Comparative Renal Effectiveness of GLP-1RA and SGLT2i in US Veterans with Type 2 Diabetes and CKD.

Phyo Than Htoo, Elisabetta Patorno, Janinne Ortega-Montiel, Deborah J Wexler, Ariela Orkaby, Julie M Paik
{"title":"Comparative Renal Effectiveness of GLP-1RA and SGLT2i in US Veterans with Type 2 Diabetes and CKD.","authors":"Phyo Than Htoo, Elisabetta Patorno, Janinne Ortega-Montiel, Deborah J Wexler, Ariela Orkaby, Julie M Paik","doi":"10.2215/CJN.0000001244","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To address limited comparative evidence in older, clinically complex patients with type 2 diabetes and moderate-to-advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD), we compared nephroprotective outcomes after GLP-1RA versus SGLT2i initiation among US Veterans aged ≥65 years with type 2 diabetes and CKD stages 3-4 during 2016-2025.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Within the U.S. Veterans Health Administration database, we identified individuals with type 2 diabetes and CKD stage 3-4 (eGFR 15 to <60 mL/min/1.73 m2) initiating GLP-1RA vs SGLT2i. GLP-1RA formulations approved for weight loss were excluded. The primary outcome was a composite of ESKD, sustained 40% decline in kidney function, or all-cause mortality, with individual components being secondary outcomes. After controlling for >100 covariates including comorbidities, medications, clinical parameters, and laboratory results using propensity score matching weights, we estimated hazard ratios and rate differences. Analyses were stratified by CKD stages, HbA1c, and body mass index.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 28,365 GLP-1RA and 78,354 SGLT2i initiators [mean (SD) age: 74 (6) years vs. 76 (6) years]. Over a median follow-up of 11 months, the weighted risks for the primary outcome were similar between treatment groups [HR (95% CI): 1.00 (0.94, 1.07); RD per 1,000 person-years (95% CI): 0.0002 (-0.0037, 0.0042)], mainly attributed to the similar risk for all-cause mortality. The risks of the secondary outcomes were higher in GLP-1RA vs. SGLT2i initiators, but higher risks for sustained kidney function decline and ESKD. Findings were consistent across variations in baseline CKD stage, history of CVD, BMI, and HbA1c level. Absolute rate differences for major kidney disease events and ESKD were larger in patients with more advanced CKD stages.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings suggest broadly comparable overall kidney and survival outcomes, with potential advantages of SGLT2is for the risks of kidney function decline and incident ESKD across metabolic subgroups in this older adult cohort.</p>","PeriodicalId":520592,"journal":{"name":"Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2215/CJN.0000001244","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To address limited comparative evidence in older, clinically complex patients with type 2 diabetes and moderate-to-advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD), we compared nephroprotective outcomes after GLP-1RA versus SGLT2i initiation among US Veterans aged ≥65 years with type 2 diabetes and CKD stages 3-4 during 2016-2025.

Methods: Within the U.S. Veterans Health Administration database, we identified individuals with type 2 diabetes and CKD stage 3-4 (eGFR 15 to <60 mL/min/1.73 m2) initiating GLP-1RA vs SGLT2i. GLP-1RA formulations approved for weight loss were excluded. The primary outcome was a composite of ESKD, sustained 40% decline in kidney function, or all-cause mortality, with individual components being secondary outcomes. After controlling for >100 covariates including comorbidities, medications, clinical parameters, and laboratory results using propensity score matching weights, we estimated hazard ratios and rate differences. Analyses were stratified by CKD stages, HbA1c, and body mass index.

Results: We identified 28,365 GLP-1RA and 78,354 SGLT2i initiators [mean (SD) age: 74 (6) years vs. 76 (6) years]. Over a median follow-up of 11 months, the weighted risks for the primary outcome were similar between treatment groups [HR (95% CI): 1.00 (0.94, 1.07); RD per 1,000 person-years (95% CI): 0.0002 (-0.0037, 0.0042)], mainly attributed to the similar risk for all-cause mortality. The risks of the secondary outcomes were higher in GLP-1RA vs. SGLT2i initiators, but higher risks for sustained kidney function decline and ESKD. Findings were consistent across variations in baseline CKD stage, history of CVD, BMI, and HbA1c level. Absolute rate differences for major kidney disease events and ESKD were larger in patients with more advanced CKD stages.

Conclusions: These findings suggest broadly comparable overall kidney and survival outcomes, with potential advantages of SGLT2is for the risks of kidney function decline and incident ESKD across metabolic subgroups in this older adult cohort.

GLP-1RA和SGLT2i在美国2型糖尿病和CKD退伍军人肾脏疗效的比较
目的:为了解决老年、临床复杂的2型糖尿病和中晚期慢性肾病(CKD)患者的有限比较证据,我们比较了2016-2025年期间年龄≥65岁、2型糖尿病和CKD 3-4期的美国退伍军人服用GLP-1RA和SGLT2i后的肾保护结果。方法:在美国退伍军人健康管理局的数据库中,我们确定了2型糖尿病和CKD阶段3-4的个体(eGFR 15至100),协变量包括合并症、药物、临床参数和实验室结果,使用倾向评分匹配权重,我们估计了风险比和比率差异。分析按CKD分期、HbA1c和体重指数进行分层。结果:我们确定了28,365个GLP-1RA和78,354个SGLT2i起始物[平均(SD)年龄:74(6)岁对76(6)岁]。在中位随访11个月期间,各治疗组间主要结局的加权风险相似[HR (95% CI): 1.00 (0.94, 1.07);RD / 1000人年(95% CI): 0.0002(-0.0037, 0.0042),主要归因于全因死亡率的相似风险。与SGLT2i启动者相比,GLP-1RA的次要结局风险更高,但持续肾功能下降和ESKD的风险更高。在基线CKD分期、CVD史、BMI和HbA1c水平的变化中,研究结果是一致的。在CKD晚期患者中,主要肾脏疾病事件和ESKD的绝对发生率差异更大。结论:这些研究结果表明,在这个老年人队列中,SGLT2is在代谢亚组中肾功能下降和ESKD发生率方面具有潜在优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书