A Prediction Score for Cardiovascular Implantable Electronic Device Infection in Non-Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia.

IF 1.3
Supavit Chesdachai, Larry M Baddour, Guillermo Cuervo, Abhishek J Deshmukh, Christopher V DeSimone, Brian D Lahr, Daniel C DeSimone
{"title":"A Prediction Score for Cardiovascular Implantable Electronic Device Infection in Non-Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia.","authors":"Supavit Chesdachai, Larry M Baddour, Guillermo Cuervo, Abhishek J Deshmukh, Christopher V DeSimone, Brian D Lahr, Daniel C DeSimone","doi":"10.1111/pace.70456","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients with cardiovascular implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) who develop bacteremia require risk stratification for device infection. Although prediction scores exist for Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia, no comparable CIED-specific tool exists for non-S. aureus bacteremia. Our study aimed to estimate the probability of definite CIED infection in adults with non-S. aureus bacteremia without pocket infection.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a prediction-model analysis of adults with CIEDs and non-S. aureus bacteremia, comprising gram-negative bacteremia (GNB) and gram-positive cocci other than S. aureus (GPC) bacteremia, at Mayo Clinic Rochester during 2012-2019. Patients with pocket infection were excluded. Definite CIED infection was classified using 2019 European Heart Rhythm Association criteria. Penalized logistic regression was used to construct two prediction models for definite infection: a full model with nine prespecified predictors, and a reduced model from which a point-based risk score could be obtained.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 282 patients with CIEDs developed non-S. aureus bacteremia. Median age was 75 years; 69% were men. GPC bacteremia occurred in 156 patients (55%) and GNB in 126 (45%). Sixty patients (21%) had definite CIED infection. Both the full and reduced models demonstrated excellent predictive discrimination (apparent area under receiver operating characteristic curve 0.946 and 0.940). The reduced model retained four predictors: GPC bacteremia, persistent bacteremia, longer time to positivity, and unknown bacteremia source.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A four-variable risk score incorporating organism category, persistent bacteremia, time to positivity, and unknown bacteremia source may guide early device-focused evaluation, but external validation is required before clinical adoption.</p>","PeriodicalId":520740,"journal":{"name":"Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/pace.70456","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Patients with cardiovascular implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) who develop bacteremia require risk stratification for device infection. Although prediction scores exist for Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia, no comparable CIED-specific tool exists for non-S. aureus bacteremia. Our study aimed to estimate the probability of definite CIED infection in adults with non-S. aureus bacteremia without pocket infection.

Methods: We performed a prediction-model analysis of adults with CIEDs and non-S. aureus bacteremia, comprising gram-negative bacteremia (GNB) and gram-positive cocci other than S. aureus (GPC) bacteremia, at Mayo Clinic Rochester during 2012-2019. Patients with pocket infection were excluded. Definite CIED infection was classified using 2019 European Heart Rhythm Association criteria. Penalized logistic regression was used to construct two prediction models for definite infection: a full model with nine prespecified predictors, and a reduced model from which a point-based risk score could be obtained.

Results: A total of 282 patients with CIEDs developed non-S. aureus bacteremia. Median age was 75 years; 69% were men. GPC bacteremia occurred in 156 patients (55%) and GNB in 126 (45%). Sixty patients (21%) had definite CIED infection. Both the full and reduced models demonstrated excellent predictive discrimination (apparent area under receiver operating characteristic curve 0.946 and 0.940). The reduced model retained four predictors: GPC bacteremia, persistent bacteremia, longer time to positivity, and unknown bacteremia source.

Conclusion: A four-variable risk score incorporating organism category, persistent bacteremia, time to positivity, and unknown bacteremia source may guide early device-focused evaluation, but external validation is required before clinical adoption.

非金黄色葡萄球菌菌血症患者心血管植入式电子设备感染的预测评分。
背景:心血管植入式电子设备(CIEDs)患者发生菌血症需要对设备感染进行风险分层。虽然存在金黄色葡萄球菌菌血症的预测评分,但对于非金黄色葡萄球菌,没有类似的cied特异性工具。球菌菌血症。我们的研究旨在估计非s型成人明确CIED感染的概率。无口袋感染的金黄色菌血症。方法:我们对成人cied和非s进行预测模型分析。2012-2019年期间在罗切斯特梅奥诊所发现的金黄色葡萄球菌菌血症,包括革兰氏阴性菌血症(GNB)和金黄色葡萄球菌(GPC)以外的革兰氏阳性球菌菌血症。排除有口袋感染的患者。根据2019年欧洲心律协会标准对明确的CIED感染进行分类。使用惩罚逻辑回归构建了两个明确感染的预测模型:一个包含九个预先指定的预测因子的完整模型,以及一个可以从中获得基于点的风险评分的简化模型。结果:282例cied患者发生非s。球菌菌血症。中位年龄为75岁;69%是男性。156例(55%)发生GPC菌血症,126例(45%)发生GNB菌血症。60例(21%)有明确的CIED感染。完整模型和简化模型均表现出良好的预测辨别能力(受试者工作特征曲线下表观面积分别为0.946和0.940)。简化模型保留了四个预测因子:GPC菌血症、持续性菌血症、较长的阳性时间和未知菌血症来源。结论:一个包含生物体类别、持续性菌血症、到阳性时间和未知菌血症来源的四变量风险评分可以指导早期以器械为重点的评估,但在临床采用之前需要外部验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书