Psychometric Properties of the Four Square Step Test in Incomplete Spinal Cord Injury.

IF 1.4 Q1 REHABILITATION
Topics in Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation Pub Date : 2026-01-01 Epub Date: 2026-09-28 DOI:10.46292/sci25-00141
Jennifer H Kahn, Kadi Glaser, Katherine Kyburz, Kylee Mosehart, Jane L Woodward, Keith E Gordon
{"title":"Psychometric Properties of the Four Square Step Test in Incomplete Spinal Cord Injury.","authors":"Jennifer H Kahn, Kadi Glaser, Katherine Kyburz, Kylee Mosehart, Jane L Woodward, Keith E Gordon","doi":"10.46292/sci25-00141","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Clinicians require reliable and valid measures to assess dynamic balance and fall risk in individuals with incomplete spinal cord injury (iSCI). Currently, no psychometrically sound measures exist for capturing higher-level balance impairments in this population. The Four Square Step Test (FSST) is a dynamic balance measure assessing a person's ability to step quickly in multiple directions over obstacles. The FSST has been established as reliable and valid for various neurological populations and is particularly suited for individuals who ambulate without assistance.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the validity and interrater reliability of the FSST in an ambulatory, chronic iSCI population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used data from 23 participants to assess FSST convergent validity with established gait and balance measures. We used data from 11 participants, each assessed by multiple raters, to evaluate interrater reliability.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Spearman's rank correlations (ρ) revealed strong, significant correlations (all <i>P</i>s < .01) between the FSST and the Berg Balance Scale (ρ = -0.81), 10-Meter Walk Test self-selected (ρ = -0.77), 10-Meter Walk Test fast (ρ = -0.84), and Timed Up and Go (ρ = 0.81), indicating convergent validity. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) between expert and novice raters was excellent (ICC = 1.0), confirming interrater reliability.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Overall, the FSST demonstrated excellent reliability and validity, suggesting it is suitable for evaluating dynamic balance in high-functioning individuals with iSCI.</p>","PeriodicalId":46769,"journal":{"name":"Topics in Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation","volume":"32 4","pages":"56-62"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13621285/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Topics in Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46292/sci25-00141","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/9/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Clinicians require reliable and valid measures to assess dynamic balance and fall risk in individuals with incomplete spinal cord injury (iSCI). Currently, no psychometrically sound measures exist for capturing higher-level balance impairments in this population. The Four Square Step Test (FSST) is a dynamic balance measure assessing a person's ability to step quickly in multiple directions over obstacles. The FSST has been established as reliable and valid for various neurological populations and is particularly suited for individuals who ambulate without assistance.

Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the validity and interrater reliability of the FSST in an ambulatory, chronic iSCI population.

Methods: We used data from 23 participants to assess FSST convergent validity with established gait and balance measures. We used data from 11 participants, each assessed by multiple raters, to evaluate interrater reliability.

Results: Spearman's rank correlations (ρ) revealed strong, significant correlations (all Ps < .01) between the FSST and the Berg Balance Scale (ρ = -0.81), 10-Meter Walk Test self-selected (ρ = -0.77), 10-Meter Walk Test fast (ρ = -0.84), and Timed Up and Go (ρ = 0.81), indicating convergent validity. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) between expert and novice raters was excellent (ICC = 1.0), confirming interrater reliability.

Conclusion: Overall, the FSST demonstrated excellent reliability and validity, suggesting it is suitable for evaluating dynamic balance in high-functioning individuals with iSCI.

不完全性脊髓损伤四方步试验的心理测量特性。
背景:临床医生需要可靠有效的措施来评估不完全性脊髓损伤(iSCI)患者的动态平衡和跌倒风险。目前,在这一人群中,没有心理测量学上有效的测量方法来捕捉更高水平的平衡障碍。四方步测试(FSST)是一种动态平衡测试,评估一个人在多个方向快速跨越障碍的能力。FSST已被确定为可靠和有效的各种神经人群,特别适用于没有帮助的行走的个人。目的:本研究旨在评估FSST在流动慢性iSCI人群中的有效性和互译信度。方法:我们使用来自23名参与者的数据来评估FSST在既定步态和平衡测量方面的收敛效度。我们使用了来自11名参与者的数据,每个参与者都由多个评价者评估,以评估评价者之间的可靠性。结果:Spearman秩相关(ρ)显示,FSST与Berg平衡量表(ρ = -0.81)、10米步行测试自选(ρ = -0.77)、10米步行测试快速(ρ = -0.84)、Timed Up and Go (ρ = 0.81)之间存在显著相关性(均p < 0.01),表明趋同效度。专家评分者与新手评分者的类内相关系数(ICC)为优秀(ICC = 1.0),证实了类间信度。结论:总体而言,FSST表现出良好的信度和效度,表明FSST适用于评估高功能iSCI患者的动态平衡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
3.40%
发文量
33
期刊介绍: Now in our 22nd year as the leading interdisciplinary journal of SCI rehabilitation techniques and care. TSCIR is peer-reviewed, practical, and features one key topic per issue. Published topics include: mobility, sexuality, genitourinary, functional assessment, skin care, psychosocial, high tetraplegia, physical activity, pediatric, FES, sci/tbi, electronic medicine, orthotics, secondary conditions, research, aging, legal issues, women & sci, pain, environmental effects, life care planning
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书