Digital health capacity building across health workforce and education sector in the WHO European region

IF 18 1区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Wiriya Mahikul, Mabel L. Prendergast, Gabriele K. Kerr, Sara Sousi, Benedict Hayhoe, Geva Greenfield, David Novillo-Ortiz, Josip Car, Azeem Majeed, Ana Luísa Neves
{"title":"Digital health capacity building across health workforce and education sector in the WHO European region","authors":"Wiriya Mahikul, Mabel L. Prendergast, Gabriele K. Kerr, Sara Sousi, Benedict Hayhoe, Geva Greenfield, David Novillo-Ortiz, Josip Car, Azeem Majeed, Ana Luísa Neves","doi":"10.1038/s41746-026-03337-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Disparities in digital capacity building across countries highlight the need for global upskilling. This study examined digital health capacity building across policy, workforce, and pre-service education domains across 53 countries of the WHO Europe Region. This was a cross-sectional ecological study using publicly available datasets. Descriptive and logistic regression analyses were performed. By 2022, 52.9% of countries had a digital health education strategy, 69.1% offered in-service training, and 59.6% provided certified student training. Countries demonstrating all three indicators tended to have higher literacy rates and strong R&D spending. A national digital health education strategy was associated with higher private or commercial funding for digital health, while more hospital beds per 1000 population were associated with lower odds of in-service digital health training. However, no factors were associated with health science students’ certified training, while public–private partnerships showed a non-significant positive association. Digital health capacity building across these indicators was uneven. Private-sector engagement and public–private funding and collaboration emerge as plausible correlates of policy on digital health capacity building. These findings suggest that policymakers should prioritize sustainable investment and cross-sector collaboration to strengthen digital health capacity building while further longitudinal and within-country studies are needed to confirm these associations.","PeriodicalId":19349,"journal":{"name":"NPJ Digital Medicine","volume":"404 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":18.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NPJ Digital Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-026-03337-3","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Disparities in digital capacity building across countries highlight the need for global upskilling. This study examined digital health capacity building across policy, workforce, and pre-service education domains across 53 countries of the WHO Europe Region. This was a cross-sectional ecological study using publicly available datasets. Descriptive and logistic regression analyses were performed. By 2022, 52.9% of countries had a digital health education strategy, 69.1% offered in-service training, and 59.6% provided certified student training. Countries demonstrating all three indicators tended to have higher literacy rates and strong R&D spending. A national digital health education strategy was associated with higher private or commercial funding for digital health, while more hospital beds per 1000 population were associated with lower odds of in-service digital health training. However, no factors were associated with health science students’ certified training, while public–private partnerships showed a non-significant positive association. Digital health capacity building across these indicators was uneven. Private-sector engagement and public–private funding and collaboration emerge as plausible correlates of policy on digital health capacity building. These findings suggest that policymakers should prioritize sustainable investment and cross-sector collaboration to strengthen digital health capacity building while further longitudinal and within-country studies are needed to confirm these associations.
世卫组织欧洲区域卫生人力和教育部门的数字卫生能力建设
各国在数字能力建设方面的差异凸显了全球技能提升的必要性。本研究调查了世卫组织欧洲区域53个国家在政策、劳动力和职前教育领域的数字卫生能力建设情况。这是一项利用公开数据集进行的横断面生态学研究。进行描述性和逻辑回归分析。到2022年,52.9%的国家制定了数字健康教育战略,69.1%的国家提供在职培训,59.6%的国家提供认证学生培训。具备所有三项指标的国家往往有更高的识字率和强大的研发支出。国家数字健康教育战略与为数字健康提供更多私人或商业资金有关,而每1000人拥有更多医院床位与在职数字健康培训的几率较低有关。然而,没有因素与卫生科学学生的认证培训相关,而公私伙伴关系显示出非显著的正相关。这些指标的数字卫生能力建设参差不齐。私营部门的参与和公私供资与合作成为数字卫生能力建设政策的合理关联。这些发现表明,决策者应优先考虑可持续投资和跨部门合作,以加强数字卫生能力建设,同时需要进一步进行纵向和国内研究,以确认这些关联。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
25.10
自引率
3.30%
发文量
170
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: npj Digital Medicine is an online open-access journal that focuses on publishing peer-reviewed research in the field of digital medicine. The journal covers various aspects of digital medicine, including the application and implementation of digital and mobile technologies in clinical settings, virtual healthcare, and the use of artificial intelligence and informatics. The primary goal of the journal is to support innovation and the advancement of healthcare through the integration of new digital and mobile technologies. When determining if a manuscript is suitable for publication, the journal considers four important criteria: novelty, clinical relevance, scientific rigor, and digital innovation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书