Preoperative patient expectations and postoperative satisfaction following singlelevel unilateral biportal endoscopic lumbar discectomy: Are higher expectations associated with lower satisfaction?

IF 1
Yusuf Bayram, Muhammed Enes Karataş, İbrahim Uzunlu, Yunus Emre Bulum
{"title":"Preoperative patient expectations and postoperative satisfaction following singlelevel unilateral biportal endoscopic lumbar discectomy: Are higher expectations associated with lower satisfaction?","authors":"Yusuf Bayram, Muhammed Enes Karataş, İbrahim Uzunlu, Yunus Emre Bulum","doi":"10.5152/j.aott.2026.25799","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Unilateral biportal endoscopy (UBE) has gained prominence in the surgical treatment of lumbar disc herniation (LDH) because of its minimally invasive profile. How preoperative patient expectations align with postoperative satisfaction after UBE remains insufficiently characterized. The aim was to evaluate the relationship between preoperative expectations and 6-month postoperative satisfaction after single-level UBE discectomy, while also assessing perioperative safety and patient-reported outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective, single-center cohort of consecutive adults undergoing single-level UBE discectomy (September 2022-January 2024) performed by a single surgeon. Preoperative expectations were captured with an 8-item Likert-type survey (scaled 0-100). Outcomes at 6 months included visual analog scale (VAS) (back/leg), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), a single-item satisfaction score (0-100), and patient acceptable symptom state (PASS) derived by anchor-based receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis for ODI; a sensitivity analysis tested the fixed threshold ODI ≤25. Group comparisons used ANOVA/Kruskal-Wallis with Tukey post-hoc as appropriate. Associations were examined using Pearson correlation and restricted multivariable regression models adjusted for clinically prespecified covariates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During the study period, 102 patients were screened; 73 were eligible after exclusions (n = 29). Six-month outcome data were available for 68/73 patients (5 lost to follow-up/incomplete records). The analyzed cohort had a mean age of 44.7 } 9.8 years and 55.9% were male. Perioperative metrics reflected a favorable minimally invasive profile (operative time 96.8 } 11.7 minutes; estimated blood loss 56.3 } 24.1 mL; length of stay 1.8 Å} 0.9 days; complications 5.9%, no reoperations). Pain and disability improved substantially from baseline to 6 months (VAS 7.6 } 1.1 to 1.9 } 0.8; Δ = -5.7 } 1.3; P < .001; ODI 56.3 } 8.7 to 17.5 } 6.1; Δ = -38.8 } 9.2; P < .001). The mean expectation rating score was 76.5 } 14.8 and satisfaction 82.1 } 12.4. Higher preoperative expectations correlated with lower satisfaction (r = -0.37; P = .02). Satisfaction differed across expectation strata (P < .01), with the highest scores in the moderate group and lowest scores in the high group; post-hoc significance was observed for moderate versus high expectations (Tukey, P = .004). Patient acceptable symptom state analysis identified a cohort-specific ODI threshold with high discriminative ability; overall PASS rates were high and did not differ across expectation groups. In multivariable models, higher expectations were independently associated with lower satisfaction but not with change in VAS/ODI or achievement of PASS.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Single-level UBE discectomy yields robust improvements in pain and function with low morbidity. Higher preoperative expectation scores were independently associated with lower postoperative satisfaction, despite comparable clinical gains and PASS attainment. Satisfaction was highest in the moderate-expectation group and lowest in the high-expectation group, with pairwise significance observed only between the moderate- and high-expectation groups. These findings suggest that satisfaction after UBE discectomy is related not only to objective clinical improvement but also to expectation-outcome alignment.   Cite this article as: Bayram Y, Karataş ME, Uzunlu İ, Bulum YE. Preoperative patient expectations and postoperative satisfaction following singlelevel unilateral biportal endoscopic lumbar discectomy: Are higher expectations associated with lower satisfaction?. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc., 2026; 60(4), 0799, doi: 10.5152/j.aott.2026.25799.</p>","PeriodicalId":93854,"journal":{"name":"Acta orthopaedica et traumatologica turcica","volume":"60 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13657336/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta orthopaedica et traumatologica turcica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5152/j.aott.2026.25799","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Unilateral biportal endoscopy (UBE) has gained prominence in the surgical treatment of lumbar disc herniation (LDH) because of its minimally invasive profile. How preoperative patient expectations align with postoperative satisfaction after UBE remains insufficiently characterized. The aim was to evaluate the relationship between preoperative expectations and 6-month postoperative satisfaction after single-level UBE discectomy, while also assessing perioperative safety and patient-reported outcomes.

Methods: Retrospective, single-center cohort of consecutive adults undergoing single-level UBE discectomy (September 2022-January 2024) performed by a single surgeon. Preoperative expectations were captured with an 8-item Likert-type survey (scaled 0-100). Outcomes at 6 months included visual analog scale (VAS) (back/leg), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), a single-item satisfaction score (0-100), and patient acceptable symptom state (PASS) derived by anchor-based receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis for ODI; a sensitivity analysis tested the fixed threshold ODI ≤25. Group comparisons used ANOVA/Kruskal-Wallis with Tukey post-hoc as appropriate. Associations were examined using Pearson correlation and restricted multivariable regression models adjusted for clinically prespecified covariates.

