Daniel L Young, Rebecca Engels, Elizabeth Colantuoni, Erik H Hoyer
{"title":"Pilot Testing the Johns Hopkins Early Discharge Planning Calculator.","authors":"Daniel L Young, Rebecca Engels, Elizabeth Colantuoni, Erik H Hoyer","doi":"10.37765/ajmc.2026.90008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To validate the Johns Hopkins Early Discharge Planning Calculator (JH-EDPC) machine learning algorithm in routine clinical practice for predicting postacute care (PAC) needs and evaluate whether knowledge of predictions influenced physical therapy (PT) consultation rates.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Pilot controlled clinical validation study conducted from October 2022 to March 2023.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The JH-EDPC mobile app was deployed to 7 hospitalists (intervention group patients, n = 51 adult inpatients hospitalized ≥ 48 hours); hospitalists on the same units served as controls (patients, n = 111). Predictors included age, admission date, living status, surgery, and daily Activity Measure for Post Acute Care (AM-PAC) mobility scores. Accuracy metrics (area under curve [AUC], sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value [NPV]) were calculated at a PAC probability cutoff of 0.25 using lowest 48-hour AM-PAC scores. Day-7 PT consultation rates were compared using inverse probability of treatment weighting.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 11.7% of patients required PAC. The JH-EDPC correctly predicted discharge location for 85% of patients (AUC = 0.77), demonstrating 68% sensitivity, 87% specificity, and a high NPV of 95.4%. Adjusted day-7 PT consultation rates were 38% for intervention vs 35% for controls. Among patients predicted for home discharge, intervention patients received fewer PT consultations (19% vs 23%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The JH-EDPC successfully integrated into clinical workflows with high specificity and NPV to rule out PAC needs. Findings suggest potential for optimizing hospital resource allocation by directing rehabilitation consultations to patients with the highest need.</p>","PeriodicalId":50808,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Managed Care","volume":"32 9","pages":"e306-e308"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Managed Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37765/ajmc.2026.90008","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: To validate the Johns Hopkins Early Discharge Planning Calculator (JH-EDPC) machine learning algorithm in routine clinical practice for predicting postacute care (PAC) needs and evaluate whether knowledge of predictions influenced physical therapy (PT) consultation rates.
Study design: Pilot controlled clinical validation study conducted from October 2022 to March 2023.
Methods: The JH-EDPC mobile app was deployed to 7 hospitalists (intervention group patients, n = 51 adult inpatients hospitalized ≥ 48 hours); hospitalists on the same units served as controls (patients, n = 111). Predictors included age, admission date, living status, surgery, and daily Activity Measure for Post Acute Care (AM-PAC) mobility scores. Accuracy metrics (area under curve [AUC], sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value [NPV]) were calculated at a PAC probability cutoff of 0.25 using lowest 48-hour AM-PAC scores. Day-7 PT consultation rates were compared using inverse probability of treatment weighting.
Results: Overall, 11.7% of patients required PAC. The JH-EDPC correctly predicted discharge location for 85% of patients (AUC = 0.77), demonstrating 68% sensitivity, 87% specificity, and a high NPV of 95.4%. Adjusted day-7 PT consultation rates were 38% for intervention vs 35% for controls. Among patients predicted for home discharge, intervention patients received fewer PT consultations (19% vs 23%).
Conclusions: The JH-EDPC successfully integrated into clinical workflows with high specificity and NPV to rule out PAC needs. Findings suggest potential for optimizing hospital resource allocation by directing rehabilitation consultations to patients with the highest need.
期刊介绍:
The American Journal of Managed Care is an independent, peer-reviewed publication dedicated to disseminating clinical information to managed care physicians, clinical decision makers, and other healthcare professionals. Its aim is to stimulate scientific communication in the ever-evolving field of managed care. The American Journal of Managed Care addresses a broad range of issues relevant to clinical decision making in a cost-constrained environment and examines the impact of clinical, management, and policy interventions and programs on healthcare and economic outcomes.