Effect of Stress‐Induced Anisotropy on the Stability of Infinite Sandy Slopes

IF 3.6 2区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL
Revathy Manohar, Devi Priyanka Darisi, Sireesh Saride, Gopal Santana Phani Madabhushi
{"title":"Effect of Stress‐Induced Anisotropy on the Stability of Infinite Sandy Slopes","authors":"Revathy Manohar, Devi Priyanka Darisi, Sireesh Saride, Gopal Santana Phani Madabhushi","doi":"10.1002/nag.70448","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Reliable assessment of infinite sandy slope stability requires accounting for anisotropic in‐situ stress state imposed by slope geometry and self‐weight. This study presents a mechanics and state‐based analytical framework that introduces stress‐induced anisotropy through the effective principal stress ratio and quantifies its influence on shear resistance and factor of safety using standard soil parameters. Upper and lower bounds of are derived to determine the admissible slope stress‐state domain. The formulation links to slope geometry and provides a closed‐form evaluation without requiring complex anisotropic laboratory testing for routine applications. Parametric analyses were performed to assess the effect of anisotropy on soil and slope parameters. Stress‐path triaxial tests were conducted to examine consistency with the analytical trends. Clean river sand at different relative densities and a residual sandy soil from the 2024 Wayanad landslide site were tested under isotropic and anisotropic consolidation. Compared with isotropic consolidation, anisotropic consolidation produced 30%–40% reduction in peak deviatoric stress, greater contractive volumetric response, and earlier strain localization. Complementary undrained tests showed rapid pore‐pressure generation and contractive effective stress paths consistent with intense rainfall conditions. The framework is applied to published case studies as well as to the 2024 Wayanad landslide. Incorporating stress‐state anisotropy reduces the computed stability margins and can shift marginal slopes across commonly adopted screening thresholds. Generalized design charts relating , , and are developed to support screening‐level assessment and interpretation of proximity to commonly adopted stability thresholds for infinite sandy slopes.","PeriodicalId":13786,"journal":{"name":"International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics","volume":"6 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/nag.70448","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Reliable assessment of infinite sandy slope stability requires accounting for anisotropic in‐situ stress state imposed by slope geometry and self‐weight. This study presents a mechanics and state‐based analytical framework that introduces stress‐induced anisotropy through the effective principal stress ratio and quantifies its influence on shear resistance and factor of safety using standard soil parameters. Upper and lower bounds of are derived to determine the admissible slope stress‐state domain. The formulation links to slope geometry and provides a closed‐form evaluation without requiring complex anisotropic laboratory testing for routine applications. Parametric analyses were performed to assess the effect of anisotropy on soil and slope parameters. Stress‐path triaxial tests were conducted to examine consistency with the analytical trends. Clean river sand at different relative densities and a residual sandy soil from the 2024 Wayanad landslide site were tested under isotropic and anisotropic consolidation. Compared with isotropic consolidation, anisotropic consolidation produced 30%–40% reduction in peak deviatoric stress, greater contractive volumetric response, and earlier strain localization. Complementary undrained tests showed rapid pore‐pressure generation and contractive effective stress paths consistent with intense rainfall conditions. The framework is applied to published case studies as well as to the 2024 Wayanad landslide. Incorporating stress‐state anisotropy reduces the computed stability margins and can shift marginal slopes across commonly adopted screening thresholds. Generalized design charts relating , , and are developed to support screening‐level assessment and interpretation of proximity to commonly adopted stability thresholds for infinite sandy slopes.
应力诱导各向异性对无限砂质边坡稳定性的影响
无限砂质边坡稳定性的可靠评估需要考虑由边坡几何形状和自重施加的各向异性地应力状态。本研究提出了一个基于力学和状态的分析框架,通过有效主应力比引入应力诱导的各向异性,并使用标准土壤参数量化其对抗剪性和安全系数的影响。的上界和下界被导出来确定允许的边坡应力-状态域。该配方与斜坡几何形状有关,并提供封闭形式的评估,而不需要对常规应用进行复杂的各向异性实验室测试。对各向异性对土壤和边坡参数的影响进行了参数分析。进行应力路径三轴试验以检验与分析趋势的一致性。采用各向同性固结和各向异性固结对不同相对密度的清洁河砂和2024年Wayanad滑坡遗址残砂土进行了试验研究。与各向同性固结相比,各向异性固结使峰值偏应力降低30% ~ 40%,收缩体积响应更大,应变局部化更早。补充不排水试验显示快速孔隙压力产生和收缩有效应力路径与强降雨条件一致。该框架应用于已发表的案例研究以及2024年Wayanad滑坡。结合应力-状态各向异性降低了计算的稳定边界,并可以在通常采用的筛选阈值上移动边缘斜率。开发了与、、和相关的广义设计图表,以支持筛选级评估和解释与无限砂质边坡通常采用的稳定性阈值的接近程度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
12.50%
发文量
160
审稿时长
9 months
期刊介绍: The journal welcomes manuscripts that substantially contribute to the understanding of the complex mechanical behaviour of geomaterials (soils, rocks, concrete, ice, snow, and powders), through innovative experimental techniques, and/or through the development of novel numerical or hybrid experimental/numerical modelling concepts in geomechanics. Topics of interest include instabilities and localization, interface and surface phenomena, fracture and failure, multi-physics and other time-dependent phenomena, micromechanics and multi-scale methods, and inverse analysis and stochastic methods. Papers related to energy and environmental issues are particularly welcome. The illustration of the proposed methods and techniques to engineering problems is encouraged. However, manuscripts dealing with applications of existing methods, or proposing incremental improvements to existing methods – in particular marginal extensions of existing analytical solutions or numerical methods – will not be considered for review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书