Proteomic Signatures in Major Depressive Disorder and Depression Symptom Subtypes.

IF 14.7
Kathleen T Watson, Mariska Bot, Idit Kosti, Yuri Milaneschi, Audrey Evers, Natalie Rasgon, Karolyi Nikolich, Benoit Lehallier, Alan F Schatzberg, Brenda W J H Penninx
{"title":"Proteomic Signatures in Major Depressive Disorder and Depression Symptom Subtypes.","authors":"Kathleen T Watson, Mariska Bot, Idit Kosti, Yuri Milaneschi, Audrey Evers, Natalie Rasgon, Karolyi Nikolich, Benoit Lehallier, Alan F Schatzberg, Brenda W J H Penninx","doi":"10.1176/appi.ajp.20250891","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Major depressive disorder (MDD) is biologically heterogeneous and encompasses diverse symptom presentations. The authors used large-scale plasma proteomics to examine proteomic associations with categorical MDD status, continuous depression symptom severity, and DSM-IV-defined melancholic and atypical symptom dimensions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using the SomaScan platform, the authors conducted plasma proteomic profiling of 7,289 analytes in 1,881 participants from the Netherlands Study of Depression and Anxiety, including individuals with current MDD (N=469), individuals with remitted MDD (N=918), and healthy control subjects (N=494). They evaluated associations with diagnostic status, symptom severity, and melancholic and atypical symptom dimensions, followed by pathway enrichment analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eight aptamers, representing seven unique proteins, differed significantly between the current MDD and healthy control groups after false discovery rate (FDR) correction. Overall depression symptom severity was associated with 18 significant aptamers corresponding to 18 unique proteins, whereas atypical symptoms were associated with 58 significant aptamers corresponding to 57 unique proteins. In contrast, no individual proteins reached FDR significance for melancholic symptoms. Pathway analyses showed enrichment for extracellular matrix organization, collagen formation, complement cascade signaling, platelet activation, and hemostasis in relation to overall depression symptom severity. Gene set enrichment analysis of proteins ranked by association with melancholic symptoms identified pathway-level enrichment despite the absence of FDR-significant individual proteins, including mitochondrial stress response, protein translation, complement signaling, and nervous system development. Atypical symptoms showed enrichment of extracellular matrix organization, collagen formation, complement cascade signaling, insulin-like growth factor transport, and chromatin regulatory processes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings support biological heterogeneity within MDD and suggest that peripheral proteomic alterations are more strongly represented for specific symptom dimensions than for categorical diagnosis alone. Atypical symptoms showed pathway-level enrichment with significant individual protein associations. A dimensional framework may improve biological stratification of depression and refine biomarker-informed approaches to clinical symptom profiles.</p>","PeriodicalId":520786,"journal":{"name":"The American journal of psychiatry","volume":" ","pages":"appiajp20250891"},"PeriodicalIF":14.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The American journal of psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.20250891","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Major depressive disorder (MDD) is biologically heterogeneous and encompasses diverse symptom presentations. The authors used large-scale plasma proteomics to examine proteomic associations with categorical MDD status, continuous depression symptom severity, and DSM-IV-defined melancholic and atypical symptom dimensions.

Methods: Using the SomaScan platform, the authors conducted plasma proteomic profiling of 7,289 analytes in 1,881 participants from the Netherlands Study of Depression and Anxiety, including individuals with current MDD (N=469), individuals with remitted MDD (N=918), and healthy control subjects (N=494). They evaluated associations with diagnostic status, symptom severity, and melancholic and atypical symptom dimensions, followed by pathway enrichment analyses.

Results: Eight aptamers, representing seven unique proteins, differed significantly between the current MDD and healthy control groups after false discovery rate (FDR) correction. Overall depression symptom severity was associated with 18 significant aptamers corresponding to 18 unique proteins, whereas atypical symptoms were associated with 58 significant aptamers corresponding to 57 unique proteins. In contrast, no individual proteins reached FDR significance for melancholic symptoms. Pathway analyses showed enrichment for extracellular matrix organization, collagen formation, complement cascade signaling, platelet activation, and hemostasis in relation to overall depression symptom severity. Gene set enrichment analysis of proteins ranked by association with melancholic symptoms identified pathway-level enrichment despite the absence of FDR-significant individual proteins, including mitochondrial stress response, protein translation, complement signaling, and nervous system development. Atypical symptoms showed enrichment of extracellular matrix organization, collagen formation, complement cascade signaling, insulin-like growth factor transport, and chromatin regulatory processes.

Conclusions: These findings support biological heterogeneity within MDD and suggest that peripheral proteomic alterations are more strongly represented for specific symptom dimensions than for categorical diagnosis alone. Atypical symptoms showed pathway-level enrichment with significant individual protein associations. A dimensional framework may improve biological stratification of depression and refine biomarker-informed approaches to clinical symptom profiles.

重度抑郁障碍和抑郁症状亚型的蛋白质组学特征。
目的:重度抑郁障碍(MDD)具有生物学异质性,包括多种症状表现。作者使用大规模血浆蛋白质组学来检测蛋白质组学与MDD分类状态、持续抑郁症状严重程度以及dsm - iv定义的抑郁和非典型症状维度的关联。方法:使用SomaScan平台,作者对来自荷兰抑郁和焦虑研究的1881名参与者的7289名分析物进行了血浆蛋白质组学分析,包括当前MDD患者(N=469), MDD缓解患者(N=918)和健康对照受试者(N=494)。他们评估了诊断状态、症状严重程度、抑郁和非典型症状维度的相关性,随后进行了途径富集分析。结果:在错误发现率(FDR)校正后,8个适体,代表7种独特的蛋白质,在当前MDD组和健康对照组之间存在显著差异。总体抑郁症状的严重程度与18种特异蛋白对应的18个显著适配体相关,而非典型症状与57种特异蛋白对应的58个显著适配体相关。相比之下,没有单个蛋白质在抑郁症状中达到FDR显著性。通路分析显示,细胞外基质组织、胶原形成、补体级联信号、血小板活化和止血的富集与整体抑郁症状的严重程度有关。对与抑郁症状相关的蛋白质进行基因集富集分析,发现尽管缺乏fdr显著的个体蛋白质,包括线粒体应激反应、蛋白质翻译、补体信号和神经系统发育,但仍存在途径水平的富集。非典型症状表现为细胞外基质组织、胶原形成、补体级联信号、胰岛素样生长因子运输和染色质调节过程的富集。结论:这些发现支持MDD的生物学异质性,并表明外周蛋白质组学改变在特定症状维度上比单独的分类诊断更有代表性。非典型症状表现为途径水平的富集,具有显著的个体蛋白关联。维度框架可以改善抑郁症的生物学分层,并改进临床症状概况的生物标志物知情方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书