How Graduate Programs Develop and Sustain Practicum Sites for Behavioral Health Trainees: A Mixed Methods Study.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Lisa de Saxe Zerden, Danya K Krueger, Maria G Gaiser, Hanna L Erhardt, Brianna M Lombardi
{"title":"How Graduate Programs Develop and Sustain Practicum Sites for Behavioral Health Trainees: A Mixed Methods Study.","authors":"Lisa de Saxe Zerden, Danya K Krueger, Maria G Gaiser, Hanna L Erhardt, Brianna M Lombardi","doi":"10.1007/s11414-026-10023-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Practicum education is a foundational component of master's-level training across social work, counseling, and marriage and family therapy programs. However, expanding and sustaining practicum placements with community partners remains difficult due to rising service demands, high caseloads, and systemic workforce challenges. This explanatory sequential mixed methods study examined practicum site development and supervision supports among a cross-disciplinary sample of accredited U.S. master's-level behavioral health training programs. A cross-sectional survey collected data from 68 practicum education leaders across 31 states and Puerto Rico to describe recruitment strategies and their perceived effectiveness, material incentives, and structural barriers. Semi-structured interviews with 24 practicum education leaders contextualized the quantitative findings and explored the dynamics of academic-community partnerships. The results indicated that programs expand placement capacity primarily through informal, relational strategies, such as alumni outreach, student-initiated proposals, and extending existing partnerships, rather than formalized recruitment infrastructure. Quantitatively, 72% of participating programs reported providing no direct financial or material incentives to either host sites or site supervisors. Qualitative themes showed that placement capacity is fundamentally relational and relies heavily on uncompensated, time-intensive labor from both academic staff and community partners. The most salient barriers to expanding capacity included a lack of available agency-based supervisors, supervisor time constraints, and bureaucratic hurdles such as legal and insurance compliance. This study suggests that continued reliance on professional goodwill and uncompensated supervisory labor may be difficult to sustain, underscoring the need for greater structural investment in practicum infrastructure.</p>","PeriodicalId":49040,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11414-026-10023-5","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Practicum education is a foundational component of master's-level training across social work, counseling, and marriage and family therapy programs. However, expanding and sustaining practicum placements with community partners remains difficult due to rising service demands, high caseloads, and systemic workforce challenges. This explanatory sequential mixed methods study examined practicum site development and supervision supports among a cross-disciplinary sample of accredited U.S. master's-level behavioral health training programs. A cross-sectional survey collected data from 68 practicum education leaders across 31 states and Puerto Rico to describe recruitment strategies and their perceived effectiveness, material incentives, and structural barriers. Semi-structured interviews with 24 practicum education leaders contextualized the quantitative findings and explored the dynamics of academic-community partnerships. The results indicated that programs expand placement capacity primarily through informal, relational strategies, such as alumni outreach, student-initiated proposals, and extending existing partnerships, rather than formalized recruitment infrastructure. Quantitatively, 72% of participating programs reported providing no direct financial or material incentives to either host sites or site supervisors. Qualitative themes showed that placement capacity is fundamentally relational and relies heavily on uncompensated, time-intensive labor from both academic staff and community partners. The most salient barriers to expanding capacity included a lack of available agency-based supervisors, supervisor time constraints, and bureaucratic hurdles such as legal and insurance compliance. This study suggests that continued reliance on professional goodwill and uncompensated supervisory labor may be difficult to sustain, underscoring the need for greater structural investment in practicum infrastructure.

研究生课程如何为行为健康受训者发展和维持实习场所:一项混合方法研究。
实习教育是跨社会工作、咨询、婚姻和家庭治疗项目的硕士水平培训的基础组成部分。然而,由于不断增长的服务需求、高工作量和系统性的劳动力挑战,扩大和维持与社区合作伙伴的实习机会仍然很困难。本解释性顺序混合方法研究考察了美国认可的硕士级行为健康培训项目的跨学科样本中实习场所的发展和监督支持。一项横断面调查收集了来自31个州和波多黎各的68名实习教育领导者的数据,以描述招聘策略及其感知有效性、物质激励和结构障碍。对24位实习教育领导者进行了半结构化访谈,将定量研究结果置于背景下,并探讨了学术界与社区伙伴关系的动态。结果表明,这些项目主要通过非正式的关系策略来扩大就业能力,如校友拓展、学生发起的提案和扩大现有的合作伙伴关系,而不是通过正式的招聘基础设施。从数量上讲,72%的参与项目报告没有向主办地点或地点主管提供直接的财政或物质奖励。定性主题表明,安置能力在根本上是相互关联的,并且严重依赖于学术人员和社区合作伙伴的无偿、时间密集型劳动。扩大能力的最突出障碍包括缺乏可用的基于机构的监督者、监督者的时间限制以及诸如法律和保险合规等官僚主义障碍。这项研究表明,继续依赖专业善意和无偿监督劳动可能难以维持,强调需要在实习基础设施方面进行更大的结构性投资。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research
Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
5.30%
发文量
51
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: This journal examines the organization, financing, delivery and outcomes of behavioral health services (i.e., alcohol, drug abuse, and mental disorders), providing practical and empirical contributions to and explaining the implications for the broader behavioral health field. Each issue includes an overview of contemporary concerns and recent developments in behavioral health policy and management through research articles, policy perspectives, commentaries, brief reports, and book reviews. This journal is the official publication of the National Council for Behavioral Health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书