Pilot Testing the Johns Hopkins Early Discharge Planning Calculator.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Daniel L Young, Rebecca Engels, Elizabeth Colantuoni, Erik H Hoyer
{"title":"Pilot Testing the Johns Hopkins Early Discharge Planning Calculator.","authors":"Daniel L Young, Rebecca Engels, Elizabeth Colantuoni, Erik H Hoyer","doi":"10.37765/ajmc.2026.90008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To validate the Johns Hopkins Early Discharge Planning Calculator (JH-EDPC) machine learning algorithm in routine clinical practice for predicting postacute care (PAC) needs and evaluate whether knowledge of predictions influenced physical therapy (PT) consultation rates.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Pilot controlled clinical validation study conducted from October 2022 to March 2023.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The JH-EDPC mobile app was deployed to 7 hospitalists (intervention group patients, n = 51 adult inpatients hospitalized ≥ 48 hours); hospitalists on the same units served as controls (patients, n = 111). Predictors included age, admission date, living status, surgery, and daily Activity Measure for Post Acute Care (AM-PAC) mobility scores. Accuracy metrics (area under curve [AUC], sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value [NPV]) were calculated at a PAC probability cutoff of 0.25 using lowest 48-hour AM-PAC scores. Day-7 PT consultation rates were compared using inverse probability of treatment weighting.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 11.7% of patients required PAC. The JH-EDPC correctly predicted discharge location for 85% of patients (AUC = 0.77), demonstrating 68% sensitivity, 87% specificity, and a high NPV of 95.4%. Adjusted day-7 PT consultation rates were 38% for intervention vs 35% for controls. Among patients predicted for home discharge, intervention patients received fewer PT consultations (19% vs 23%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The JH-EDPC successfully integrated into clinical workflows with high specificity and NPV to rule out PAC needs. Findings suggest potential for optimizing hospital resource allocation by directing rehabilitation consultations to patients with the highest need.</p>","PeriodicalId":50808,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Managed Care","volume":"32 9","pages":"e306-e308"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Managed Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37765/ajmc.2026.90008","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To validate the Johns Hopkins Early Discharge Planning Calculator (JH-EDPC) machine learning algorithm in routine clinical practice for predicting postacute care (PAC) needs and evaluate whether knowledge of predictions influenced physical therapy (PT) consultation rates.

Study design: Pilot controlled clinical validation study conducted from October 2022 to March 2023.

Methods: The JH-EDPC mobile app was deployed to 7 hospitalists (intervention group patients, n = 51 adult inpatients hospitalized ≥ 48 hours); hospitalists on the same units served as controls (patients, n = 111). Predictors included age, admission date, living status, surgery, and daily Activity Measure for Post Acute Care (AM-PAC) mobility scores. Accuracy metrics (area under curve [AUC], sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value [NPV]) were calculated at a PAC probability cutoff of 0.25 using lowest 48-hour AM-PAC scores. Day-7 PT consultation rates were compared using inverse probability of treatment weighting.

Results: Overall, 11.7% of patients required PAC. The JH-EDPC correctly predicted discharge location for 85% of patients (AUC = 0.77), demonstrating 68% sensitivity, 87% specificity, and a high NPV of 95.4%. Adjusted day-7 PT consultation rates were 38% for intervention vs 35% for controls. Among patients predicted for home discharge, intervention patients received fewer PT consultations (19% vs 23%).

Conclusions: The JH-EDPC successfully integrated into clinical workflows with high specificity and NPV to rule out PAC needs. Findings suggest potential for optimizing hospital resource allocation by directing rehabilitation consultations to patients with the highest need.

试点测试约翰霍普金斯早期出院计划计算器。
目的:验证约翰霍普金斯早期出院计划计算器(JH-EDPC)机器学习算法在常规临床实践中预测急性后护理(PAC)需求,并评估预测知识是否影响物理治疗(PT)咨询率。研究设计:2022年10月至2023年3月进行的试点对照临床验证研究。方法:对7名住院医师(干预组患者,n = 51名住院≥48小时的成年患者)部署JH-EDPC移动应用程序;同一单位的医院医生作为对照(患者,n = 111)。预测指标包括年龄、入院日期、生活状况、手术情况和急性期护理后每日活动测量(AM-PAC)活动能力评分。使用最低48小时AM-PAC评分,以0.25的PAC概率截止值计算准确性指标(曲线下面积[AUC]、敏感性、特异性、阴性预测值[NPV])。使用治疗加权逆概率比较第7天PT咨询率。结果:总体而言,11.7%的患者需要PAC。JH-EDPC正确预测85%患者的出院位置(AUC = 0.77),具有68%的敏感性,87%的特异性和95.4%的高NPV。干预组调整后的第7天PT咨询率为38%,对照组为35%。在预计出院的患者中,干预患者接受的PT咨询较少(19%对23%)。结论:JH-EDPC成功融入临床工作流程,具有高特异性和NPV,可排除PAC需求。研究结果表明,通过将康复咨询指导给最需要的患者,可以优化医院资源配置。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American Journal of Managed Care
American Journal of Managed Care 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
177
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Managed Care is an independent, peer-reviewed publication dedicated to disseminating clinical information to managed care physicians, clinical decision makers, and other healthcare professionals. Its aim is to stimulate scientific communication in the ever-evolving field of managed care. The American Journal of Managed Care addresses a broad range of issues relevant to clinical decision making in a cost-constrained environment and examines the impact of clinical, management, and policy interventions and programs on healthcare and economic outcomes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书