Prevalence and associated factors of single pill combination therapy among people with hypertension in a tertiary hospital.

Q3 Medicine
Medical Journal of Malaysia Pub Date : 2026-09-01
N K Devaraj, T Chandrabose, V Manimaran, M I Nor Azwadi, N A A Ahmad Fadzlee, T R Tajudin, Z A Parpia
{"title":"Prevalence and associated factors of single pill combination therapy among people with hypertension in a tertiary hospital.","authors":"N K Devaraj, T Chandrabose, V Manimaran, M I Nor Azwadi, N A A Ahmad Fadzlee, T R Tajudin, Z A Parpia","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Effective management of hypertension often requires pharmacological intervention, which can involve either single pill combination therapy (SPC) or multiple pill combination therapy (MPC). However, the choice between SPC and MPC can be influenced by patient demographics, clinical characteristics, comorbid conditions and physician preferences. This study was aimed at exploring the prevalence of SPC versus MPC usage among people with hypertension in a tertiary hospital and its associated factors.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A cross-sectional study using a validated questionnaire was conducted among the hypertensive patients aged 18 years and on antihypertensive medication(s) for at least six months attending various speciality clinics at Hospital Sultan Abdul Aziz Shah, Selangor.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The prevalence of patients using SPC was 27.9% (78/280). In univariate analysis, factors that were found to be associated with the use of SPC were presence of diabetes mellitus (p < 0.001), presence of chronic kidney disease (p = 0.033), physician's own preference for SPC (p = 0.027) and duration of hypertension (p = 0.003). The independent factors associated with SPC use was the presence of chronic kidney disease, physician's own preference for SPC and absence of diabetes mellitus (p < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The use of SPC is only 27.9%. The independent factors associated with SPC use was the presence of chronic kidney disease, physician's own preference for SPC and absence of diabetes mellitus. Hence, this study's findings can be applied by healthcare providers who should consider these factors when prescribing hypertension treatments. Tailoring the treatment plan to the individual patient's needs and circumstances can enhance adherence and efficacy.</p>","PeriodicalId":39388,"journal":{"name":"Medical Journal of Malaysia","volume":"81 5","pages":"677-684"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Journal of Malaysia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Effective management of hypertension often requires pharmacological intervention, which can involve either single pill combination therapy (SPC) or multiple pill combination therapy (MPC). However, the choice between SPC and MPC can be influenced by patient demographics, clinical characteristics, comorbid conditions and physician preferences. This study was aimed at exploring the prevalence of SPC versus MPC usage among people with hypertension in a tertiary hospital and its associated factors.

Materials and methods: A cross-sectional study using a validated questionnaire was conducted among the hypertensive patients aged 18 years and on antihypertensive medication(s) for at least six months attending various speciality clinics at Hospital Sultan Abdul Aziz Shah, Selangor.

Results: The prevalence of patients using SPC was 27.9% (78/280). In univariate analysis, factors that were found to be associated with the use of SPC were presence of diabetes mellitus (p < 0.001), presence of chronic kidney disease (p = 0.033), physician's own preference for SPC (p = 0.027) and duration of hypertension (p = 0.003). The independent factors associated with SPC use was the presence of chronic kidney disease, physician's own preference for SPC and absence of diabetes mellitus (p < 0.05).

Conclusion: The use of SPC is only 27.9%. The independent factors associated with SPC use was the presence of chronic kidney disease, physician's own preference for SPC and absence of diabetes mellitus. Hence, this study's findings can be applied by healthcare providers who should consider these factors when prescribing hypertension treatments. Tailoring the treatment plan to the individual patient's needs and circumstances can enhance adherence and efficacy.

某三级医院高血压患者单药联合治疗的患病率及相关因素分析
有效的高血压管理往往需要药物干预,这可能包括单丸联合治疗(SPC)或多丸联合治疗(MPC)。然而,在SPC和MPC之间的选择可能受到患者人口统计学、临床特征、合并症和医生偏好的影响。本研究旨在探讨三级医院高血压患者中SPC与MPC的使用情况及其相关因素。材料和方法:在雪兰莪州苏丹阿卜杜勒阿齐兹沙医院各专科诊所接受降压药治疗至少6个月的18岁高血压患者中进行了一项使用有效问卷的横断面研究。结果:使用SPC的患者占27.9%(78/280)。在单因素分析中,发现与SPC使用相关的因素是糖尿病(p < 0.001)、慢性肾脏疾病(p = 0.033)、医生自身对SPC的偏好(p = 0.027)和高血压病程(p = 0.003)。与使用SPC相关的独立因素是存在慢性肾脏疾病、医生自己偏爱SPC和无糖尿病(p < 0.05)。结论:SPC的使用率仅为27.9%。与使用SPC相关的独立因素是存在慢性肾脏疾病,医生自己偏爱SPC和没有糖尿病。因此,这项研究的发现可以应用于医疗保健提供者在开高血压治疗处方时应考虑这些因素。根据个别患者的需要和情况量身定制治疗计划可以提高依从性和疗效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Medical Journal of Malaysia
Medical Journal of Malaysia Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
165
期刊介绍: Published since 1890 this journal originated as the Journal of the Straits Medical Association. With the formation of the Malaysian Medical Association (MMA), the Journal became the official organ, supervised by an editorial board. Some of the early Hon. Editors were Mr. H.M. McGladdery (1960 - 1964), Dr. A.A. Sandosham (1965 - 1977), Prof. Paul C.Y. Chen (1977 - 1987). It is a scientific journal, published quarterly and can be found in medical libraries in many parts of the world. The Journal also enjoys the status of being listed in the Index Medicus, the internationally accepted reference index of medical journals. The editorial columns often reflect the Association''s views and attitudes towards medical problems in the country. The MJM aims to be a peer reviewed scientific journal of the highest quality. We want to ensure that whatever data is published is true and any opinion expressed important to medical science. We believe being Malaysian is our unique niche; our priority will be for scientific knowledge about diseases found in Malaysia and for the practice of medicine in Malaysia. The MJM will archive knowledge about the changing pattern of human diseases and our endeavours to overcome them. It will also document how medicine develops as a profession in the nation. We will communicate and co-operate with other scientific journals in Malaysia. We seek articles that are of educational value to doctors. We will consider all unsolicited articles submitted to the journal and will commission distinguished Malaysians to write relevant review articles. We want to help doctors make better decisions and be good at judging the value of scientific data. We want to help doctors write better, to be articulate and precise.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书