Upadacitinib for Acute Severe Ulcerative Colitis: Real-World Tertiary Care Outcomes.

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Digestion Pub Date : 2026-09-29 DOI:10.1159/dig/acmag024
Fares Jamal, Alejandro J Gonzalez, Sandra Elmasry, Amani Elshaer, Talha Malik
{"title":"Upadacitinib for Acute Severe Ulcerative Colitis: Real-World Tertiary Care Outcomes.","authors":"Fares Jamal, Alejandro J Gonzalez, Sandra Elmasry, Amani Elshaer, Talha Malik","doi":"10.1159/dig/acmag024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Background Acute severe ulcerative colitis (ASUC) affects up to 25% of patients with ulcerative colitis. Despite intravenous (IV) corticosteroids as first-line therapy, 30-40% require rescue treatment and up to 40% undergo colectomy within one year. Upadacitinib (UPA) has shown ability to induce rapid response in moderate-severe UC, but real-world data in ASUC remain limited. We aimed to describe outcomes of UPA initiation for ASUC across Mayo Clinic sites. Methods We conducted a descriptive study of 23 adults hospitalized with ASUC between 2022-2025 at Mayo Clinic. Patients with their first ASUC admission who were started on UPA were included. All patients received IV methylprednisolone (40-60 mg/day) within 24-48 hours of admission, followed by UPA initiation (inpatient or shortly after discharge). Clinical, laboratory, and treatment data were extracted from electronic medical records. Outcomes included colectomy during admission and colectomy within one year. Descriptive statistics were done using Microsoft Excel. Results Twenty-three patients received UPA (median age 35 years; 88% pancolitis; 4% PSC). Out of the 23, 18 were started on UPA during the ASUC admission. Before admission, 10 patients (43%) were receiving corticosteroids, three (13%) were on mesalamine, one (4%) on azathioprine, and 12 (52%) were on biologic therapy; four patients (17%) were already on lower dose UPA maintenance. The median number of prior advanced therapies was two (range 1-4). Admission labs showed a mean CRP of 56.3 mg/L (SD 44.9) and fecal calprotectin of 2521.9 µg/g (SD 783.9). Patients received IV corticosteroids for a mean of 3.7 days (SD 1.1), and UPA was initiated at a median of hospital day 3 (IQR 4). 2/18 patients (11.1%), who were started on UPA inpatient, required colectomy during admission. Of the 23 patients who received UPA during hospitalization or shortly after discharge, one year colectomy rate was 4/23 (17%). Conclusions In this cohort, initiation of UPA during hospitalization or shortly after discharge for ASUC was feasible and was associated with lower colectomy rates compared with published outcomes for patients treated with infliximab or cyclosporine, both during hospitalization (11.1% vs. 21% vs. 25%) and at one year (17% vs. 35% vs. 45%). These findings suggest that UPA may serve as an effective rescue option for hospitalized ASUC patients, particularly when rapid control of inflammation is needed. Larger prospective studies are warranted to confirm these observations and to define optimal timing, patient selection, and long-term safety in the ASUC setting.</p>","PeriodicalId":11315,"journal":{"name":"Digestion","volume":" ","pages":"1"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Digestion","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/dig/acmag024","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background Acute severe ulcerative colitis (ASUC) affects up to 25% of patients with ulcerative colitis. Despite intravenous (IV) corticosteroids as first-line therapy, 30-40% require rescue treatment and up to 40% undergo colectomy within one year. Upadacitinib (UPA) has shown ability to induce rapid response in moderate-severe UC, but real-world data in ASUC remain limited. We aimed to describe outcomes of UPA initiation for ASUC across Mayo Clinic sites. Methods We conducted a descriptive study of 23 adults hospitalized with ASUC between 2022-2025 at Mayo Clinic. Patients with their first ASUC admission who were started on UPA were included. All patients received IV methylprednisolone (40-60 mg/day) within 24-48 hours of admission, followed by UPA initiation (inpatient or shortly after discharge). Clinical, laboratory, and treatment data were extracted from electronic medical records. Outcomes included colectomy during admission and colectomy within one year. Descriptive statistics were done using Microsoft Excel. Results Twenty-three patients received UPA (median age 35 years; 88% pancolitis; 4% PSC). Out of the 23, 18 were started on UPA during the ASUC admission. Before admission, 10 patients (43%) were receiving corticosteroids, three (13%) were on mesalamine, one (4%) on azathioprine, and 12 (52%) were on biologic therapy; four patients (17%) were already on lower dose UPA maintenance. The median number of prior advanced therapies was two (range 1-4). Admission labs showed a mean CRP of 56.3 mg/L (SD 44.9) and fecal calprotectin of 2521.9 µg/g (SD 783.9). Patients received IV corticosteroids for a mean of 3.7 days (SD 1.1), and UPA was initiated at a median of hospital day 3 (IQR 4). 2/18 patients (11.1%), who were started on UPA inpatient, required colectomy during admission. Of the 23 patients who received UPA during hospitalization or shortly after discharge, one year colectomy rate was 4/23 (17%). Conclusions In this cohort, initiation of UPA during hospitalization or shortly after discharge for ASUC was feasible and was associated with lower colectomy rates compared with published outcomes for patients treated with infliximab or cyclosporine, both during hospitalization (11.1% vs. 21% vs. 25%) and at one year (17% vs. 35% vs. 45%). These findings suggest that UPA may serve as an effective rescue option for hospitalized ASUC patients, particularly when rapid control of inflammation is needed. Larger prospective studies are warranted to confirm these observations and to define optimal timing, patient selection, and long-term safety in the ASUC setting.

