Challenges and possibilities of public and patient involvement for early-career researchers: pedagogy, practice and data governance.

IF 4.1 Q1 Social Sciences
Adam Daly, Arthur Templeman-Lilley, Isobel Walsh, Alex Neuroth, Kate Molloy, Veronica Lambert
{"title":"Challenges and possibilities of public and patient involvement for early-career researchers: pedagogy, practice and data governance.","authors":"Adam Daly, Arthur Templeman-Lilley, Isobel Walsh, Alex Neuroth, Kate Molloy, Veronica Lambert","doi":"10.1186/s40900-026-00979-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Early-career researchers face unique challenges in implementing effective and meaningful public and patient involvement (PPI) in their research. These barriers prevent early-career researchers from accessing the full benefits of effective PPI and often leads to tokenistic inclusion, which disempowers public and patient contributors. Therefore, there is a critical need to explore the possibilities of how to better support early-career researchers in achieving effective involvement of the public and/or patients.</p><p><strong>Main body: </strong>Pedagogy, practice, and data governance represent three areas of PPI that present both challenges and possible opportunities to support early-career researchers. Regarding pedagogy, PPI requires deeper integration into research education as a tool which can be utilised to enhance research across disciplines. Moreover, curriculum development and delivery must align with the tenets of the field by actively involving public and patient contributors as co-educators. Regarding practice, early-career researchers often struggle with limited resources and the difficulty of reaching diverse populations who may not benefit from traditional involvement techniques. Creative involvement strategies offer an opportunity to expand early-career researchers' repertoire of techniques to better empower contributors. Finally, data governance is an increasingly complex yet critical consideration in PPI. Early career researchers can feel ill-equipped to navigate these complexities alongside PPI contributors. We suggest a new framework to support early-career researchers in navigating this process with PPI contributors to ensure equitable and safe data governance.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Public and patient involvement poses many challenges to early-career researchers. However, addressing these difficulties within pedagogy, practice and data governance provides possibilities for better supporting researchers in collaborating meaningfully with PPI contributors to produce more rigorous and impactful research.</p>","PeriodicalId":36999,"journal":{"name":"Research Involvement and Engagement","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13621467/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research Involvement and Engagement","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40900-026-00979-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Early-career researchers face unique challenges in implementing effective and meaningful public and patient involvement (PPI) in their research. These barriers prevent early-career researchers from accessing the full benefits of effective PPI and often leads to tokenistic inclusion, which disempowers public and patient contributors. Therefore, there is a critical need to explore the possibilities of how to better support early-career researchers in achieving effective involvement of the public and/or patients.

Main body: Pedagogy, practice, and data governance represent three areas of PPI that present both challenges and possible opportunities to support early-career researchers. Regarding pedagogy, PPI requires deeper integration into research education as a tool which can be utilised to enhance research across disciplines. Moreover, curriculum development and delivery must align with the tenets of the field by actively involving public and patient contributors as co-educators. Regarding practice, early-career researchers often struggle with limited resources and the difficulty of reaching diverse populations who may not benefit from traditional involvement techniques. Creative involvement strategies offer an opportunity to expand early-career researchers' repertoire of techniques to better empower contributors. Finally, data governance is an increasingly complex yet critical consideration in PPI. Early career researchers can feel ill-equipped to navigate these complexities alongside PPI contributors. We suggest a new framework to support early-career researchers in navigating this process with PPI contributors to ensure equitable and safe data governance.

Conclusion: Public and patient involvement poses many challenges to early-career researchers. However, addressing these difficulties within pedagogy, practice and data governance provides possibilities for better supporting researchers in collaborating meaningfully with PPI contributors to produce more rigorous and impactful research.

早期职业研究人员公众和患者参与的挑战和可能性:教学法、实践和数据治理。
背景:早期职业研究人员面临着在他们的研究中实施有效和有意义的公众和患者参与(PPI)的独特挑战。这些障碍阻碍了早期职业研究人员获得有效PPI的全部好处,并经常导致象征性的纳入,从而剥夺了公众和患者贡献者的权利。因此,迫切需要探索如何更好地支持早期职业研究人员实现公众和/或患者有效参与的可能性。正文:教学、实践和数据治理代表了PPI的三个领域,这三个领域为早期职业研究人员提供了挑战和可能的机会。在教学法方面,个人能力指数需要更深入地融入研究性教育,作为一种工具,可以用来加强跨学科的研究。此外,课程开发和交付必须与该领域的原则保持一致,积极让公众和耐心的贡献者作为共同教育者参与进来。在实践方面,早期职业研究人员经常与有限的资源和难以接触到不同人群的困难作斗争,这些人群可能无法从传统的参与技术中受益。创造性参与策略提供了一个机会,可以扩展早期职业研究人员的技术储备,从而更好地赋予贡献者权力。最后,数据治理是PPI中一个日益复杂但又至关重要的考虑因素。早期职业研究人员可能觉得自己没有能力与PPI贡献者一起应对这些复杂性。我们建议建立一个新的框架,以支持早期职业研究人员与PPI贡献者一起引导这一过程,以确保公平和安全的数据治理。结论:公众和患者的参与对早期职业研究人员提出了许多挑战。然而,在教学法、实践和数据治理中解决这些困难,可以更好地支持研究人员与PPI贡献者进行有意义的合作,从而产生更严格、更有影响力的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Research Involvement and Engagement
Research Involvement and Engagement Social Sciences-Health (social science)
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
60
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书