IBP-DISTAL protocol: distal vs radial access for invasive BP in critical care.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Trials Pub Date : 2026-08-20 DOI:10.1186/s13063-026-09962-3
Hongmei Liu, Yuanyuan Zhao, Meiqun Yu, Yuan Zhang, Feifei Zhang, Yang Zhang, Ya Liu, Qian Song, Ran Zhang, Yuan Du, Minghao Liu, Jinwei Zhai, Yang Yang, Xiuchun Yang, Aihua Lian, Pingzhen Li, Yang Tang, Lei Wang, Qiang Zhang, Zhu Zhu, Xiaoyan Feng, Kai Zou, Shuilian Wang, Juan Xu, Jing Zhao, Jidong Guo, Yihui Han, Jingtao Li, Caixia Zhang, Yueyue Yuan, Wenjuan Wu, Jiangwen Liu, Xiongwei He, Lijian Gao
{"title":"IBP-DISTAL protocol: distal vs radial access for invasive BP in critical care.","authors":"Hongmei Liu, Yuanyuan Zhao, Meiqun Yu, Yuan Zhang, Feifei Zhang, Yang Zhang, Ya Liu, Qian Song, Ran Zhang, Yuan Du, Minghao Liu, Jinwei Zhai, Yang Yang, Xiuchun Yang, Aihua Lian, Pingzhen Li, Yang Tang, Lei Wang, Qiang Zhang, Zhu Zhu, Xiaoyan Feng, Kai Zou, Shuilian Wang, Juan Xu, Jing Zhao, Jidong Guo, Yihui Han, Jingtao Li, Caixia Zhang, Yueyue Yuan, Wenjuan Wu, Jiangwen Liu, Xiongwei He, Lijian Gao","doi":"10.1186/s13063-026-09962-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>To determine whether distal radial artery (dTRA) cannulation is non-inferior to conventional radial artery (TRA) cannulation for first-pass success and subsequent safety and accuracy of invasive blood pressure monitoring in awake, critically ill adults.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Prospective, multicenter, randomized, open-label, parallel-group, non-inferiority trial.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study will be conducted in three tertiary hospitals in northwestern China. Eligible patients (≥ 18 years old) requiring invasive arterial pressure monitoring, with palpable distal and proximal radial pulses and a negative modified Allen test, will be centrally randomized (1:1; stratified by previous ipsilateral intervention) to dTRA or TRA. Both groups will undergo blind puncture with a uniform 20 G catheter-over-needle system; ultrasound is reserved for rescue. Pre-procedure ultrasound maps vessel diameter, intima-media thickness and flow velocity.</p><p><strong>Primary endpoint: </strong>one-time success rate of catheterization. Secondary endpoints: total cannulation time, crossover rate, 24 h and 30-day radial artery occlusion (RAO) by Doppler, local complications (EASY hematoma grade), BARC major bleeding (types 2, 3, 5), accidental dislodgment, pain (VAS 0-10), functional score (Barthel Index), and major adverse cardiovascular/cerebrovascular events during ICU stay. Target enrollment 204 (102 per arm) gives 85% power to demonstrate non-inferiority at one-sided α = 0.025, allowing 20% failure rate. All ultrasound assessments are performed by technicians blinded to allocation.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This nurse-led protocol reflects real-world Chinese practice (blind puncture, no ultrasound routine) while standardizing compression (≥ 5 min) and post-procedural care across centers. Results will clarify whether dTRA offers shorter hemostasis time, lower RAO and better comfort without compromising hemodynamic monitoring fidelity.</p><p><strong>Impact: </strong>If non-inferiority is confirmed, dTRA could become the preferred default access for invasive blood pressure monitoring in critical care, preserving future radial conduit and improving patient experience.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>This study has been registered on Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR.org.cn) under the identifier ChiCTR2500101331 (Apr 23, 2025).</p>","PeriodicalId":23333,"journal":{"name":"Trials","volume":"27 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13625380/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-026-09962-3","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: To determine whether distal radial artery (dTRA) cannulation is non-inferior to conventional radial artery (TRA) cannulation for first-pass success and subsequent safety and accuracy of invasive blood pressure monitoring in awake, critically ill adults.

Design: Prospective, multicenter, randomized, open-label, parallel-group, non-inferiority trial.

