Does Pin Removal at Three Versus Five Weeks Influence Clinical Outcomes in Gartland Type III Supracondylar Humerus Fractures? A Comparative Study.

IF 1
Nazan Çevik, Yavuz Akalın, Hünkar Çağdaş Bayrak, Özgür Avcı, Hüseyin Yetkin, Mert Güneş, Alpaslan Öztürk
{"title":"Does Pin Removal at Three Versus Five Weeks Influence Clinical Outcomes in Gartland Type III Supracondylar Humerus Fractures? A Comparative Study.","authors":"Nazan Çevik, Yavuz Akalın, Hünkar Çağdaş Bayrak, Özgür Avcı, Hüseyin Yetkin, Mert Güneş, Alpaslan Öztürk","doi":"10.5152/j.aott.2026.26936","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The optimal timing of pin removal following closed reduction and percutaneous pinning (CRPP) for pediatric Gartland type 3 supracondylar humerus fractures remains controversial. Although pins are commonly removed between the third and fifth postoperative weeks, high-level evidence comparing clinical and radiological outcomes between these time points is limited. This study aimed to evaluate whether pin removal at the third vs. the fifth postoperative week influences radiographic healing or functional outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective observational study included 95 pediatric patients (aged 3-10 years) with Gartland type 3 supracondylar humerus fractures treated with CRPP between 2020 and 2025. Patients were divided into 2 groups based on the timing of pin removal: the third week (n = 42) and the fifth week (n = 53). Clinical outcomes included elbow range of motion (ROM), carrying angle difference, and the Flynn criteria at 3 and 6 months. Radiological outcomes included Baumann angle, anterior humeral line alignment, and the Radiographic Union Score for Tibia scores. Multivariable linear regression was performed to control for potential confounders. Interobserver reliability was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At 3 months, flexion and extension loss were modestly lower in the third-week group (P = .011, r = 0.26 and P = .031, r = 0.22, respectively). However, no significant differences were observed between groups at 6 months in terms of flexion loss, extension loss, total motion loss, carrying angle difference, or Flynn scores (all P > .05). Radiographic Union Score for Tibia scores at the time of pin removal were higher in the fifth-week group (P < .001), reflecting later radiographic assessment; however, no differences were observed at subsequent follow-ups. No cases of loss of reduction, angular deformity, or reoperation occurred in either group. Multivariable analysis demonstrated that pin removal timing was associated with early but not late motion loss.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Pin removal at the third postoperative week did not compromise final radiological outcomes. In contrast, removal at the fifth week did not confer superior long-term functional recovery. Within the commonly practiced third-to-fifth-week interval, timing of pin removal does not appear to influence final clinical outcomes in pediatric Gartland type 3 supracondylar humerus fractures.   Cite this article as: Çevik N, Akalın Y, Bayrak HÇ, et al. Does pin removal timing influence outcomes in Gartland type 3 supracondylar humerus fractures? A comparative study of third- and fifth-week removal. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc., 2026; 60(4), 0936, doi: 10.5152/j.aott.2026.26936.</p>","PeriodicalId":93854,"journal":{"name":"Acta orthopaedica et traumatologica turcica","volume":"60 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13657337/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta orthopaedica et traumatologica turcica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5152/j.aott.2026.26936","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The optimal timing of pin removal following closed reduction and percutaneous pinning (CRPP) for pediatric Gartland type 3 supracondylar humerus fractures remains controversial. Although pins are commonly removed between the third and fifth postoperative weeks, high-level evidence comparing clinical and radiological outcomes between these time points is limited. This study aimed to evaluate whether pin removal at the third vs. the fifth postoperative week influences radiographic healing or functional outcomes.

Methods: This retrospective observational study included 95 pediatric patients (aged 3-10 years) with Gartland type 3 supracondylar humerus fractures treated with CRPP between 2020 and 2025. Patients were divided into 2 groups based on the timing of pin removal: the third week (n = 42) and the fifth week (n = 53). Clinical outcomes included elbow range of motion (ROM), carrying angle difference, and the Flynn criteria at 3 and 6 months. Radiological outcomes included Baumann angle, anterior humeral line alignment, and the Radiographic Union Score for Tibia scores. Multivariable linear regression was performed to control for potential confounders. Interobserver reliability was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients.

Results: At 3 months, flexion and extension loss were modestly lower in the third-week group (P = .011, r = 0.26 and P = .031, r = 0.22, respectively). However, no significant differences were observed between groups at 6 months in terms of flexion loss, extension loss, total motion loss, carrying angle difference, or Flynn scores (all P > .05). Radiographic Union Score for Tibia scores at the time of pin removal were higher in the fifth-week group (P < .001), reflecting later radiographic assessment; however, no differences were observed at subsequent follow-ups. No cases of loss of reduction, angular deformity, or reoperation occurred in either group. Multivariable analysis demonstrated that pin removal timing was associated with early but not late motion loss.

Conclusion: Pin removal at the third postoperative week did not compromise final radiological outcomes. In contrast, removal at the fifth week did not confer superior long-term functional recovery. Within the commonly practiced third-to-fifth-week interval, timing of pin removal does not appear to influence final clinical outcomes in pediatric Gartland type 3 supracondylar humerus fractures.   Cite this article as: Çevik N, Akalın Y, Bayrak HÇ, et al. Does pin removal timing influence outcomes in Gartland type 3 supracondylar humerus fractures? A comparative study of third- and fifth-week removal. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc., 2026; 60(4), 0936, doi: 10.5152/j.aott.2026.26936.

Gartland III型肱骨髁上骨折3周和5周取钉对临床疗效有影响吗?比较研究。
目的:小儿Gartland 3型肱骨髁上骨折闭合复位经皮钉钉(CRPP)后取钉的最佳时机仍有争议。虽然针通常在术后第三周至第五周取出,但比较这些时间点的临床和放射学结果的高水平证据有限。本研究旨在评估术后第三周和第五周取针是否会影响影像学愈合或功能结果。方法:本回顾性观察研究纳入95例儿童(3-10岁)Gartland型3型肱骨髁上骨折,于2020年至2025年期间接受CRPP治疗。根据取针时间将患者分为两组:第3周(n = 42)和第5周(n = 53)。临床结果包括3个月和6个月时肘关节活动度(ROM)、携带角度差和Flynn标准。放射学结果包括鲍曼角、肱骨前线对准和胫骨放射学联合评分。采用多变量线性回归控制潜在混杂因素。使用类内相关系数评估观察者间的信度。结果:3个月时,第三周组屈曲和伸展损失轻微降低(P = 0.011, r = 0.26和P = 0.031, r = 0.22)。然而,在6个月时,各组在屈曲损失、伸展损失、总运动损失、携带角度差或Flynn评分方面没有观察到显著差异(均P < 0.05)。在拔针时,第5周组胫骨的放射学联合评分较高(P < 0.001),反映了后期的放射学评估;然而,在随后的随访中没有观察到差异。两组均无复位丧失、角畸形或再手术病例发生。多变量分析表明,拔针时间与早期运动丧失有关,而与晚期运动丧失无关。结论:术后第三周取针并不影响最终的放射学结果。相比之下,在第5周切除并不能获得更好的长期功能恢复。在通常的第3 - 5周时间间隔内,取钉时间似乎不会影响儿童Gartland 3型肱骨髁上骨折的最终临床结果。引用本文如下:Çevik N, Akalın Y, Bayrak HÇ等。钉取出时间是否影响Gartland型3型肱骨髁上骨折的预后?第三周和第五周切除的比较研究。骨科创伤学报。, 2026;60(4), 0936, doi: 10.5152/j.aott.2026.26936。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书