Disrupting antimicrobial resistance in food systems from a One Health perspective: a complex systems analysis in Canada, Senegal and the Netherlands.

Chloe Clifford Astbury, Catherine Hu, Mouhamadou Moustapha Sow, Mamadou Ciss, Michel Dückers, Caroline Schneeberger, Lotte van Heuvel, Cécile Aenishaenslin, Ria Benko, Marion Bordier, Valentina De Leon, Olivier Kambere Kavulikirwa, Éva Loboda, Arabi Rajan, Arne Ruckert, Sharon Villanueva, Mary Wiktorowicz, Tarra L Penney
{"title":"Disrupting antimicrobial resistance in food systems from a One Health perspective: a complex systems analysis in Canada, Senegal and the Netherlands.","authors":"Chloe Clifford Astbury, Catherine Hu, Mouhamadou Moustapha Sow, Mamadou Ciss, Michel Dückers, Caroline Schneeberger, Lotte van Heuvel, Cécile Aenishaenslin, Ria Benko, Marion Bordier, Valentina De Leon, Olivier Kambere Kavulikirwa, Éva Loboda, Arabi Rajan, Arne Ruckert, Sharon Villanueva, Mary Wiktorowicz, Tarra L Penney","doi":"10.1186/s44263-026-00322-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Food systems are a key contributor to antimicrobial resistance (AMR). Given the multi-sectoral nature of AMR, a One Health perspective has been advocated. Recent research situates AMR as an emerging property of a complex system, a perspective which can help identify root drivers of AMR and theorise the impacts of proposed solutions. This study aims to combine systems modelling and a One Health perspective to identify system-level dynamics and priority actions for addressing AMR in food systems.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used group model building, a participatory approach to systems modelling, in three countries: Canada, Senegal, and the Netherlands. Stakeholders from policy, research, civil society and industry developed qualitative systems models and identified priority actions for AMR mitigation. Workshop outputs were synthesised in the form of causal loop diagrams and iteratively refined with stakeholders to ensure they appropriately reflected their perspectives. Diagrams were analysed using systems archetypes, a conceptual tool for diagnosing recurring dynamics in complex systems, to identify common structural drivers of AMR and potential intervention points across countries. We then drew on systems theory and the priority actions identified by stakeholders to highlight potential paths to disrupting these archetypes, thereby reducing the contribution of food systems to AMR.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Across the countries, 39 stakeholders participated in workshops. The archetypes analysis highlighted how short-term exploitation of shared resources, reliance on antimicrobials at the expense of investing in alternative solutions, and dominance of antimicrobial-intensive production systems may contribute to AMR. Priority actions that were positioned to disrupt these archetypes included regulation, education, consumer engagement, and shift towards different production systems.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>AMR in food systems arises from recurring structural dynamics that require context-appropriate, systems-informed solutions. Countering short-term exploitation of shared antimicrobial resources calls for regulation, surveillance and education. Addressing overreliance on antimicrobials requires balanced strategies pairing judicious use with sustained investment in alternatives such as livestock management, infection prevention and vaccination. Disrupting the dominance of antimicrobial-intensive production systems calls for regulatory measures and consumer pressure to level the playing field with lower-use systems. Together, these findings point to solutions that employ a systems perspective on design, implementation and evaluation to enable long-term effectiveness in AMR mitigation.</p>","PeriodicalId":519903,"journal":{"name":"BMC global and public health","volume":"4 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13621477/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC global and public health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s44263-026-00322-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Food systems are a key contributor to antimicrobial resistance (AMR). Given the multi-sectoral nature of AMR, a One Health perspective has been advocated. Recent research situates AMR as an emerging property of a complex system, a perspective which can help identify root drivers of AMR and theorise the impacts of proposed solutions. This study aims to combine systems modelling and a One Health perspective to identify system-level dynamics and priority actions for addressing AMR in food systems.