Results: During the study period, 102 patients were screened; 73 were eligible after exclusions (n = 29). Six-month outcome data were available for 68/73 patients (5 lost to follow-up/incomplete records). The analyzed cohort had a mean age of 44.7 } 9.8 years and 55.9% were male. Perioperative metrics reflected a favorable minimally invasive profile (operative time 96.8 } 11.7 minutes; estimated blood loss 56.3 } 24.1 mL; length of stay 1.8 Å} 0.9 days; complications 5.9%, no reoperations). Pain and disability improved substantially from baseline to 6 months (VAS 7.6 } 1.1 to 1.9 } 0.8; Δ = -5.7 } 1.3; P < .001; ODI 56.3 } 8.7 to 17.5 } 6.1; Δ = -38.8 } 9.2; P < .001). The mean expectation rating score was 76.5 } 14.8 and satisfaction 82.1 } 12.4. Higher preoperative expectations correlated with lower satisfaction (r = -0.37; P = .02). Satisfaction differed across expectation strata (P < .01), with the highest scores in the moderate group and lowest scores in the high group; post-hoc significance was observed for moderate versus high expectations (Tukey, P = .004). Patient acceptable symptom state analysis identified a cohort-specific ODI threshold with high discriminative ability; overall PASS rates were high and did not differ across expectation groups. In multivariable models, higher expectations were independently associated with lower satisfaction but not with change in VAS/ODI or achievement of PASS.

Conclusion: Single-level UBE discectomy yields robust improvements in pain and function with low morbidity. Higher preoperative expectation scores were independently associated with lower postoperative satisfaction, despite comparable clinical gains and PASS attainment. Satisfaction was highest in the moderate-expectation group and lowest in the high-expectation group, with pairwise significance observed only between the moderate- and high-expectation groups. These findings suggest that satisfaction after UBE discectomy is related not only to objective clinical improvement but also to expectation-outcome alignment.   Cite this article as: Bayram Y, Karataş ME, Uzunlu İ, Bulum YE. Preoperative patient expectations and postoperative satisfaction following singlelevel unilateral biportal endoscopic lumbar discectomy: Are higher expectations associated with lower satisfaction?. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc., 2026; 60(4), 0799, doi: 10.5152/j.aott.2026.25799.

单节段单侧双门静脉内窥镜腰椎间盘切除术患者术前期望和术后满意度:高期望与低满意度相关吗?
目的:单侧双门静脉内窥镜(UBE)因其微创特点在腰椎间盘突出症(LDH)的手术治疗中得到了突出的应用。术前患者的期望与UBE术后满意度的一致性仍未充分表征。目的是评估术前预期与单节段UBE椎间盘切除术后6个月术后满意度之间的关系,同时评估围手术期安全性和患者报告的结果。方法:回顾性,单中心队列,连续接受单节段UBE椎间盘切除术的成年人(2022年9月至2024年1月),由一名外科医生进行。术前期望通过8项likert型调查(评分0-100)获得。6个月时的结果包括视觉模拟量表(VAS)(背部/腿部)、Oswestry残疾指数(ODI)、单项满意度评分(0-100)和患者可接受的症状状态(PASS),这是通过基于锚定的受试者工作特征(ROC)分析得出的ODI;敏感性分析测试了固定阈值ODI≤25。组间比较采用ANOVA/Kruskal-Wallis,适当时采用Tukey post-hoc。使用Pearson相关性和限制多变量回归模型对临床预先指定的协变量进行校正。结果:研究期间共筛选102例患者;排除后,73例符合条件(n = 29)。73例患者中有68例可获得6个月的结局数据(5例丢失随访/记录不完整)。分析的队列平均年龄为44.7 9.8岁,55.9%为男性。围手术期指标反映了良好的微创特征(手术时间96.8 11.7分钟;估计失血量56.3 24.1 mL;住院时间1.8 Å 0.9天;并发症5.9%,无再手术)。从基线到6个月,疼痛和残疾显著改善(VAS 7.6} 1.1至1.9}0.8;Δ = -5.7} 1.3; P < 0.001; ODI 56.3} 8.7至17.5}6.1;Δ = -38.8} 9.2; P < 0.001)。平均期望评分为76.5}14.8,满意度为82.1}12.4。术前期望值越高,满意度越低(r = -0.37; P = .02)。不同期望层次的满意度差异有统计学意义(P < 0.01),中等期望组满意度最高,高期望组满意度最低;中度期望与高期望的事后显著性比较(P = 0.004)。患者可接受的症状状态分析确定了具有高判别能力的队列特异性ODI阈值;总体通过率很高,并且在期望组之间没有差异。在多变量模型中,较高的期望与较低的满意度独立相关,但与VAS/ODI的变化或PASS的实现无关。结论:单节段UBE椎间盘切除术可显著改善疼痛和功能,且发病率低。较高的术前期望评分与较低的术后满意度独立相关,尽管有相当的临床收益和PASS达到。满意度在中等期望组最高,在高期望组最低,仅在中等和高期望组之间观察到两两显著性。这些发现表明,UBE椎间盘切除术后的满意度不仅与客观临床改善有关,而且与期望-结果相符。引用本文为:Bayram Y, karataku ME, Uzunlu İ, Bulum YE。单节段单侧双门静脉内窥镜腰椎间盘切除术患者术前期望和术后满意度:高期望与低满意度相关吗?骨科创伤学报。, 2026;60(4), 0799, doi: 10.5152/j.aott.2026.25799。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书