Reintubation in the ICU, a non-solved problem. What can a decade of automated data show us?: Reintubación en UCI, un problema sin resolver. ¿Qué nos puede decir una década de datos automatizados?

Sara Manrique, Pau Orts, Gonzalo Sirgo, Laura Pérez, Julen Berrueta, Alejandro García-Martínez, María Bodí
{"title":"Reintubation in the ICU, a non-solved problem. What can a decade of automated data show us?: Reintubación en UCI, un problema sin resolver. ¿Qué nos puede decir una década de datos automatizados?","authors":"Sara Manrique, Pau Orts, Gonzalo Sirgo, Laura Pérez, Julen Berrueta, Alejandro García-Martínez, María Bodí","doi":"10.1016/j.medine.2026.502604","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To identify risk factors for reintubation in critically ill patients after planned extubation using clinical data automatically extracted from the clinical information system.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A retrospective observational study was conducted.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Intensive Care Unit (ICU) of Joan XXIII University Hospital (Tarragona, Spain) (2014-2024).</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Adult patients admitted to the ICU who required invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) for more than 48 h.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Automated extraction of clinical, ventilatory, hemodynamic, and laboratory test data (Centricity Critical Care®). Median, maximum, and minimum values were calculated within predefined time windows of 6 and 24 h prior to extubation.</p><p><strong>Main variables of interest: </strong>Reintubation rate, pressure support (PS), heart rate (HR), prior administration of antibiotics, ICU stay, incidence of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP), and mortality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The overall reintubation rate was 11%. Multivariate analysis showed that higher mean PS (OR: 1.36; 95%CI: 1.10-1.67) and higher HR (OR: 1.22; 95%CI: 1.00-1.49) in the previous 6 h were independent predictors of reintubation. Antibiotic administration in the previous 24 h showed a protective effect (OR: 0.55; 95%CI: 0.37-0.82). The model achieved an AUC of 0.63 (95%CI, bootstrap: 0.52-0.72). Reintubated patients had a longer ICU stay, a higher incidence of VAP, and greater mortality.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Higher heart rate and pressure support values before extubation were associated with an increased risk of reintubation, whereas antibiotic therapy within 24 h before extubation appeared to have a protective effect. The automated analysis of longitudinal data obtained from electronic health records allowed the identification of clinically plausible associations related to reintubation.</p>","PeriodicalId":94139,"journal":{"name":"Medicina intensiva","volume":" ","pages":"502604"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicina intensiva","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.medine.2026.502604","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To identify risk factors for reintubation in critically ill patients after planned extubation using clinical data automatically extracted from the clinical information system.

Design: A retrospective observational study was conducted.

Setting: Intensive Care Unit (ICU) of Joan XXIII University Hospital (Tarragona, Spain) (2014-2024).

Patients: Adult patients admitted to the ICU who required invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) for more than 48 h.

Interventions: Automated extraction of clinical, ventilatory, hemodynamic, and laboratory test data (Centricity Critical Care®). Median, maximum, and minimum values were calculated within predefined time windows of 6 and 24 h prior to extubation.

Main variables of interest: Reintubation rate, pressure support (PS), heart rate (HR), prior administration of antibiotics, ICU stay, incidence of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP), and mortality.

Results: The overall reintubation rate was 11%. Multivariate analysis showed that higher mean PS (OR: 1.36; 95%CI: 1.10-1.67) and higher HR (OR: 1.22; 95%CI: 1.00-1.49) in the previous 6 h were independent predictors of reintubation. Antibiotic administration in the previous 24 h showed a protective effect (OR: 0.55; 95%CI: 0.37-0.82). The model achieved an AUC of 0.63 (95%CI, bootstrap: 0.52-0.72). Reintubated patients had a longer ICU stay, a higher incidence of VAP, and greater mortality.

Conclusions: Higher heart rate and pressure support values before extubation were associated with an increased risk of reintubation, whereas antibiotic therapy within 24 h before extubation appeared to have a protective effect. The automated analysis of longitudinal data obtained from electronic health records allowed the identification of clinically plausible associations related to reintubation.

ICU重新插管,一个未解决的问题。这是一个很好的例子。: UCI重新插管,一个未解决的问题。十年的自动化数据能告诉我们什么?
目的:利用临床信息系统自动提取的临床数据,识别危重患者计划拔管后再插管的危险因素。设计:进行回顾性观察性研究。地点:西班牙塔拉戈纳Joan XXIII大学医院重症监护室(ICU)(2014-2024)。患者:ICU收治的需要有创机械通气(IMV)超过48小时的成年患者。干预措施:自动提取临床、通气、血流动力学和实验室测试数据(Centricity Critical Care®)。在拔管前6和24小时的预定义时间窗内计算中值、最大值和最小值。主要感兴趣的变量:插管率、压力支持(PS)、心率(HR)、抗生素用药史、ICU住院时间、呼吸机相关性肺炎(VAP)发生率和死亡率。结果:总再插管率为11%。多因素分析显示,前6 h较高的平均PS (OR: 1.36; 95%CI: 1.10 ~ 1.67)和较高的HR (OR: 1.22; 95%CI: 1.00 ~ 1.49)是再插管的独立预测因子。前24 h给予抗生素有保护作用(OR: 0.55; 95%CI: 0.37-0.82)。该模型的AUC为0.63 (95%CI, bootstrap: 0.52-0.72)。重新插管的患者在ICU的停留时间更长,VAP的发生率更高,死亡率更高。结论:拔管前较高的心率和压力支持值与再插管风险增加相关,而拔管前24小时内的抗生素治疗似乎具有保护作用。通过对从电子健康记录中获得的纵向数据进行自动分析,可以确定与再插管相关的临床可信关联。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书