Brachial Plexus Injury Patterns and Root Graftability: Implications for Reconstruction in 105 Patients.

IF 2.4 2区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Kevin Kuan-I Lee, Tommy Nai-Jen Chang, Yen-Po Lin, David Chwei-Chin Chuang, Johnny Chuieng-Yi Lu
{"title":"Brachial Plexus Injury Patterns and Root Graftability: Implications for Reconstruction in 105 Patients.","authors":"Kevin Kuan-I Lee, Tommy Nai-Jen Chang, Yen-Po Lin, David Chwei-Chin Chuang, Johnny Chuieng-Yi Lu","doi":"10.1016/j.jhsa.2026.08.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Traumatic brachial plexus injuries exhibit diverse patterns with variable reconstructive possibilities. Because the availability of graftable spinal nerves is largely determined by the extent of root injury, understanding the relationship between injury patterns and root graftability may facilitate surgical planning. This study aimed to characterize brachial plexus injury patterns and evaluate their relationship with root graftability.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective review was performed on 105 consecutive brachial plexus injury patients who underwent surgical reconstruction between 2021 and 2024 at a tertiary referral center. Preoperative clinical examination and magnetic resonance neurography were correlated with intraoperative findings to determine injury patterns and root graftability.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 105 patients, 40% presented with panplexus injuries, 42% with upper plexus injuries, and 14% with infraclavicular injuries. The most frequent injury pattern was complete root avulsion from C5-T1 (21%), followed by panplexus with at least one graft-eligible root (19%). The proportion of grafted spinal nerves was 35.8% for C5, 11.5% for C6, and 5.7% for C7. Magnetic resonance neurography (MRN) demonstrated similar rates of potentially graftable C5 in panplexus and upper type injuries (49% vs 36%). Intraoperative exploration confirmed graftability in 28 of 29 C5 roots predicted to be graft-eligible by MRN.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Brachial plexus injury patterns influence root graftability and reconstructive planning. Despite greater severity, panplexus injuries demonstrated comparable rates of graft-eligible C5 roots to upper plexus injuries. These findings support routine exploration and highlight the value of MRN in identifying graftable spinal nerves.</p><p><strong>Type of study/level of evidence: </strong>Diagnostic IV.</p>","PeriodicalId":54815,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hand Surgery-American Volume","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hand Surgery-American Volume","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2026.08.004","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Traumatic brachial plexus injuries exhibit diverse patterns with variable reconstructive possibilities. Because the availability of graftable spinal nerves is largely determined by the extent of root injury, understanding the relationship between injury patterns and root graftability may facilitate surgical planning. This study aimed to characterize brachial plexus injury patterns and evaluate their relationship with root graftability.

Methods: A retrospective review was performed on 105 consecutive brachial plexus injury patients who underwent surgical reconstruction between 2021 and 2024 at a tertiary referral center. Preoperative clinical examination and magnetic resonance neurography were correlated with intraoperative findings to determine injury patterns and root graftability.

Results: Among the 105 patients, 40% presented with panplexus injuries, 42% with upper plexus injuries, and 14% with infraclavicular injuries. The most frequent injury pattern was complete root avulsion from C5-T1 (21%), followed by panplexus with at least one graft-eligible root (19%). The proportion of grafted spinal nerves was 35.8% for C5, 11.5% for C6, and 5.7% for C7. Magnetic resonance neurography (MRN) demonstrated similar rates of potentially graftable C5 in panplexus and upper type injuries (49% vs 36%). Intraoperative exploration confirmed graftability in 28 of 29 C5 roots predicted to be graft-eligible by MRN.

Conclusions: Brachial plexus injury patterns influence root graftability and reconstructive planning. Despite greater severity, panplexus injuries demonstrated comparable rates of graft-eligible C5 roots to upper plexus injuries. These findings support routine exploration and highlight the value of MRN in identifying graftable spinal nerves.

Type of study/level of evidence: Diagnostic IV.

臂丛神经损伤类型和根的可移植性:105例患者重建的意义。
目的:外伤性臂丛神经损伤表现出不同的模式和不同的重建可能性。由于可移植脊神经的可用性在很大程度上取决于根损伤的程度,因此了解损伤模式与根可移植性之间的关系可能有助于手术计划。本研究旨在描述臂丛神经损伤模式,并评估其与神经根可移植性的关系。方法:回顾性分析某三级转诊中心2021 - 2024年间105例连续接受手术重建的臂丛神经损伤患者。术前临床检查和磁共振神经造影与术中发现相关联,以确定损伤模式和根的可移植性。结果:105例患者中,40%为全神经丛损伤,42%为上神经丛损伤,14%为锁骨下损伤。最常见的损伤类型是C5-T1的完全根撕脱(21%),其次是至少有一个适合移植的根的全神经丛(19%)。C5、C6、C7脊髓神经移植比例分别为35.8%、11.5%、5.7%。磁共振神经成像(MRN)显示,在全神经丛和上肢型损伤中,潜在可移植C5的比例相似(49%对36%)。术中探查证实MRN预测29例C5根中有28例可移植。结论:臂丛神经损伤方式影响根的可移植性和重建计划。尽管严重程度更高,但全神经丛损伤的C5根移植率与上神经丛损伤相当。这些发现支持常规探查,并突出了MRN在识别可移植脊神经方面的价值。研究类型/证据水平:诊断IV。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
10.50%
发文量
402
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Hand Surgery publishes original, peer-reviewed articles related to the pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment of diseases and conditions of the upper extremity; these include both clinical and basic science studies, along with case reports. Special features include Review Articles (including Current Concepts and The Hand Surgery Landscape), Reviews of Books and Media, and Letters to the Editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书