building across health workforce and education sector in the WHO European region","authors":"Wiriya Mahikul, Mabel L. Prendergast, Gabriele K. Kerr, Sara Sousi, Benedict Hayhoe, Geva Greenfield, David Novillo-Ortiz, Josip Car, Azeem Majeed, Ana Luísa Neves","doi":"10.1038/s41746-026-03337-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Disparities in digital capacity building across countries highlight the need for global upskilling. This study examined digital health capacity building across policy, workforce, and pre-service education domains across 53 countries of the WHO Europe Region. This was a cross-sectional ecological study using publicly available datasets. Descriptive and logistic regression analyses were performed. By 2022, 52.9% of countries had a digital health education strategy, 69.1% offered in-service training, and 59.6% provided certified student training. Countries demonstrating all three indicators tended to have higher literacy rates and strong R&D spending. A national digital health education strategy was associated with higher private or commercial funding for digital health, while more hospital beds per 1000 population were associated with lower odds of in-service digital health training. However, no factors were associated with health science students’ certified training, while public–private partnerships showed a non-significant positive association. Digital health capacity building across these indicators was uneven. Private-sector engagement and public–private funding and collaboration emerge as plausible correlates of policy on digital health capacity building. These findings suggest that policymakers should prioritize sustainable investment and cross-sector collaboration to strengthen digital health capacity building while further longitudinal and within-country studies are needed to confirm these associations.","PeriodicalId":19349,"journal":{"name":"NPJ Digital Medicine","volume":"404 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":18.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NPJ Digital Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-026-03337-3","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Disparities in digital capacity building across countries highlight the need for global upskilling. This study examined digital health capacity building across policy, workforce, and pre-service education domains across 53 countries of the WHO Europe Region. This was a cross-sectional ecological study using publicly available datasets. Descriptive and logistic regression analyses were performed. By 2022, 52.9% of countries had a digital health education strategy, 69.1% offered in-service training, and 59.6% provided certified student training. Countries demonstrating all three indicators tended to have higher literacy rates and strong R&D spending. A national digital health education strategy was associated with higher private or commercial funding for digital health, while more hospital beds per 1000 population were associated with lower odds of in-service digital health training. However, no factors were associated with health science students’ certified training, while public–private partnerships showed a non-significant positive association. Digital health capacity building across these indicators was uneven. Private-sector engagement and public–private funding and collaboration emerge as plausible correlates of policy on digital health capacity building. These findings suggest that policymakers should prioritize sustainable investment and cross-sector collaboration to strengthen digital health capacity building while further longitudinal and within-country studies are needed to confirm these associations.
期刊介绍:
npj Digital Medicine is an online open-access journal that focuses on publishing peer-reviewed research in the field of digital medicine. The journal covers various aspects of digital medicine, including the application and implementation of digital and mobile technologies in clinical settings, virtual healthcare, and the use of artificial intelligence and informatics.
The primary goal of the journal is to support innovation and the advancement of healthcare through the integration of new digital and mobile technologies. When determining if a manuscript is suitable for publication, the journal considers four important criteria: novelty, clinical relevance, scientific rigor, and digital innovation.