Task-structured modularity emerges in artificial networks and aligns with brain architecture

IF 29.8 1区 计算机科学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
Yuhang Wu, Shikuang Deng, Kangrui Du, Marcelo G. Mattar, Yifan Wu, Dani S. Bassett, Huajin Tang, Gang Pan, Shi Gu
{"title":"Task-structured modularity emerges in artificial networks and aligns with brain architecture","authors":"Yuhang Wu, Shikuang Deng, Kangrui Du, Marcelo G. Mattar, Yifan Wu, Dani S. Bassett, Huajin Tang, Gang Pan, Shi Gu","doi":"10.1038/s42256-026-01306-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Understanding how neural systems develop modular organization is fundamental to both neuroscience and artificial intelligence. Modular architectures are thought to be critical for adaptability and complex cognitive performance by enriching the brain’s ability to integrate and process information. While prior work posits that modularization emerges from physical constraints, such as minimizing metabolic wiring costs, these spatial models alone do not fully explain the functional organization of brain networks. A critical, unanswered question is how the functional demands of learning complex tasks computationally influence network topology. Here we demonstrate, using recurrent neural networks trained on cognitive tasks, how functional demands shape structural organization. We find that multitask learning paradigms enhance network modularity compared with single-task training, especially when task load strains the network’s capacity. Networks trained with incremental multitask learning, in particular, develop the highest degree of modularity and maintain superior performance. Furthermore, these task-induced networks exhibit structural properties that more closely resemble biological brain networks than models based solely on spatial constraints. These results provide a controlled computational account showing that functional demands can induce modular organization in artificial recurrent networks under capacity constraints, suggesting modularization as an adaptive response to the sequential introduction of complex tasks. Wu et al. show that neural networks learning multiple tasks organize into specialized modules, particularly under capacity constraints. Incremental multitask learning strengthens this modularity and produces architectures resembling brain networks.","PeriodicalId":48533,"journal":{"name":"Nature Machine Intelligence","volume":"8 10","pages":"1548-1559"},"PeriodicalIF":29.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nature Machine Intelligence","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s42256-026-01306-9","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Understanding how neural systems develop modular organization is fundamental to both neuroscience and artificial intelligence. Modular architectures are thought to be critical for adaptability and complex cognitive performance by enriching the brain’s ability to integrate and process information. While prior work posits that modularization emerges from physical constraints, such as minimizing metabolic wiring costs, these spatial models alone do not fully explain the functional organization of brain networks. A critical, unanswered question is how the functional demands of learning complex tasks computationally influence network topology. Here we demonstrate, using recurrent neural networks trained on cognitive tasks, how functional demands shape structural organization. We find that multitask learning paradigms enhance network modularity compared with single-task training, especially when task load strains the network’s capacity. Networks trained with incremental multitask learning, in particular, develop the highest degree of modularity and maintain superior performance. Furthermore, these task-induced networks exhibit structural properties that more closely resemble biological brain networks than models based solely on spatial constraints. These results provide a controlled computational account showing that functional demands can induce modular organization in artificial recurrent networks under capacity constraints, suggesting modularization as an adaptive response to the sequential introduction of complex tasks. Wu et al. show that neural networks learning multiple tasks organize into specialized modules, particularly under capacity constraints. Incremental multitask learning strengthens this modularity and produces architectures resembling brain networks.

Abstract Image

任务结构模块化出现在人工网络中,并与大脑结构保持一致
了解神经系统如何发展模块化组织是神经科学和人工智能的基础。模块化架构被认为是通过丰富大脑整合和处理信息的能力,对适应性和复杂的认知表现至关重要。虽然先前的工作假设模块化来自物理限制,例如最小化代谢布线成本,但这些空间模型本身并不能完全解释大脑网络的功能组织。一个关键的,未解决的问题是,学习复杂任务的功能需求如何影响计算网络拓扑。在这里,我们展示,使用在认知任务上训练的递归神经网络,功能需求如何塑造结构组织。我们发现,与单任务训练相比,多任务学习范式增强了网络的模块化,特别是当任务负载使网络容量紧张时。特别是用增量多任务学习训练的网络,发展出最高程度的模块化并保持优越的性能。此外,与仅基于空间约束的模型相比,这些任务诱导的网络表现出更接近生物大脑网络的结构特性。这些结果提供了一个受控的计算解释,表明功能需求可以在容量限制下诱导人工循环网络中的模块化组织,表明模块化是对复杂任务顺序引入的自适应响应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
36.90
自引率
2.10%
发文量
127
期刊介绍: Nature Machine Intelligence is a distinguished publication that presents original research and reviews on various topics in machine learning, robotics, and AI. Our focus extends beyond these fields, exploring their profound impact on other scientific disciplines, as well as societal and industrial aspects. We recognize limitless possibilities wherein machine intelligence can augment human capabilities and knowledge in domains like scientific exploration, healthcare, medical diagnostics, and the creation of safe and sustainable cities, transportation, and agriculture. Simultaneously, we acknowledge the emergence of ethical, social, and legal concerns due to the rapid pace of advancements. To foster interdisciplinary discussions on these far-reaching implications, Nature Machine Intelligence serves as a platform for dialogue facilitated through Comments, News Features, News & Views articles, and Correspondence. Our goal is to encourage a comprehensive examination of these subjects. Similar to all Nature-branded journals, Nature Machine Intelligence operates under the guidance of a team of skilled editors. We adhere to a fair and rigorous peer-review process, ensuring high standards of copy-editing and production, swift publication, and editorial independence.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书