Comparative Weight-Loss Outcomes Following Initiation of GLP-1 Receptor Agonists Versus SGLT2 Inhibitors: A Real-World Active Comparator Study.

IF 4.4 3区 医学 Q2 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Valentin Milanov
{"title":"Comparative Weight-Loss Outcomes Following Initiation of GLP-1 Receptor Agonists Versus SGLT2 Inhibitors: A Real-World Active Comparator Study.","authors":"Valentin Milanov","doi":"10.1016/j.eprac.2026.09.013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare 12-month weight loss between glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonist (GLP-1RA) and SGLT2 inhibitor (SGLT2i) initiators and assess effect modification by diabetes status, sex, and race/ethnicity in a diverse US cohort.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective active comparator new-user cohort study using the NIH All of Us Research Program (2018-2023). We identified 2932 SGLT2i-naïve GLP-1RA initiators and 941 GLP-1RA-naïve SGLT2i initiators aged 18 to 80 with body mass index ≥27 kg/m<sup>2</sup> and available weight measurements. Inverse probability of treatment weighting with a 17-covariate propensity score model-including heart failure and chronic kidney disease-achieved balance on all 28 diagnostics (maximum standardized mean differences 0.077). The primary outcome was percent body weight change at 12 months; secondary outcomes included ≥10% weight loss, HbA1c, and blood pressure change.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After inverse probability of treatment weighting, GLP-1RA initiators lost more weight than SGLT2i initiators (difference -1.20 pp [95% confidence interval [CI], -1.91 to -0.48]; P =.001; odds ratio 1.75 [95% CI, 1.40-2.19]; risk ratio 1.61 [95% CI, 1.19-2.03]; number needed to treat 14), concentrated in obesity-only patients (-1.96 pp; P < .001) but absent in type 2 diabetes (+0.08 pp; interaction P =.006). Sex modified the effect (P =.017): -1.71 pp in women vs +0.12 pp in men. HbA1c decreased more with GLP-1RA (-0.261%; P =.032); blood pressure did not differ significantly.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>GLP-1RA initiators achieved greater weight loss than SGLT2i initiators, concentrated in women and patients without type 2 diabetes, supporting individualized treatment selection. Interaction findings are hypothesis-generating and require prospective confirmation.</p>","PeriodicalId":11682,"journal":{"name":"Endocrine Practice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13692698/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Endocrine Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eprac.2026.09.013","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To compare 12-month weight loss between glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonist (GLP-1RA) and SGLT2 inhibitor (SGLT2i) initiators and assess effect modification by diabetes status, sex, and race/ethnicity in a diverse US cohort.

Methods: Retrospective active comparator new-user cohort study using the NIH All of Us Research Program (2018-2023). We identified 2932 SGLT2i-naïve GLP-1RA initiators and 941 GLP-1RA-naïve SGLT2i initiators aged 18 to 80 with body mass index ≥27 kg/m2 and available weight measurements. Inverse probability of treatment weighting with a 17-covariate propensity score model-including heart failure and chronic kidney disease-achieved balance on all 28 diagnostics (maximum standardized mean differences 0.077). The primary outcome was percent body weight change at 12 months; secondary outcomes included ≥10% weight loss, HbA1c, and blood pressure change.

Results: After inverse probability of treatment weighting, GLP-1RA initiators lost more weight than SGLT2i initiators (difference -1.20 pp [95% confidence interval [CI], -1.91 to -0.48]; P =.001; odds ratio 1.75 [95% CI, 1.40-2.19]; risk ratio 1.61 [95% CI, 1.19-2.03]; number needed to treat 14), concentrated in obesity-only patients (-1.96 pp; P < .001) but absent in type 2 diabetes (+0.08 pp; interaction P =.006). Sex modified the effect (P =.017): -1.71 pp in women vs +0.12 pp in men. HbA1c decreased more with GLP-1RA (-0.261%; P =.032); blood pressure did not differ significantly.

Conclusion: GLP-1RA initiators achieved greater weight loss than SGLT2i initiators, concentrated in women and patients without type 2 diabetes, supporting individualized treatment selection. Interaction findings are hypothesis-generating and require prospective confirmation.

GLP-1受体激动剂与SGLT2抑制剂启动后的减肥结果比较:一项真实世界的活性比较研究
目的:比较GLP-1受体激动剂(GLP-1RA)和SGLT2抑制剂(SGLT2i)启动剂12个月的减肥效果,并评估糖尿病状况、性别和种族/民族对效果的影响。方法:采用NIH All of Us研究计划(2018-2023)进行回顾性主动比较新用户队列研究。我们确定了2,932名SGLT2i-naïve GLP-1RA启动者和941名GLP-1RA-naïve SGLT2i启动者,年龄在18-80岁,BMI≥27 kg/m2,并有体重测量数据。使用17协变量倾向评分模型(包括心力衰竭和CKD)的治疗加权逆概率(IPTW)在所有28种诊断上均达到平衡(最大SMD为0.077)。主要结局是12个月时体重变化百分比;次要结局包括体重减轻≥10%、HbA1c和血压变化。结果:IPTW后,GLP-1RA启动者比SGLT2i启动者体重减轻更多(差异为-1.20 pp [95% CI, -1.91至-0.48];P = .001; OR 1.75 [95% CI, 1.40-2.19]; RR 1.61 [95% CI, 1.19-2.03]; NNT 14),主要集中在肥胖患者(-1.96 pp; P)。结论:GLP-1RA启动者比SGLT2i启动者体重减轻更大,主要集中在女性和无2型糖尿病患者中,支持个体化治疗选择。相互作用的发现是假设产生的,需要前瞻性的确认。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Endocrine Practice
Endocrine Practice ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM-
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
2.40%
发文量
546
审稿时长
41 days
期刊介绍: Endocrine Practice (ISSN: 1530-891X), a peer-reviewed journal published twelve times a year, is the official journal of the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists (AACE). The primary mission of Endocrine Practice is to enhance the health care of patients with endocrine diseases through continuing education of practicing endocrinologists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书