Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Patients Presenting With Locally Advanced Breast Cancer.

IF 44.7 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
Andrea V Barrio, Starr Mautner, Deborah Capko, Daniel X Choi, Stephanie Downs-Canner, Marcia Edelweiss, Mahmoud El-Tamer, Gladys L Giron, Alexandra S Heerdt, Laurie J Kirstein, Minna K Lee, Cristina Lopez-Penalver, Anita Mamtani, Giacomo Montagna, Tracy-Ann Moo, George Plitas, Virgilio Sacchini, Audree B Tadros, Elizabeth Cooney, Alison C Pellecchia, Varadan Sevilimedu, Monica Morrow
{"title":"Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Patients Presenting With Locally Advanced Breast Cancer.","authors":"Andrea V Barrio, Starr Mautner, Deborah Capko, Daniel X Choi, Stephanie Downs-Canner, Marcia Edelweiss, Mahmoud El-Tamer, Gladys L Giron, Alexandra S Heerdt, Laurie J Kirstein, Minna K Lee, Cristina Lopez-Penalver, Anita Mamtani, Giacomo Montagna, Tracy-Ann Moo, George Plitas, Virgilio Sacchini, Audree B Tadros, Elizabeth Cooney, Alison C Pellecchia, Varadan Sevilimedu, Monica Morrow","doi":"10.1200/JCO-26-01114","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To prospectively determine the false-negative rate (FNR) of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in patients with locally advanced breast cancer (LABC).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with cT4 and/or cN2/N3 breast cancer with a nodal complete response (cN0) after NAC were eligible. SLNB was performed with dual-tracer mapping; nodal clipping was not required. All patients had a completion axillary lymph node dissection. FNR calculations were based on the patients with adequate mapping (ie, ≥3 SLNs or <3 SLNs plus clipped node). Of the planned 150 patients, we anticipated that 84 patients would have adequate mapping and that 47 would have residual disease after NAC (nodal pathologic complete response [pCR] rate: 45%). Assuming a true FNR of 10%, we estimated that this sample size would allow estimation of FNR within a margin of error (95% CI half-width) of ±8.6%.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From August 2017 to December 2025, 456 patients were screened for eligibility; 369 (81%) became cN0 after NAC and 145 were enrolled in the study. Of these, 44% of patients had inflammatory breast cancer (cT4d), 23% had other cT4 disease, 12% had cN2 disease, and 21% had cN3 disease. At least 1 SLN was identified in 108 patients (74%), of whom 87 had either ≥3 SLNs (n = 82) or 1-2 SLNs with a clipped node retrieved (n = 5). Of 87 patients with adequate mapping, the nodal pCR rate was 46%; of 47 (54%) with residual nodal disease, one false-negative SLN was observed, yielding an SLN FNR of 2.1% (95% CI, 0.1 to 12.7).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In a prospective cohort of patients with LABC, the SLN identification rate was 74% and the FNR was 2.1%, suggesting that SLNB may be an appropriate method to stage the axilla in LABC after downstaging with NAC.</p>","PeriodicalId":15384,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Oncology","volume":" ","pages":"JCO2601114"},"PeriodicalIF":44.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO-26-01114","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To prospectively determine the false-negative rate (FNR) of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in patients with locally advanced breast cancer (LABC).

Methods: Patients with cT4 and/or cN2/N3 breast cancer with a nodal complete response (cN0) after NAC were eligible. SLNB was performed with dual-tracer mapping; nodal clipping was not required. All patients had a completion axillary lymph node dissection. FNR calculations were based on the patients with adequate mapping (ie, ≥3 SLNs or <3 SLNs plus clipped node). Of the planned 150 patients, we anticipated that 84 patients would have adequate mapping and that 47 would have residual disease after NAC (nodal pathologic complete response [pCR] rate: 45%). Assuming a true FNR of 10%, we estimated that this sample size would allow estimation of FNR within a margin of error (95% CI half-width) of ±8.6%.

Results: From August 2017 to December 2025, 456 patients were screened for eligibility; 369 (81%) became cN0 after NAC and 145 were enrolled in the study. Of these, 44% of patients had inflammatory breast cancer (cT4d), 23% had other cT4 disease, 12% had cN2 disease, and 21% had cN3 disease. At least 1 SLN was identified in 108 patients (74%), of whom 87 had either ≥3 SLNs (n = 82) or 1-2 SLNs with a clipped node retrieved (n = 5). Of 87 patients with adequate mapping, the nodal pCR rate was 46%; of 47 (54%) with residual nodal disease, one false-negative SLN was observed, yielding an SLN FNR of 2.1% (95% CI, 0.1 to 12.7).

Conclusion: In a prospective cohort of patients with LABC, the SLN identification rate was 74% and the FNR was 2.1%, suggesting that SLNB may be an appropriate method to stage the axilla in LABC after downstaging with NAC.

局部晚期乳腺癌患者新辅助化疗后前哨淋巴结活检。
目的:前瞻性测定局部晚期乳腺癌(LABC)患者新辅助化疗(NAC)后前哨淋巴结活检(SLNB)假阴性率(FNR)。方法:cT4和/或cN2/N3乳腺癌患者在NAC后淋巴结完全缓解(cN0)。采用双示踪剂作图进行SLNB;不需要进行节点裁剪。所有患者均完成腋窝淋巴结清扫。结果:2017年8月至2025年12月,筛选了456例患者,其中369例(81%)在NAC后变为cN0, 145例纳入研究。其中,44%的患者患有炎性乳腺癌(cT4d), 23%患有其他cT4疾病,12%患有cN2疾病,21%患有cN3疾病。108例患者(74%)中至少发现1个SLN,其中87例患者有≥3个SLN (n = 82)或1-2个SLN并有一个切除的淋巴结(n = 5)。在87例有充分定位的患者中,节点pCR率为46%;在47例(54%)伴有残余淋巴结病的患者中,观察到1例假阴性SLN, SLN FNR为2.1% (95% CI, 0.1至12.7)。结论:在LABC患者的前瞻性队列中,SLN识别率为74%,FNR为2.1%,提示SLNB可能是NAC降分期后LABC中腋窝分期的合适方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Journal of Clinical Oncology 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
41.20
自引率
2.20%
发文量
8215
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Oncology serves its readers as the single most credible, authoritative resource for disseminating significant clinical oncology research. In print and in electronic format, JCO strives to publish the highest quality articles dedicated to clinical research. Original Reports remain the focus of JCO, but this scientific communication is enhanced by appropriately selected Editorials, Commentaries, Reviews, and other work that relate to the care of patients with cancer.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书