Effect of SFMA-guided Qihuang Needling vs conventional acupuncture on paraspinal neuromuscular activity in lumbar disc herniation: A randomised controlled trial.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Shuangshuang Yuan, Hongcen Liu, Yuting Huang, Jianxia Zeng, Wenxu Deng, Zhihua Peng, Lixia Yang, Mingzhu Xu, Nanbu Wang, Shaoyang Cui
{"title":"Effect of SFMA-guided Qihuang Needling vs conventional acupuncture on paraspinal neuromuscular activity in lumbar disc herniation: A randomised controlled trial.","authors":"Shuangshuang Yuan, Hongcen Liu, Yuting Huang, Jianxia Zeng, Wenxu Deng, Zhihua Peng, Lixia Yang, Mingzhu Xu, Nanbu Wang, Shaoyang Cui","doi":"10.1177/10538127261494050","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundLumbar disc herniation (LDH) commonly causes chronic low back and leg pain. Qihuang Needling (QN) is a micro-invasive technique targeting myofascial dysfunction, but its effects on paraspinal neuromuscular activity have not been objectively quantified.ObjectiveTo determine whether SFMA-guided QN produces greater immediate improvement than conventional acupuncture (CA) in paraspinal neuromuscular activity.MethodsIn this single-centre, assessor- and statistician-blinded trial, 68 outpatients with LDH were allocated 1:1 to five daily sessions of SFMA-guided QN or CA. The primary endpoint was static multifidus AEMG, analysed by ANCOVA with baseline adjustment; pain and disability were exploratory endpoints.ResultsAll 68 participants completed the trial. Static multifidus AEMG increased more with QN than CA (adjusted difference 7.43 μV, 95% CI 2.74 to 12.12; P = 0.002). All seven secondary sEMG endpoints also improved more with QN after false-discovery-rate control. The Oswestry Disability Index difference was -17.17 points (95% CI -20.53 to -13.81); responder rates were 76.5% versus 35.3% (P = 0.001). No serious adverse events occurred.ConclusionsFive daily sessions of SFMA-guided QN produced greater immediate improvement in paraspinal neuromuscular activity than CA. Whether these differences persist, and which components account for them, cannot be determined from this trial.</p>","PeriodicalId":15129,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"10538127261494050"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10538127261494050","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BackgroundLumbar disc herniation (LDH) commonly causes chronic low back and leg pain. Qihuang Needling (QN) is a micro-invasive technique targeting myofascial dysfunction, but its effects on paraspinal neuromuscular activity have not been objectively quantified.ObjectiveTo determine whether SFMA-guided QN produces greater immediate improvement than conventional acupuncture (CA) in paraspinal neuromuscular activity.MethodsIn this single-centre, assessor- and statistician-blinded trial, 68 outpatients with LDH were allocated 1:1 to five daily sessions of SFMA-guided QN or CA. The primary endpoint was static multifidus AEMG, analysed by ANCOVA with baseline adjustment; pain and disability were exploratory endpoints.ResultsAll 68 participants completed the trial. Static multifidus AEMG increased more with QN than CA (adjusted difference 7.43 μV, 95% CI 2.74 to 12.12; P = 0.002). All seven secondary sEMG endpoints also improved more with QN after false-discovery-rate control. The Oswestry Disability Index difference was -17.17 points (95% CI -20.53 to -13.81); responder rates were 76.5% versus 35.3% (P = 0.001). No serious adverse events occurred.ConclusionsFive daily sessions of SFMA-guided QN produced greater immediate improvement in paraspinal neuromuscular activity than CA. Whether these differences persist, and which components account for them, cannot be determined from this trial.

sfma引导下芪黄针与常规针刺对腰椎间盘突出症椎旁神经肌肉活动的影响:一项随机对照试验。
背景:腰椎间盘突出症(LDH)通常会引起慢性腰痛和腿部疼痛。七黄针(QN)是一种针对肌筋膜功能障碍的微创技术,但其对棘旁神经肌肉活动的影响尚未客观量化。目的探讨sfma引导下的QN是否比常规针刺(CA)更能立即改善棘旁神经肌肉活动。方法在这项单中心、评估者和统计学家双盲试验中,68例LDH门诊患者按1:1的比例被分配到sfma指导下的每日5次QN或CA。主要终点是静态多裂肌AEMG,通过ANCOVA进行基线调整分析;疼痛和残疾是探索性终点。结果68名受试者全部完成试验。QN对静态多眼AEMG的影响大于CA(校正差为7.43 μV, 95% CI 2.74 ~ 12.12; P = 0.002)。在错误发现率控制后,QN对所有7个次要sEMG终点的改善也更大。Oswestry残疾指数差异为-17.17点(95% CI -20.53 ~ -13.81);应答率分别为76.5%和35.3% (P = 0.001)。未发生严重不良事件。结论:每日5次sfma引导下的QN比CA更能立即改善棘旁神经肌肉活动。这些差异是否持续存在,以及哪些成分导致了这些差异,不能从本试验中确定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
194
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation is a journal whose main focus is to present relevant information about the interdisciplinary approach to musculoskeletal rehabilitation for clinicians who treat patients with back and musculoskeletal pain complaints. It will provide readers with both 1) a general fund of knowledge on the assessment and management of specific problems and 2) new information considered to be state-of-the-art in the field. The intended audience is multidisciplinary as well as multi-specialty. In each issue clinicians can find information which they can use in their patient setting the very next day.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书