International Variations in the Use of Antimicrobials and Management of Sepsis: A Survey of 382 Neonatal Units in 12 Countries.

IF 3
Neonatology Pub Date : 2026-09-29 DOI:10.1159/neo/adsag014
Joanna Seliga-Siwecka, Justyna Romańska, Kei Lui, Marisa Márcia Mussi-Pinhata, Laura San Feliciano, Liisa Lehtonen, Kjell Helenius, Maximo Vento, Dirk Bassler, Satoshi Kusuda, Valerie Biran, Gil Klinger, Tetsuya Isayama, Monia Puglia, Malcolm Battin, Mikael Norman, Lars Naver, Mark Adams, Brian Reichman, Marc Beltempo, Prakesh S Shah
{"title":"International Variations in the Use of Antimicrobials and Management of Sepsis: A Survey of 382 Neonatal Units in 12 Countries.","authors":"Joanna Seliga-Siwecka, Justyna Romańska, Kei Lui, Marisa Márcia Mussi-Pinhata, Laura San Feliciano, Liisa Lehtonen, Kjell Helenius, Maximo Vento, Dirk Bassler, Satoshi Kusuda, Valerie Biran, Gil Klinger, Tetsuya Isayama, Monia Puglia, Malcolm Battin, Mikael Norman, Lars Naver, Mark Adams, Brian Reichman, Marc Beltempo, Prakesh S Shah","doi":"10.1159/neo/adsag014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Antimicrobial exposure is nearly universal among very preterm infants, yet evidence to guide optimal treatment duration and sepsis management remains limited. Unnecessary prolonged antimicrobial use may contribute to adverse outcomes and antimicrobial resistance. We aimed to characterize international practices in the management of culture-proven infections in infants born <29 weeks' gestation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study surveyed neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) across 12 networks within the International Network for Evaluating Outcomes of Neonates. A pre-piloted online questionnaire captured unit-level practices regarding treatment duration for culture-proven infections, antifungal prophylaxis, blood culture collection, and central line management. Responses were analyzed descriptively at the network and unit levels.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 608 eligible NICUs in this study, 382 (62.8%) responded. A 7-day treatment duration was most commonly reported for Gram-positive sepsis (45.2% of NICUs), whereas 14 days was most commonly reported for Gram-negative sepsis (44.4%). Treatment durations were longer for concurrent meningitis: 57% of units reported 14 days for Gram-positive meningitis and 69.2% reported 21 days for Gram-negative meningitis. Antifungal prophylaxis was reported by 62.1% of units. Most NICUs (79.7%) routinely obtained blood cultures from a single sterile site. Overall, 75.7% of units reported central line removal for Gram-negative sepsis and 57.3% for Gram-positive sepsis.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Reported antimicrobial duration and sepsis management practices for very preterm infants varied across neonatal units and international networks. These findings underscore persistent uncertainty and the urgent need for high-quality evidence to inform standardized, evidence-based antimicrobial stewardship in this vulnerable population.</p>","PeriodicalId":94152,"journal":{"name":"Neonatology","volume":" ","pages":"1"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neonatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/neo/adsag014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Antimicrobial exposure is nearly universal among very preterm infants, yet evidence to guide optimal treatment duration and sepsis management remains limited. Unnecessary prolonged antimicrobial use may contribute to adverse outcomes and antimicrobial resistance. We aimed to characterize international practices in the management of culture-proven infections in infants born <29 weeks' gestation.

Methods: This cross-sectional study surveyed neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) across 12 networks within the International Network for Evaluating Outcomes of Neonates. A pre-piloted online questionnaire captured unit-level practices regarding treatment duration for culture-proven infections, antifungal prophylaxis, blood culture collection, and central line management. Responses were analyzed descriptively at the network and unit levels.

Results: Of 608 eligible NICUs in this study, 382 (62.8%) responded. A 7-day treatment duration was most commonly reported for Gram-positive sepsis (45.2% of NICUs), whereas 14 days was most commonly reported for Gram-negative sepsis (44.4%). Treatment durations were longer for concurrent meningitis: 57% of units reported 14 days for Gram-positive meningitis and 69.2% reported 21 days for Gram-negative meningitis. Antifungal prophylaxis was reported by 62.1% of units. Most NICUs (79.7%) routinely obtained blood cultures from a single sterile site. Overall, 75.7% of units reported central line removal for Gram-negative sepsis and 57.3% for Gram-positive sepsis.

Conclusion: Reported antimicrobial duration and sepsis management practices for very preterm infants varied across neonatal units and international networks. These findings underscore persistent uncertainty and the urgent need for high-quality evidence to inform standardized, evidence-based antimicrobial stewardship in this vulnerable population.

抗菌药物使用和败血症管理的国际差异:对12个国家382个新生儿单位的调查。
背景:抗菌药物暴露在极早产儿中几乎是普遍的,但指导最佳治疗时间和败血症管理的证据仍然有限。不必要的长期抗菌素使用可能导致不良后果和抗菌素耐药性。方法:本横断面研究调查了国际新生儿结局评估网络内12个网络的新生儿重症监护病房(NICUs)。预先试点的在线问卷收集了有关培养证实感染的治疗时间、抗真菌预防、血培养收集和中心静脉管理的单位级实践。在网络和单位层面对反应进行描述性分析。结果:在608个符合条件的nicu中,382个(62.8%)有反应。革兰氏阳性脓毒症最常见的治疗时间为7天(45.2%的新生儿重症监护病房),而革兰氏阴性脓毒症最常见的治疗时间为14天(44.4%)。并发脑膜炎的治疗时间更长:57%的单位报告革兰氏阳性脑膜炎为14天,69.2%的单位报告革兰氏阴性脑膜炎为21天。62.1%的单位报告了抗真菌预防。大多数新生儿重症监护病房(79.7%)常规从单个无菌部位进行血培养。总体而言,75.7%的单位报告了革兰氏阴性脓毒症的中心静脉切除,57.3%的革兰氏阳性脓毒症。结论:新生儿单位和国际网络中报道的早产儿抗菌药物持续时间和败血症管理实践各不相同。这些发现强调了持续存在的不确定性和迫切需要高质量证据,以便为这一弱势群体的标准化、循证抗菌药物管理提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书