“The Battle of the Rubric”: The Contested History of Clerical Dress in Victorian England

IF 0.3 3区 哲学 Q2 HISTORY
JOURNAL OF RELIGIOUS HISTORY Pub Date : 2026-09-30 Epub Date: 2026-04-16 DOI:10.1111/1467-9809.70077
Martin Wellings
{"title":"“The Battle of the Rubric”: The Contested History of Clerical Dress in Victorian England","authors":"Martin Wellings","doi":"10.1111/1467-9809.70077","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This article takes one facet of the controversy engulfing the Church of England in the mid-nineteenth century over ritualism—the interpretation of the rubrics in the <i>Book of Common Prayer</i> governing clerical dress—and explores it through the writings of three representatives of very different standpoints. It considers, first, the careful academic scholarship of James Craigie Robertson (1813–82), Professor of Ecclesiastical History at King's College, London, and Canon of Canterbury Cathedral, arguing against ritualist innovations. It then turns to Thomas Walter Perry (1815–91), a strong advocate for eucharistic vestments. Finally, it explores the polemical Protestantism of Richard Paul Blakeney (1820–84). Each author is considered the contexts of the Tractarian and ritualist movements and of the wider liturgical and aesthetic developments of the period. The article concludes that no church party emerged victorious from the “battle of the rubric,” and that the conflict significantly undermined the ideal of conformity to the <i>Book of Common Prayer</i> as a sign and source of unity in the Church of England.</p>","PeriodicalId":44035,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF RELIGIOUS HISTORY","volume":"50 3","pages":"251-265"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF RELIGIOUS HISTORY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1467-9809.70077","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/4/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article takes one facet of the controversy engulfing the Church of England in the mid-nineteenth century over ritualism—the interpretation of the rubrics in the Book of Common Prayer governing clerical dress—and explores it through the writings of three representatives of very different standpoints. It considers, first, the careful academic scholarship of James Craigie Robertson (1813–82), Professor of Ecclesiastical History at King's College, London, and Canon of Canterbury Cathedral, arguing against ritualist innovations. It then turns to Thomas Walter Perry (1815–91), a strong advocate for eucharistic vestments. Finally, it explores the polemical Protestantism of Richard Paul Blakeney (1820–84). Each author is considered the contexts of the Tractarian and ritualist movements and of the wider liturgical and aesthetic developments of the period. The article concludes that no church party emerged victorious from the “battle of the rubric,” and that the conflict significantly undermined the ideal of conformity to the Book of Common Prayer as a sign and source of unity in the Church of England.

“红布之战”:维多利亚时期英国神职人员着装的争议史
本文从19世纪中期席卷英国国教的一场关于仪式主义的争论——对《公祷书》中规定神职人员着装的规则的解释——的一个方面入手,通过三位立场迥异的代表的作品进行探讨。首先,它考虑了詹姆斯·克雷基·罗伯逊(James Craigie Robertson, 1813-82)严谨的学术研究,他是伦敦国王学院教会史教授,也是坎特伯雷大教堂的教长,他反对仪式主义的创新。然后转向托马斯·沃尔特·佩里(Thomas Walter Perry, 1815-91),他是圣餐服的强烈倡导者。最后,它探讨了理查德·保罗·布莱克尼(Richard Paul Blakeney, 1820-84)的论战性新教。每位作者都被认为是特拉克特和仪式主义运动的背景,以及该时期更广泛的礼仪和美学发展。这篇文章的结论是,没有一个教会政党能在“红布之战”中取得胜利,这场冲突极大地破坏了与《公祷书》(Book of Common Prayer)一致的理想,而《公祷书》是英国教会团结的标志和源泉。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
33.30%
发文量
88
期刊介绍: Journal of Religious History is a vital source of high quality information for all those interested in the place of religion in history. The Journal reviews current work on the history of religions and their relationship with all aspects of human experience. With high quality international contributors, the journal explores religion and its related subjects, along with debates on comparative method and theory in religious history.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书