Methods: The study will be conducted in three tertiary hospitals in northwestern China. Eligible patients (≥ 18 years old) requiring invasive arterial pressure monitoring, with palpable distal and proximal radial pulses and a negative modified Allen test, will be centrally randomized (1:1; stratified by previous ipsilateral intervention) to dTRA or TRA. Both groups will undergo blind puncture with a uniform 20 G catheter-over-needle system; ultrasound is reserved for rescue. Pre-procedure ultrasound maps vessel diameter, intima-media thickness and flow velocity.

Primary endpoint: one-time success rate of catheterization. Secondary endpoints: total cannulation time, crossover rate, 24 h and 30-day radial artery occlusion (RAO) by Doppler, local complications (EASY hematoma grade), BARC major bleeding (types 2, 3, 5), accidental dislodgment, pain (VAS 0-10), functional score (Barthel Index), and major adverse cardiovascular/cerebrovascular events during ICU stay. Target enrollment 204 (102 per arm) gives 85% power to demonstrate non-inferiority at one-sided α = 0.025, allowing 20% failure rate. All ultrasound assessments are performed by technicians blinded to allocation.

Discussion: This nurse-led protocol reflects real-world Chinese practice (blind puncture, no ultrasound routine) while standardizing compression (≥ 5 min) and post-procedural care across centers. Results will clarify whether dTRA offers shorter hemostasis time, lower RAO and better comfort without compromising hemodynamic monitoring fidelity.

Impact: If non-inferiority is confirmed, dTRA could become the preferred default access for invasive blood pressure monitoring in critical care, preserving future radial conduit and improving patient experience.

Trial registration: This study has been registered on Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR.org.cn) under the identifier ChiCTR2500101331 (Apr 23, 2025).

ibp -远端方案:远端与桡骨通路在重症监护中治疗侵袭性血压。
目的:确定桡动脉远端插管(dTRA)是否优于常规桡动脉插管(TRA),在清醒的危重成人有创血压监测的首次成功和随后的安全性和准确性方面。设计:前瞻性、多中心、随机、开放标签、平行组、非劣效性试验。方法:在西北地区三所三级医院进行研究。符合条件的患者(≥18岁)需要有创动脉压监测,桡动脉远端和近端脉搏可触及,改良Allen试验阴性,将被集中随机(1:1;按既往同侧干预分层)至dTRA或TRA。两组均采用统一的20g导管-针套系统进行盲穿刺;超声波是用来抢救的。术前超声测量血管直径、内膜-中膜厚度和血流速度。主要终点:一次性置管成功率。次要终点:总插管时间、交叉率、24小时和30天多普勒桡动脉闭塞(RAO)、局部并发症(EASY血肿分级)、BARC大出血(2、3、5型)、意外脱位、疼痛(VAS 0-10)、功能评分(Barthel指数)、ICU住院期间主要心脑血管不良事件。目标入组人数为204人(每组102人),在单侧α = 0.025时,有85%的能力证明非劣效性,允许20%的失败率。所有的超声评估都是由对分配不知情的技术人员进行的。讨论:这个由护士主导的方案反映了现实世界的中国实践(盲穿刺,无超声常规),同时标准化了各中心的压迫(≥5分钟)和术后护理。结果将阐明dTRA是否在不影响血流动力学监测保真度的情况下提供更短的止血时间、更低的RAO和更好的舒适性。影响:如果非劣效性得到证实,dTRA可能成为危重监护中有创血压监测的首选默认途径,保留未来的桡动脉导管并改善患者体验。试验注册:本研究已在中国临床试验注册中心(ChiCTR.org.cn)注册,注册号为ChiCTR2500101331(2025年4月23日)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Trials
Trials 医学-医学:研究与实验
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
4.00%
发文量
966
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Trials is an open access, peer-reviewed, online journal that will encompass all aspects of the performance and findings of randomized controlled trials. Trials will experiment with, and then refine, innovative approaches to improving communication about trials. We are keen to move beyond publishing traditional trial results articles (although these will be included). We believe this represents an exciting opportunity to advance the science and reporting of trials. Prior to 2006, Trials was published as Current Controlled Trials in Cardiovascular Medicine (CCTCVM). All published CCTCVM articles are available via the Trials website and citations to CCTCVM article URLs will continue to be supported.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书