Assessment of Residual Sedation in Patients with Traumatic Brain Injury after Cessation of Midazolam Infusion: Is There a Threshold Plasma Concentration?

IF 3.8 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Tim J L Smeets, Merle F de Lange, Birgit C P Koch, Diederik Gommers, Henrik Endeman, Nicole G M Hunfeld, Mathieu van der Jagt
{"title":"Assessment of Residual Sedation in Patients with Traumatic Brain Injury after Cessation of Midazolam Infusion: Is There a Threshold Plasma Concentration?","authors":"Tim J L Smeets, Merle F de Lange, Birgit C P Koch, Diederik Gommers, Henrik Endeman, Nicole G M Hunfeld, Mathieu van der Jagt","doi":"10.1177/08977151261493435","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In traumatic brain injury (TBI) patients, therapeutic drug monitoring of midazolam and its metabolites can help to assess residual sedation. Based on previous literature in non-TBI patients, it is assumed that concentrations of <100 ug/L of midazolam are non-sedative. The objective of this study was to assess the threshold sum concentration of midazolam and metabolites for residual sedation after cessation of midazolam infusion in critically ill TBI patients. We performed a retrospective study at the adult ICU of Erasmus University Medical Center between 07-2017 and 03-2024. TBI patients were included for analysis if sequential Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) scores and at least one midazolam plasma concentration <100 ug/L was available. Residual sedation was evaluated based on improvement in the sum of the Eye and Motor scores from the GCS according to a decision rule. Among 51 patients, 75% (<i>n</i> = 38) had residual sedation. Median sum midazolam concentrations in the residual sedation versus no residual sedation group were 14 ug/L (3-32) and 7 ug/L (3-31), respectively. In the patients with residual sedation an improved EM score of 3 (2-5) was observed within 3 days (2-4) and 22 patients (58%) scored M6 within 4 (2-5) days. Finally, in the residual sedation and no residual sedation group we observed in hospital mortality rates of 5% and 46%, respectively. In TBI patients the threshold concentration for a residual sedative effect of midazolam appears to be much lower than previously described in non-TBI populations. Therefore, clinicians should be reluctant to make withdrawal or limitation of care decisions too early based on low GCS in TBI patients, even in the presence of very low plasma concentrations of midazolam and metabolites.</p>","PeriodicalId":16512,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurotrauma","volume":" ","pages":"8977151261493435"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neurotrauma","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08977151261493435","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In traumatic brain injury (TBI) patients, therapeutic drug monitoring of midazolam and its metabolites can help to assess residual sedation. Based on previous literature in non-TBI patients, it is assumed that concentrations of <100 ug/L of midazolam are non-sedative. The objective of this study was to assess the threshold sum concentration of midazolam and metabolites for residual sedation after cessation of midazolam infusion in critically ill TBI patients. We performed a retrospective study at the adult ICU of Erasmus University Medical Center between 07-2017 and 03-2024. TBI patients were included for analysis if sequential Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) scores and at least one midazolam plasma concentration <100 ug/L was available. Residual sedation was evaluated based on improvement in the sum of the Eye and Motor scores from the GCS according to a decision rule. Among 51 patients, 75% (n = 38) had residual sedation. Median sum midazolam concentrations in the residual sedation versus no residual sedation group were 14 ug/L (3-32) and 7 ug/L (3-31), respectively. In the patients with residual sedation an improved EM score of 3 (2-5) was observed within 3 days (2-4) and 22 patients (58%) scored M6 within 4 (2-5) days. Finally, in the residual sedation and no residual sedation group we observed in hospital mortality rates of 5% and 46%, respectively. In TBI patients the threshold concentration for a residual sedative effect of midazolam appears to be much lower than previously described in non-TBI populations. Therefore, clinicians should be reluctant to make withdrawal or limitation of care decisions too early based on low GCS in TBI patients, even in the presence of very low plasma concentrations of midazolam and metabolites.

创伤性脑损伤患者停止咪达唑仑输注后残留镇静的评估:是否存在血药浓度阈值?
在创伤性脑损伤(TBI)患者中,咪达唑仑及其代谢物的治疗药物监测可以帮助评估残余镇静作用。根据以往非脑外伤患者的文献,我们假设n = 38的浓度有残留镇静作用。残留镇静组和未残留镇静组中位咪达唑仑浓度分别为14 ug/L(3-32)和7 ug/L(3-31)。残余镇静组患者在3天(2-4)内EM评分为3(2-5)分,22例(58%)在4天(2-5)内EM评分为M6分。最后,在残留镇静组和未残留镇静组,我们观察到住院死亡率分别为5%和46%。在TBI患者中,咪达唑仑残余镇静作用的阈值浓度似乎比先前在非TBI人群中描述的要低得多。因此,即使在咪达唑仑及其代谢物的血浆浓度非常低的情况下,临床医生也不应过早地根据TBI患者的低GCS做出停药或限制治疗的决定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of neurotrauma
Journal of neurotrauma 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
7.10%
发文量
233
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Neurotrauma is the flagship, peer-reviewed publication for reporting on the latest advances in both the clinical and laboratory investigation of traumatic brain and spinal cord injury. The Journal focuses on the basic pathobiology of injury to the central nervous system, while considering preclinical and clinical trials targeted at improving both the early management and long-term care and recovery of traumatically injured patients. This is the essential journal publishing cutting-edge basic and translational research in traumatically injured human and animal studies, with emphasis on neurodegenerative disease research linked to CNS trauma.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书