Hongmei Liu, Yuanyuan Zhao, Meiqun Yu, Yuan Zhang, Feifei Zhang, Yang Zhang, Ya Liu, Qian Song, Ran Zhang, Yuan Du, Minghao Liu, Jinwei Zhai, Yang Yang, Xiuchun Yang, Aihua Lian, Pingzhen Li, Yang Tang, Lei Wang, Qiang Zhang, Zhu Zhu, Xiaoyan Feng, Kai Zou, Shuilian Wang, Juan Xu, Jing Zhao, Jidong Guo, Yihui Han, Jingtao Li, Caixia Zhang, Yueyue Yuan, Wenjuan Wu, Jiangwen Liu, Xiongwei He, Lijian Gao
{"title":"IBP-DISTAL protocol: distal vs radial access for invasive BP in critical care.","authors":"Hongmei Liu, Yuanyuan Zhao, Meiqun Yu, Yuan Zhang, Feifei Zhang, Yang Zhang, Ya Liu, Qian Song, Ran Zhang, Yuan Du, Minghao Liu, Jinwei Zhai, Yang Yang, Xiuchun Yang, Aihua Lian, Pingzhen Li, Yang Tang, Lei Wang, Qiang Zhang, Zhu Zhu, Xiaoyan Feng, Kai Zou, Shuilian Wang, Juan Xu, Jing Zhao, Jidong Guo, Yihui Han, Jingtao Li, Caixia Zhang, Yueyue Yuan, Wenjuan Wu, Jiangwen Liu, Xiongwei He, Lijian Gao","doi":"10.1186/s13063-026-09962-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>To determine whether distal radial artery (dTRA) cannulation is non-inferior to conventional radial artery (TRA) cannulation for first-pass success and subsequent safety and accuracy of invasive blood pressure monitoring in awake, critically ill adults.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Prospective, multicenter, randomized, open-label, parallel-group, non-inferiority trial.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study will be conducted in three tertiary hospitals in northwestern China. Eligible patients (≥ 18 years old) requiring invasive arterial pressure monitoring, with palpable distal and proximal radial pulses and a negative modified Allen test, will be centrally randomized (1:1; stratified by previous ipsilateral intervention) to dTRA or TRA. Both groups will undergo blind puncture with a uniform 20 G catheter-over-needle system; ultrasound is reserved for rescue. Pre-procedure ultrasound maps vessel diameter, intima-media thickness and flow velocity.</p><p><strong>Primary endpoint: </strong>one-time success rate of catheterization. Secondary endpoints: total cannulation time, crossover rate, 24 h and 30-day radial artery occlusion (RAO) by Doppler, local complications (EASY hematoma grade), BARC major bleeding (types 2, 3, 5), accidental dislodgment, pain (VAS 0-10), functional score (Barthel Index), and major adverse cardiovascular/cerebrovascular events during ICU stay. Target enrollment 204 (102 per arm) gives 85% power to demonstrate non-inferiority at one-sided α = 0.025, allowing 20% failure rate. All ultrasound assessments are performed by technicians blinded to allocation.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This nurse-led protocol reflects real-world Chinese practice (blind puncture, no ultrasound routine) while standardizing compression (≥ 5 min) and post-procedural care across centers. Results will clarify whether dTRA offers shorter hemostasis time, lower RAO and better comfort without compromising hemodynamic monitoring fidelity.</p><p><strong>Impact: </strong>If non-inferiority is confirmed, dTRA could become the preferred default access for invasive blood pressure monitoring in critical care, preserving future radial conduit and improving patient experience.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>This study has been registered on Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR.org.cn) under the identifier ChiCTR2500101331 (Apr 23, 2025).</p>","PeriodicalId":23333,"journal":{"name":"Trials","volume":"27 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13625380/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-026-09962-3","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Aims: To determine whether distal radial artery (dTRA) cannulation is non-inferior to conventional radial artery (TRA) cannulation for first-pass success and subsequent safety and accuracy of invasive blood pressure monitoring in awake, critically ill adults.
Methods: The study will be conducted in three tertiary hospitals in northwestern China. Eligible patients (≥ 18 years old) requiring invasive arterial pressure monitoring, with palpable distal and proximal radial pulses and a negative modified Allen test, will be centrally randomized (1:1; stratified by previous ipsilateral intervention) to dTRA or TRA. Both groups will undergo blind puncture with a uniform 20 G catheter-over-needle system; ultrasound is reserved for rescue. Pre-procedure ultrasound maps vessel diameter, intima-media thickness and flow velocity.
Primary endpoint: one-time success rate of catheterization. Secondary endpoints: total cannulation time, crossover rate, 24 h and 30-day radial artery occlusion (RAO) by Doppler, local complications (EASY hematoma grade), BARC major bleeding (types 2, 3, 5), accidental dislodgment, pain (VAS 0-10), functional score (Barthel Index), and major adverse cardiovascular/cerebrovascular events during ICU stay. Target enrollment 204 (102 per arm) gives 85% power to demonstrate non-inferiority at one-sided α = 0.025, allowing 20% failure rate. All ultrasound assessments are performed by technicians blinded to allocation.
Discussion: This nurse-led protocol reflects real-world Chinese practice (blind puncture, no ultrasound routine) while standardizing compression (≥ 5 min) and post-procedural care across centers. Results will clarify whether dTRA offers shorter hemostasis time, lower RAO and better comfort without compromising hemodynamic monitoring fidelity.
Impact: If non-inferiority is confirmed, dTRA could become the preferred default access for invasive blood pressure monitoring in critical care, preserving future radial conduit and improving patient experience.
Trial registration: This study has been registered on Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR.org.cn) under the identifier ChiCTR2500101331 (Apr 23, 2025).
期刊介绍:
Trials is an open access, peer-reviewed, online journal that will encompass all aspects of the performance and findings of randomized controlled trials. Trials will experiment with, and then refine, innovative approaches to improving communication about trials. We are keen to move beyond publishing traditional trial results articles (although these will be included). We believe this represents an exciting opportunity to advance the science and reporting of trials. Prior to 2006, Trials was published as Current Controlled Trials in Cardiovascular Medicine (CCTCVM). All published CCTCVM articles are available via the Trials website and citations to CCTCVM article URLs will continue to be supported.