Upadacitinib治疗急性重度溃疡性结肠炎:真实世界三级护理结果。
背景:急性严重溃疡性结肠炎(ASUC)影响高达25%的溃疡性结肠炎患者。尽管静脉注射(IV)皮质类固醇作为一线治疗,但30-40%的患者需要抢救治疗,高达40%的患者在一年内接受结肠切除术。Upadacitinib (UPA)已显示出在中重度UC中诱导快速反应的能力,但在ASUC中的实际数据仍然有限。我们的目的是描述在梅奥诊所各地点的ASUC启动UPA的结果。方法:我们对梅奥诊所2022-2025年间住院的23例成人ASUC进行了描述性研究。首次ASUC入院并开始使用UPA的患者纳入研究。所有患者在入院24-48小时内接受静脉注射甲基强的松龙(40- 60mg /天),随后开始UPA治疗(住院或出院后不久)。从电子病历中提取临床、实验室和治疗数据。结果包括入院时结肠切除术和一年内结肠切除术。描述性统计使用Microsoft Excel进行。结果23例患者接受了UPA治疗(中位年龄35岁,88%为全结肠炎,4%为PSC)。在23例中,18例在ASUC入院期间开始使用UPA。入院前,10例(43%)患者接受皮质类固醇治疗,3例(13%)使用美沙拉胺,1例(4%)使用硫唑嘌呤,12例(52%)使用生物治疗;4名患者(17%)已经接受低剂量UPA维持治疗。既往高级治疗的中位数为2次(范围1-4)。入院实验室显示平均CRP为56.3 mg/L (SD 44.9),粪便钙保护素为2521.9µg/g (SD 783.9)。患者接受静脉注射皮质类固醇的平均时间为3.7天(SD 1.1), UPA在住院第3天开始(IQR 4)。2/18(11.1%)的患者在住院期间开始接受UPA治疗,需要结肠切除术。在住院期间或出院后不久接受UPA的23例患者中,1年结肠切除术率为4/23(17%)。结论:在本队列中,ASUC患者在住院期间或出院后不久开始UPA治疗是可行的,与已发表的英夫利昔单抗或环孢素治疗的患者相比,UPA在住院期间(11.1%对21%对25%)和一年后(17%对35%对45%)的结肠切除术率较低。这些发现表明,UPA可以作为住院ASUC患者的有效抢救选择,特别是当需要快速控制炎症时。有必要进行更大规模的前瞻性研究来证实这些观察结果,并确定ASUC的最佳时机、患者选择和长期安全性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Digestion
Digestion 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
39
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: ''Digestion'' concentrates on clinical research reports: in addition to editorials and reviews, the journal features sections on Stomach/Esophagus, Bowel, Neuro-Gastroenterology, Liver/Bile, Pancreas, Metabolism/Nutrition and Gastrointestinal Oncology. Papers cover physiology in humans, metabolic studies and clinical work on the etiology, diagnosis, and therapy of human diseases. It is thus especially cut out for gastroenterologists employed in hospitals and outpatient units. Moreover, the journal''s coverage of studies on the metabolism and effects of therapeutic drugs carries considerable value for clinicians and investigators beyond the immediate field of gastroenterology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书