Effect of SFMA-guided Qihuang Needling vs conventional acupuncture on paraspinal neuromuscular activity in lumbar disc herniation: A randomised controlled trial.
{"title":"Effect of SFMA-guided Qihuang Needling vs conventional acupuncture on paraspinal neuromuscular activity in lumbar disc herniation: A randomised controlled trial.","authors":"Shuangshuang Yuan, Hongcen Liu, Yuting Huang, Jianxia Zeng, Wenxu Deng, Zhihua Peng, Lixia Yang, Mingzhu Xu, Nanbu Wang, Shaoyang Cui","doi":"10.1177/10538127261494050","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundLumbar disc herniation (LDH) commonly causes chronic low back and leg pain. Qihuang Needling (QN) is a micro-invasive technique targeting myofascial dysfunction, but its effects on paraspinal neuromuscular activity have not been objectively quantified.ObjectiveTo determine whether SFMA-guided QN produces greater immediate improvement than conventional acupuncture (CA) in paraspinal neuromuscular activity.MethodsIn this single-centre, assessor- and statistician-blinded trial, 68 outpatients with LDH were allocated 1:1 to five daily sessions of SFMA-guided QN or CA. The primary endpoint was static multifidus AEMG, analysed by ANCOVA with baseline adjustment; pain and disability were exploratory endpoints.ResultsAll 68 participants completed the trial. Static multifidus AEMG increased more with QN than CA (adjusted difference 7.43 μV, 95% CI 2.74 to 12.12; P = 0.002). All seven secondary sEMG endpoints also improved more with QN after false-discovery-rate control. The Oswestry Disability Index difference was -17.17 points (95% CI -20.53 to -13.81); responder rates were 76.5% versus 35.3% (P = 0.001). No serious adverse events occurred.ConclusionsFive daily sessions of SFMA-guided QN produced greater immediate improvement in paraspinal neuromuscular activity than CA. Whether these differences persist, and which components account for them, cannot be determined from this trial.</p>","PeriodicalId":15129,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"10538127261494050"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10538127261494050","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
BackgroundLumbar disc herniation (LDH) commonly causes chronic low back and leg pain. Qihuang Needling (QN) is a micro-invasive technique targeting myofascial dysfunction, but its effects on paraspinal neuromuscular activity have not been objectively quantified.ObjectiveTo determine whether SFMA-guided QN produces greater immediate improvement than conventional acupuncture (CA) in paraspinal neuromuscular activity.MethodsIn this single-centre, assessor- and statistician-blinded trial, 68 outpatients with LDH were allocated 1:1 to five daily sessions of SFMA-guided QN or CA. The primary endpoint was static multifidus AEMG, analysed by ANCOVA with baseline adjustment; pain and disability were exploratory endpoints.ResultsAll 68 participants completed the trial. Static multifidus AEMG increased more with QN than CA (adjusted difference 7.43 μV, 95% CI 2.74 to 12.12; P = 0.002). All seven secondary sEMG endpoints also improved more with QN after false-discovery-rate control. The Oswestry Disability Index difference was -17.17 points (95% CI -20.53 to -13.81); responder rates were 76.5% versus 35.3% (P = 0.001). No serious adverse events occurred.ConclusionsFive daily sessions of SFMA-guided QN produced greater immediate improvement in paraspinal neuromuscular activity than CA. Whether these differences persist, and which components account for them, cannot be determined from this trial.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation is a journal whose main focus is to present relevant information about the interdisciplinary approach to musculoskeletal rehabilitation for clinicians who treat patients with back and musculoskeletal pain complaints. It will provide readers with both 1) a general fund of knowledge on the assessment and management of specific problems and 2) new information considered to be state-of-the-art in the field. The intended audience is multidisciplinary as well as multi-specialty.
In each issue clinicians can find information which they can use in their patient setting the very next day.