Methods: We used group model building, a participatory approach to systems modelling, in three countries: Canada, Senegal, and the Netherlands. Stakeholders from policy, research, civil society and industry developed qualitative systems models and identified priority actions for AMR mitigation. Workshop outputs were synthesised in the form of causal loop diagrams and iteratively refined with stakeholders to ensure they appropriately reflected their perspectives. Diagrams were analysed using systems archetypes, a conceptual tool for diagnosing recurring dynamics in complex systems, to identify common structural drivers of AMR and potential intervention points across countries. We then drew on systems theory and the priority actions identified by stakeholders to highlight potential paths to disrupting these archetypes, thereby reducing the contribution of food systems to AMR.

Results: Across the countries, 39 stakeholders participated in workshops. The archetypes analysis highlighted how short-term exploitation of shared resources, reliance on antimicrobials at the expense of investing in alternative solutions, and dominance of antimicrobial-intensive production systems may contribute to AMR. Priority actions that were positioned to disrupt these archetypes included regulation, education, consumer engagement, and shift towards different production systems.

Conclusions: AMR in food systems arises from recurring structural dynamics that require context-appropriate, systems-informed solutions. Countering short-term exploitation of shared antimicrobial resources calls for regulation, surveillance and education. Addressing overreliance on antimicrobials requires balanced strategies pairing judicious use with sustained investment in alternatives such as livestock management, infection prevention and vaccination. Disrupting the dominance of antimicrobial-intensive production systems calls for regulatory measures and consumer pressure to level the playing field with lower-use systems. Together, these findings point to solutions that employ a systems perspective on design, implementation and evaluation to enable long-term effectiveness in AMR mitigation.

从同一个健康的角度破坏食品系统中的抗菌素耐药性:加拿大、塞内加尔和荷兰的复杂系统分析。
背景:粮食系统是产生抗微生物药物耐药性的关键因素。鉴于抗微生物药物耐药性的多部门性质,一直提倡“同一个健康”观点。最近的研究将AMR视为一个复杂系统的新兴属性,这一视角可以帮助识别AMR的根本驱动因素,并将提出的解决方案的影响理论化。本研究旨在将系统建模和“一个健康”的观点结合起来,以确定解决粮食系统中抗菌素耐药性的系统级动态和优先行动。方法:我们在三个国家:加拿大、塞内加尔和荷兰使用了小组模型构建,这是一种参与式系统建模方法。来自政策、研究、民间社会和工业界的利益攸关方开发了定性系统模型,并确定了缓解抗菌素耐药性的优先行动。研讨会产出以因果循环图的形式进行综合,并与利益相关者一起反复改进,以确保它们适当地反映了他们的观点。使用系统原型(用于诊断复杂系统中反复出现的动态的概念工具)对图表进行了分析,以确定各国抗菌素耐药性的共同结构驱动因素和潜在干预点。然后,我们利用系统理论和利益相关者确定的优先行动来强调破坏这些原型的潜在途径,从而减少粮食系统对抗菌素耐药性的贡献。结果:在各国,39个利益相关者参加了讲习班。原型分析强调了短期利用共享资源、以投资替代解决方案为代价依赖抗菌素以及抗菌素密集型生产系统的主导地位可能会导致抗生素耐药性。被定位为破坏这些原型的优先行动包括监管、教育、消费者参与和向不同生产系统的转变。结论:粮食系统中的抗菌素耐药性是由反复出现的结构动态引起的,需要因地制宜、系统知情的解决方案。打击共享抗微生物药物资源的短期利用需要进行监管、监测和教育。解决对抗微生物药物的过度依赖需要平衡的战略,将明智使用与牲畜管理、感染预防和疫苗接种等替代方案的持续投资相结合。要打破抗菌素密集型生产系统的主导地位,就需要采取监管措施,并向消费者施加压力,与低用量系统创造公平的竞争环境。综上所述,这些发现指出了在设计、实施和评估方面采用系统视角的解决方案,以实现抗生素耐药性缓解的长期有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书