S S Husain, M Pavlova, W Groot, M T Zaigham, Z Ahmad
{"title":"A systematic review on barriers to the use of contraceptive services and other family planning services among married couples in South Asia.","authors":"S S Husain, M Pavlova, W Groot, M T Zaigham, Z Ahmad","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>There is a dearth of research in terms of systematic review to explore the barriers to contraceptives faced by married couples in South Asia. This systematic review explores the evidence on issues faced by married couples in South Asia regarding the use of contraceptives and other family planning services.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A systematic literature review was conducted using PubMed, EBSCO, and Web of Science databases. Articles published in English between 2011 and 2025 were included. Inclusion criteria were: South Asian married couples, forms of contraception, barriers to using contraception and other family planning services. A directed qualitative content analysis approach was employed, using Andersen's Behavioral Model to classify findings into predisposing, enabling, and need-based factors. Risk Of Bias assessment was done using CASP tool.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 301 records identified, 65 studies were finally included following screening and full-text assessment. Among these, 62% identified cultural and gender-related barriers, 54% highlighted religious influences (especially in Pakistan and Afghanistan), and 48% noted misinformation and knowledge gaps. Additional themes included service inaccessibility, provider bias, and poor outreach, particularly in Nepal and rural India.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In South Asian countries, there are major barriers to the use of contraception and other family planning services, mostly due to the overall lack of knowledge, religious factors and allowing myths and misinformation to discourage the use of contraceptives.</p>","PeriodicalId":39388,"journal":{"name":"Medical Journal of Malaysia","volume":"81 5","pages":"750-758"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Journal of Malaysia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: There is a dearth of research in terms of systematic review to explore the barriers to contraceptives faced by married couples in South Asia. This systematic review explores the evidence on issues faced by married couples in South Asia regarding the use of contraceptives and other family planning services.
Materials and methods: A systematic literature review was conducted using PubMed, EBSCO, and Web of Science databases. Articles published in English between 2011 and 2025 were included. Inclusion criteria were: South Asian married couples, forms of contraception, barriers to using contraception and other family planning services. A directed qualitative content analysis approach was employed, using Andersen's Behavioral Model to classify findings into predisposing, enabling, and need-based factors. Risk Of Bias assessment was done using CASP tool.
Results: Out of 301 records identified, 65 studies were finally included following screening and full-text assessment. Among these, 62% identified cultural and gender-related barriers, 54% highlighted religious influences (especially in Pakistan and Afghanistan), and 48% noted misinformation and knowledge gaps. Additional themes included service inaccessibility, provider bias, and poor outreach, particularly in Nepal and rural India.
Conclusion: In South Asian countries, there are major barriers to the use of contraception and other family planning services, mostly due to the overall lack of knowledge, religious factors and allowing myths and misinformation to discourage the use of contraceptives.
引言:在系统审查方面缺乏研究,以探讨南亚已婚夫妇在避孕方面面临的障碍。本系统综述探讨了南亚已婚夫妇在使用避孕药具和其他计划生育服务方面所面临问题的证据。材料和方法:使用PubMed、EBSCO和Web of Science数据库进行系统的文献综述。收录了2011年至2025年间发表的英文文章。纳入标准为:南亚已婚夫妇、避孕方式、使用避孕措施的障碍和其他计划生育服务。采用直接定性内容分析方法,使用Andersen的行为模型将研究结果分为易感因素、使能因素和基于需求的因素。使用CASP工具进行偏倚风险评估。结果:在确定的301项记录中,65项研究最终通过筛选和全文评估纳入。其中,62%确定了文化和性别障碍,54%强调了宗教影响(特别是在巴基斯坦和阿富汗),48%指出了错误信息和知识差距。其他主题包括服务难以获得、提供者偏见和外联不力,特别是在尼泊尔和印度农村。结论:在南亚国家,使用避孕和其他计划生育服务存在主要障碍,主要是由于整体缺乏知识,宗教因素以及允许神话和错误信息阻止使用避孕药具。
期刊介绍:
Published since 1890 this journal originated as the Journal of the Straits Medical Association. With the formation of the Malaysian Medical Association (MMA), the Journal became the official organ, supervised by an editorial board. Some of the early Hon. Editors were Mr. H.M. McGladdery (1960 - 1964), Dr. A.A. Sandosham (1965 - 1977), Prof. Paul C.Y. Chen (1977 - 1987). It is a scientific journal, published quarterly and can be found in medical libraries in many parts of the world. The Journal also enjoys the status of being listed in the Index Medicus, the internationally accepted reference index of medical journals. The editorial columns often reflect the Association''s views and attitudes towards medical problems in the country. The MJM aims to be a peer reviewed scientific journal of the highest quality. We want to ensure that whatever data is published is true and any opinion expressed important to medical science. We believe being Malaysian is our unique niche; our priority will be for scientific knowledge about diseases found in Malaysia and for the practice of medicine in Malaysia. The MJM will archive knowledge about the changing pattern of human diseases and our endeavours to overcome them. It will also document how medicine develops as a profession in the nation. We will communicate and co-operate with other scientific journals in Malaysia. We seek articles that are of educational value to doctors. We will consider all unsolicited articles submitted to the journal and will commission distinguished Malaysians to write relevant review articles. We want to help doctors make better decisions and be good at judging the value of scientific data. We want to help doctors write better, to be articulate and precise.